skills/fusengine/agents/prompt-optimization

prompt-optimization

SKILL.md

Prompt Optimization

Skill for analyzing and improving existing prompts.

Optimization Workflow

1. ANALYZE current prompt
2. IDENTIFY issues
3. APPLY corrections
4. VALIDATE improvement
5. DOCUMENT changes

Analysis Checklist

Clarity

  • Unambiguous instructions?
  • Clearly defined objective?
  • Precise vocabulary?

Structure

  • Well-delimited sections?
  • Logical order?
  • Clear hierarchy?

Completeness

  • Output format defined?
  • Error cases handled?
  • Examples if needed?

Guardrails

  • Explicit limits?
  • Forbidden behaviors listed?
  • Appropriate security?

Common Problems and Solutions

1. Vague Instructions

Before:

Write a good summary.

After:

Write a 100-150 word summary that:
1. Captures the main idea in the first sentence
2. Includes 2-3 supporting key points
3. Uses accessible language (high school level)
4. Avoids technical jargon

2. Lack of Context

Before:

Analyze this code.

After:

Analyze this Python code focusing on:
- Performance (algorithmic complexity)
- Readability (PEP 8 conventions)
- Security (OWASP vulnerabilities)

Context: Code for production REST API, 10k requests/day.

3. Undefined Format

Before:

Give me recommendations.

After:

Provide 3-5 recommendations in this format:

## Recommendation [N]: [Short title]
**Impact:** [High/Medium/Low]
**Effort:** [High/Medium/Low]
**Action:** [1-2 sentence description]

4. No Error Handling

Before:

Translate this text to French.

After:

Translate this text to French.

IF the text is already in French:
  → Indicate "The text is already in French" and suggest style improvements.

IF the text contains technical jargon:
  → Keep technical terms in English with translation in parentheses.

IF the text is too long (>1000 words):
  → Ask for confirmation before proceeding.

5. Insufficient Emphasis

Before:

Don't make up information.

After:

CRITICAL - ZERO TOLERANCE: NEVER make up information.
IF uncertain → Explicitly say "I'm not sure about..."
IF no data → Say "I don't have this information"

Improvement Techniques

Add Chain-of-Thought

# Addition
Before answering, think step by step:
1. What exactly is being asked?
2. What information do I have?
3. What is the best approach?
4. Are there pitfalls to avoid?

Add Examples

# Addition
## Examples

### Good example
Input: [...]
Output: [Expected output]

### Bad example (to avoid)
Input: [...]
Incorrect output: [What we don't want]
Why incorrect: [Explanation]

Strengthen Guardrails

# Addition
## Forbidden (STRICT)
- [Forbidden behavior 1]
- [Forbidden behavior 2]

## Required (ALWAYS)
- [Required behavior 1]
- [Required behavior 2]

Optimization Report Format

# Optimization of [Prompt Name]

## Before/After Score
| Criterion | Before | After |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| Clarity | X/10 | Y/10 |
| Structure | X/10 | Y/10 |
| Completeness | X/10 | Y/10 |
| Guardrails | X/10 | Y/10 |
| **Total** | **X/40** | **Y/40** |

## Identified Issues
1. [Issue 1]
2. [Issue 2]

## Applied Changes
| Before | After | Reason |
|--------|-------|--------|
| [...] | [...] | [...] |

## Optimized Prompt
---
[THE COMPLETE PROMPT]
---

## Recommended Tests
- [ ] Standard case test
- [ ] Edge case test 1
- [ ] Edge case test 2

Forbidden

  • Never change the original meaning of the prompt
  • Never add unrequested features
  • Never remove existing guardrails
  • Never make the prompt longer without justification
Weekly Installs
24
GitHub Stars
3
First Seen
Feb 10, 2026
Installed on
opencode24
gemini-cli24
github-copilot24
codex24
kimi-cli24
amp24