obsidian-project-kb-core
Obsidian Project KB Core
This is the main workflow authority for project-scoped Obsidian knowledge maintenance.
Default project root:
Research/{project-slug}/
Default structure:
00-Hub.md
01-Plan.md
02-Index.md
Sources/
Knowledge/
Experiments/
Results/
Reports/
Writing/
Daily/
Maps/
Archive/
_system/
Core rules
- Keep all durable project knowledge inside the current
Research/{project-slug}/. - Keep repo-local
.claude/project-memory/*only as the runtime binding layer. _system/registry.mdis the only visible project registry.02-Index.mdis a human navigation note, not a registry mirror.Maps/is a derived-artifact area; do not generate non-essential canvases by default.Results/Reports/is the default subdirectory for round and batch experiment reports.
Responsibilities
- detect and bind the current repo to a project root
- bootstrap the project skeleton
- route notes into
Sources / Knowledge / Experiments / Results / Results/Reports / Writing / Daily / Maps / Archive - update
00-Hub.md,01-Plan.md,02-Index.md - update
_system/registry.md,_system/schema.md,_system/lint-report.md - handle note lifecycle actions: create, update, rename, archive, purge, promote, and link repair
- run deterministic health checks through helper scripts
Deterministic helpers
Use the scripts under scripts/ for:
- scaffold
- registry consistency
- link checks
- index checks
- canvas checks
- lint aggregation
Use agents for:
- note routing
- daily promotion decisions
- source vs knowledge judgment
- stable-result judgment
- semantic Hub and Index updates
Read next
references/DIRECTORY-SCHEMA.mdreferences/HUB-PLAN-INDEX.mdreferences/REGISTRY.mdreferences/DAILY-PROMOTION.mdreferences/LIFECYCLE.mdreferences/LINT.mdreferences/BINDING-LAYER.md
More from galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar
paper-self-review
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review paper quality", "check paper completeness", "validate paper structure", "self-review before submission", or mentions systematic paper quality checking. Provides comprehensive quality assurance checklist for academic papers.
188citation-verification
This skill provides reference guidance for citation verification in academic writing. Use when the user asks about "citation verification best practices", "how to verify references", "preventing fake citations", or needs guidance on citation accuracy. This skill supports ml-paper-writing by providing detailed verification principles and common error patterns.
169ui-ux-pro-max
This skill should be used when the user asks to design or review a UI, create a landing page or dashboard, choose colors or typography, improve accessibility, or implement polished frontend interfaces with a clear design system.
135ml-paper-writing
Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, conducting literature reviews, finding related work, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, citation verification workflows, and paper discovery/evaluation criteria.
127review-response
Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing. Use when the user asks to "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "draft review response", or "analyze review comments". Improves paper acceptance rates.
127results-analysis
This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze experimental results", "run strict statistical analysis", "compare model performance", "generate scientific figures", "check significance", "do ablation analysis", or mentions interpreting experiment data with rigorous statistics and visualization. It focuses on strict analysis bundles, not Results-section prose.
121