gate-info-addresstracker

The on-chain detective Skill. The user inputs an on-chain address; the system first calls the address info Tool to get the profile, then based on user intent depth (simple query vs. fund tracing) decides whether to additionally call transaction history and fund flow tracing Tools.

Trigger Scenarios: User provides an on-chain address (0x... / bc1... / T... format) or explicitly expresses intent to track/query an address.

---

Routing Rules

User Intent	Keywords/Pattern	Action
Query address info	"who owns this address" "check 0x..."	Execute this Skill (Basic Mode)
Track fund flow	"track" "fund flow" "where did this money go"	Execute this Skill (Deep Tracking Mode)
Token on-chain analysis	"ETH chip analysis" "what are smart money buying"	Route to gate-info-tokenonchain
Address risk check	"is this address safe" "is this a blacklisted address"	Route to gate-info-riskcheck
Single transaction query	"what is this transaction" "decode this tx"	Call info_onchain_get_transaction directly
Entity/institution tracking	"Jump Trading holdings" "this institution's address"	Route to gate-info-whaletracker

---

Execution Workflow

Step 1: Intent Recognition & Parameter Extraction

Extract from user input:

• address: On-chain address (auto-detect format)
• chain (optional): Chain type (ETH/BSC/TRX/BTC, etc. — can be auto-inferred from address format)
• intent_depth: User intent depth
  • basic — just asking "who is this" / "how much do they hold"
  • deep — requesting "track funds" / "show transactions" / "where did the money go"

Automatic Address Format Detection:

Address Prefix	Inferred Chain
0x	Ethereum (default; could also be BSC/Polygon/Arbitrum or other EVM chains)
bc1 / 1 / 3	Bitcoin
T	Tron
Other	Prompt user to specify the chain

Step 2: Phase 1 — Address Profile (Required)

Step	MCP Tool	Parameters	Retrieved Data
1	info_onchain_get_address_info	address={address}, chain={chain}, scope="with_defi"	Address profile: balance, labels, risk score, DeFi positions, PnL

Step 3: Decision Branch

get_address_info response
    │
    ├── User only wants a simple query (intent_depth = basic)
    │   └── → Output address profile report directly (skip to Step 5)
    │
    └── User requests deep tracking (intent_depth = deep)
        └── → Proceed to Step 4 parallel calls

Conditions for automatic upgrade to deep mode:

• Address has known labels (e.g., exchange, hacker, whale) → likely worth investigating
• Address balance > $1M
• Address has risk flags

Step 4: Phase 2 — Deep Tracking (Conditionally Triggered)

Step	MCP Tool	Parameters	Retrieved Data	Parallel
2a	info_onchain_get_address_transactions	address={address}, chain={chain}, min_value_usd=10000, limit=20	Large transactions (> $10k)	Yes
2b	info_onchain_trace_fund_flow	start_address={address}, chain={chain}, depth=3, min_value_usd=100000	Fund flow tracing (3-level depth, > $100k)	Yes

Both Tools called in parallel. min_value_usd thresholds are adaptively adjusted based on address size.

Adaptive Threshold Logic:

Address Total Balance	info_onchain_get_address_transactions min_value	info_onchain_trace_fund_flow min_value
< $100K	$1,000	$10,000
$100K – $1M	$10,000	$100,000
$1M – $100M	$100,000	$1,000,000
> $100M	$1,000,000	$10,000,000

Step 5: LLM Aggregation

---

Report Template

Basic Mode

## Address Analysis Report

> Address: `{address}`
> Chain: {chain}
> Query time: {timestamp}

### 1. Address Profile

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Address Label | {label} (e.g., Exchange Hot Wallet / Whale / Unknown / Hacker-linked) |
| Risk Score | {risk_score}/100 ({Low Risk/Medium Risk/High Risk}) |
| First Transaction | {first_tx_time} |
| Total Transactions | {tx_count} |
| Current Balance | ${total_balance_usd} |

### 2. Asset Holdings

| Token | Amount | Value (USD) | Share |
|-------|--------|-------------|-------|
| {token_1} | {amount} | ${value} | {pct}% |
| {token_2} | ... | ... | ... |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

**Holding Characteristics**: {LLM analyzes the holding structure, e.g., "Highly concentrated in ETH", "Diversified across multiple DeFi tokens", "Possible market maker"}

### 3. DeFi Positions (if available)

| Protocol | Type | Amount | Status |
|----------|------|--------|--------|
| {protocol} | {Lending/LP/Staking} | ${value} | {Healthy/Near Liquidation} |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

### 4. PnL Summary (if available)

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Realized PnL | ${realized_pnl} |
| Unrealized PnL | ${unrealized_pnl} |
| Win Rate | {win_rate}% |

Deep Tracking Mode (appended to Basic Mode)

### 5. Large Transaction History

> Filter: Amount > ${min_value_usd} | Most recent {count} transactions

| Time | Type | Amount | Counterparty | Counterparty Label |
|------|------|--------|--------------|-------------------|
| {time} | {In/Out/Contract Interaction} | ${value} | `{counterparty}` | {label/unknown} |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

**Transaction Pattern Analysis**:
{LLM analyzes transaction records and identifies patterns:}
- Frequent interactions with an exchange → likely depositing/withdrawing
- Large one-way outflows → possibly liquidating
- Interacting with many new addresses → possibly dispersing funds
- Regular fixed-amount transfers → possibly payroll/OTC

### 6. Fund Flow Tracing

> Trace depth: {depth} levels | Minimum amount: ${min_value_usd}

{address} (origin) ├── ${amount} → {addr_1} ({label_1}) │ ├── ${amount} → {addr_1a} ({label}) │ └── ${amount} → {addr_1b} ({label}) ├── ${amount} → {addr_2} ({label_2}) │ └── ${amount} → {addr_2a} ({label}) └── ${amount} → {addr_3} ({label_3})

**Fund Flow Analysis**:
{LLM analysis based on tracing results:}
- Ultimate destination of funds (exchange? mixer? DeFi protocol?)
- Any suspicious patterns (split transfers, circular transfers, obfuscation paths)
- Associated known entities

### ⚠️ Risk Warnings

{If the address has risk flags, prominently display:}
- ⚠️ This address is flagged as: {risk_label}
- ⚠️ Associated addresses involved in: {risk_detail}

---

Decision Logic

Condition	Assessment
risk_score > 70	High-risk address — warn user to exercise caution
risk_score 40-70	Medium risk — note some risk factors present
risk_score < 40	Low risk
Holding concentration > 80% in a single token	Flag "Highly concentrated holding"
DeFi lending health factor < 1.2	Near liquidation
Large outflow in past 24h > 50% of total balance	Flag "Recent large outflow"
Fund flow includes mixer addresses	Flag "Mixer involvement — high risk"
Fund flow includes OFAC-sanctioned addresses	Flag "Associated with sanctioned address"
trace_fund_flow returns empty	Possibly a new address or no large-enough transactions — handle normally

---

Error Handling

Error Type	Handling
Invalid address format	Prompt user to check the format; provide correct format examples
Cannot identify chain	Prompt user to specify the chain ("Which chain is this address on? ETH/BSC/TRX/BTC...")
info_onchain_get_address_info returns empty	Address may be new or have no on-chain activity; inform the user
info_onchain_trace_fund_flow unavailable (P1 phase)	Inform user "Fund tracing is still under development"; show transaction history only
info_onchain_get_address_transactions timeout	Reduce limit and retry, or show address profile only
All Tools fail	Return error message; suggest the user try again later

---

Cross-Skill Routing

User Follow-up Intent	Route To
"Is this address safe?"	gate-info-riskcheck
"On-chain data for this token"	gate-info-tokenonchain
"Which institution owns this address?"	gate-info-whaletracker
"Analyze XX coin for me"	gate-info-coinanalysis
"Why was there a large outflow?"	gate-news-eventexplain

---

Safety Rules

1. Privacy protection: Do not link on-chain addresses to specific natural persons (unless publicly labeled as institutional addresses)
2. Clear risk warnings: High-risk addresses must have prominent, unmistakable risk labels with reasons
3. No definitive characterization: Do not use terms like "criminal address" or "dirty money" — use objective language like "flagged as high risk" or "associated with suspicious activity"
4. Data source transparency: Label data sources (BlockInfo / Nansen / Arkham) must be attributed
5. Flag missing data: Fund tracing rolls out in phases; when unavailable, explicitly state it
6. Do not encourage stalking: If a user attempts to track many personal addresses for harassment purposes, prompt responsible use