gate-info-defianalysis

General Rules

⚠️ STOP — You MUST read and strictly follow the shared runtime rules before proceeding. Do NOT select or call any tool until all rules are read. These rules have the highest priority. → Read gate-runtime-rules.md → Also read info-news-runtime-rules.md for gate-info / gate-news-specific rules (tool degradation, report standards, security, routing degradation, per-skill version checks when scripts/ is present, and legacy wrapper routing).

• Only call MCP tools explicitly listed in this skill. Tools not documented here must NOT be called, even if they exist in the MCP server.
• Legacy / routing mode: when Step 0 emits __FALLBACK__, use only the MCP tools listed in this file. When Step 0 emits __ROUTE_CLI__, do not call those MCP tools; delegate to the mapped primary skill per Step 0.

The DeFi Ecosystem Analysis Skill. Routes to different sub-scenarios based on user intent (overview / single platform / yield / stablecoins / bridges / reserves / liquidation), each calling one or more MCP tools.

Trigger Scenarios: User asks about DeFi protocols, TVL, yield rates, stablecoins, cross-chain bridges, exchange reserves, liquidation distribution, etc.

Per-skill updates: This directory includes scripts/update-skill.sh and may include scripts/update-skill.ps1. ClawHub packages uploaded to the marketplace often omit update-skill.ps1 (upload-page restriction); GitHub / Bitbucket source trees keep both. Policy: info-news-runtime-rules.md §1. The Trigger update steps below apply in addition to gate-runtime-rules.md; when scripts are present, use this flow for version checks before execution.

Update check — user visibility: Technical failures during version check (missing script, sandbox, network, non-zero exit, no parseable Result= line) must not be explained to the user; continue with Execution per info-news-runtime-rules.md. Only successful check / apply outcomes may be summarized (including update_available / strict exit 3, which is still a success path that requires user confirmation before apply). Do not auto-download update-skill.* from the network. Static reference if .ps1 is missing: canonical scripts live in gate/gate-skills under skills/<name>/scripts/ (same <name> as frontmatter).

---

Step 0 — Wrapper routing probe

This legacy skill is a compatibility alias for the primary CLI skill gate-info-web3.

Before Trigger update, MCP tool selection, or any legacy Execution Workflow, run a deterministic shell probe:

PRIMARY_SKILL="gate-info-web3"
HAS_PRIMARY=0
for root in \
  "$HOME/.cursor/skills" \
  "$HOME/.codex/skills" \
  "$HOME/.openclaw/skills" \
  "$HOME/.agents/skills" \
  "$HOME/.gemini/antigravity/skills"
do
  if [ -f "$root/$PRIMARY_SKILL/SKILL.md" ]; then
    HAS_PRIMARY=1
    break
  fi
done

if command -v gate-cli >/dev/null 2>&1 && [ "$HAS_PRIMARY" = "1" ]; then
  echo "__ROUTE_CLI__"
else
  echo "__FALLBACK__"
fi

Interpretation:

• __ROUTE_CLI__ → stop here. Do not run Trigger update or the legacy MCP sections below. Follow https://github.com/gate/gate-skills/blob/master/skills/gate-info-web3/SKILL.md and its playbook contract. Carry over the minimum context: protocol/platform intent plus any available platform, token, asset, exchange, or symbol hints from the user.
• __FALLBACK__ → continue with Trigger update and the legacy MCP workflow in this file.

---

Trigger update (with Execution)

Default (PD / blocking): On each trigger, run check first without GATE_SKILL_UPDATE_MODE=auto. The script only compares local vs remote; if Result=update_available, it does not overwrite files. STOP — ask the user whether to update before any apply, run, or skill Execution. In sandboxes (e.g. Cursor), use full / all permissions when later running apply. This matches blocking update confirmation in the independent-script TEST_REPORT: blocking is enforced by these SKILL instructions plus check-only behavior (not by silent auto-apply).

Strict check (Agent / IDE — recommended on check): Use GATE_SKILL_CHECK_STRICT=1. When Result=update_available, check exits 3 and prints GATE_SKILL_CHECK_EXIT=3 — it stops only that shell step. Hard rule: after you ask the user, end this assistant turn; do not call apply, run, or MCP in the same message. run applies without a prior user step — do not use run in chat for the blocking flow; use check → user confirms → apply.

Step 1 — Check

Install root: check / apply read $DEST/SKILL.md. Typical $SKILL_ROOT: $HOME/.cursor/skills/<name>/, $HOME/.codex/skills/<name>/, $HOME/.openclaw/skills/<name>/, $HOME/.agents/skills/<name>/, $HOME/.gemini/antigravity/skills/<name>/. Single-arg: the script resolves DEST in that order when SKILL.md exists; otherwise DEST is scripts/../. Workspace-only trees need two-arg check / apply with explicit DEST.

Agent selection rules (run at most one of the fenced examples below; choose by OS and files under $SKILL_ROOT/scripts/):

• macOS / Linux / WSL / Git Bash: If update-skill.sh exists → use only the Bash example.
• Windows (native PowerShell): If update-skill.ps1 exists → use only the PowerShell example.
• Windows without .ps1 (typical ClawHub install): If only update-skill.sh exists → try WSL or Git Bash (bash) using the same command shape as the Bash example. If bash is unavailable or execution fails → skip Step 1 silently (no script stderr or “version check failed” message to the user); proceed to Execution.
• Neither script exists: Skip Step 1 silently; proceed to Execution. Do not invent GATE_SKILL_CONFIRM_TOKEN or run apply / revoke-pending.

Bash (blocking — no auto; example Cursor):

GATE_SKILL_CHECK_STRICT=1 bash "$HOME/.cursor/skills/gate-info-defianalysis/scripts/update-skill.sh" check "gate-info-defianalysis"

PowerShell:

$env:GATE_SKILL_CHECK_STRICT = '1'
powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File "$env:USERPROFILE\.cursor\skills\gate-info-defianalysis\scripts\update-skill.ps1" check "gate-info-defianalysis"

Result semantics: skipped = no action. update_available = remote newer; with blocking flow, do not apply until the user agrees. check_failed = could not compare — proceed with current version per info-news-runtime-rules.md; do not surface technical check failure details to the user.

Agent parse (stdout): GATE_SKILL_UPDATE_AGENT_ACTION=…. BLOCK_UNTIL_USER_CONFIRMS_UPDATE → Step 2 before Execution. CONTINUE_SKILL_EXECUTION → no block from the check script.

Step 2 — Confirm or Reject (blocking)

Runtime: Use the same shell family for Step 2 as for Step 1 (Bash vs PowerShell). If Step 1 was skipped, do not run apply or revoke-pending.

If update_available:

1. STOP — do NOT proceed to Execution yet.

2. Inform the user (e.g. newer version available; summarize if helpful).

3. Wait for the user’s reply — blocking step.

   Hard rule (Cursor / Agent): When check reports update_available, or BLOCK_UNTIL_USER_CONFIRMS_UPDATE, or strict exit 3, end this turn after asking. Only in the user’s next message run apply (if they agree) or revoke-pending (if they decline). Do not chain apply in the same turn as check for this flow.

   • User agrees → run apply with GATE_SKILL_CONFIRM_TOKEN from strict check stdout when required, then Execution.
   • User declines → revoke-pending, then Execution on the current install.

Two-step gate (strict check): apply / run (without GATE_SKILL_UPDATE_MODE=auto) fail until GATE_SKILL_CONFIRM_TOKEN matches .gate-skill-apply-token. User decline → revoke-pending.

GATE_SKILL_CONFIRM_TOKEN="<paste from check stdout>" bash "$HOME/.cursor/skills/gate-info-defianalysis/scripts/update-skill.sh" apply "gate-info-defianalysis"

bash "$HOME/.cursor/skills/gate-info-defianalysis/scripts/update-skill.sh" revoke-pending "gate-info-defianalysis"

$env:GATE_SKILL_CONFIRM_TOKEN = '<paste from check stdout>'
powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File "$env:USERPROFILE\.cursor\skills\gate-info-defianalysis\scripts\update-skill.ps1" apply "gate-info-defianalysis"

powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File "$env:USERPROFILE\.cursor\skills\gate-info-defianalysis\scripts\update-skill.ps1" revoke-pending "gate-info-defianalysis"

If Step 1 was not strict (no pending token): apply without GATE_SKILL_CONFIRM_TOKEN is allowed.

If skipped or check_failed: no update step; proceed to Execution.

Optional — GATE_SKILL_UPDATE_MODE=auto

For CI / unattended automation only: setting GATE_SKILL_UPDATE_MODE=auto on check makes the script apply immediately when the remote is newer — no user confirmation and incompatible with blocking update confirmation tests. Do not use auto on check when reproducing the blocking PD flow.

Parameters

• name: Frontmatter name above; must match skills/<name>/ on gate-skills.
• Invoke: Use $SKILL_ROOT/scripts/update-skill.sh (or .ps1) where $SKILL_ROOT/SKILL.md is this skill — e.g. ~/.cursor/skills/<name>, ~/.codex/skills/<name>, ~/.openclaw/skills/<name>, ~/.agents/skills/<name>, ~/.gemini/antigravity/skills/<name>; do not treat ~/.cursor (or any host root without skills/<name>/SKILL.md) as the install. With one arg, the script resolves $SKILL_ROOT in that order before falling back to the script’s directory; workspace installs need explicit DEST. Two-arg check / apply / revoke-pending: canonical order is absolute DEST (skill root) first, then name; update-skill.sh / update-skill.ps1 auto-swap when only one normalized path contains SKILL.md (e.g. agent passes name then path).
• ClawHub vs full tree: Installs without update-skill.ps1 may copy it from gate/gate-skills under skills/<name>/scripts/ (manual only; agents must not auto-download).

Do not dump raw script logs into the user-facing reply except when debugging. On check exit 3 (strict), do not run Execution until Step 2 is resolved. On check_failed or apply failure, still run Execution when appropriate per runtime rules.

---

MCP Dependencies

Legacy path only — this section applies when Step 0 emitted __FALLBACK__.

Required MCP Servers

MCP Server	Status
Gate-Info	✅ Required

MCP Tools Used

Query Operations (Read-only) — use by sub-scenario; do not call tools outside the active scenario.

• info_platformmetrics_get_defi_overview
• info_platformmetrics_search_platforms
• info_platformmetrics_get_platform_info
• info_platformmetrics_get_platform_history
• info_platformmetrics_get_yield_pools
• info_platformmetrics_get_stablecoin_info
• info_platformmetrics_get_bridge_metrics
• info_platformmetrics_get_exchange_reserves
• info_platformmetrics_get_liquidation_heatmap
• info_coin_get_coin_info

Authentication

• API Key Required: No
• Credentials Source: None; this skill uses read-only Gate Info / Gate News MCP access only.

Installation Check

• Required: Gate-Info
• Install: Use the local Gate MCP installation flow for the current host IDE before continuing.
• Continue only after the required Gate MCP server is available in the current environment.

Routing Rules

Legacy path only — when Step 0 emitted __ROUTE_CLI__, routing is delegated to gate-info-web3.

User Intent	Keywords	Action
DeFi overview / TVL ranking	"DeFi overview" "TVL ranking" "top DeFi protocols"	Execute Sub-scenario A: Overview
Single platform deep-dive	"Uniswap TVL" "Aave metrics" "Compound info"	Execute Sub-scenario B: Platform Detail
Yield / APY query	"best yield" "USDC APY" "lending rates" "where to earn"	Execute Sub-scenario C: Yield Pools
Stablecoin analysis	"USDT market cap" "stablecoin ranking" "USDC circulation"	Execute Sub-scenario D: Stablecoins
Cross-chain bridge	"bridge volume" "top bridges" "cross-chain TVL"	Execute Sub-scenario E: Bridges
Exchange reserves	"Binance BTC reserves" "exchange reserves" "proof of reserves"	Execute Sub-scenario F: Exchange Reserves
Liquidation analysis	"BTC liquidation heatmap" "where are liquidations" "liquidation density"	Execute Sub-scenario G: Liquidation Heatmap
Coin fundamentals (no DeFi focus)	"analyze SOL" "how is BTC"	Route to gate-info-coinanalysis
Market overview	"how's the market"	Route to gate-info-marketoverview

---

Execution Workflow

Legacy path only — this section applies when Step 0 emitted __FALLBACK__.

Step 0: Multi-Dimension Intent Check

• If the query is about DeFi/platform metrics, proceed with this Skill.
• If the query also involves coin fundamentals, technicals, or news beyond DeFi scope, route to gate-info-research (if available).

Step 1: Intent Recognition & Parameter Extraction

Extract from user input:

• platform_name (optional): Protocol name (e.g., Uniswap, Aave, Lido)
• symbol (optional): Token/stablecoin symbol (e.g., USDC, USDT, ETH)
• chain (optional): Blockchain filter (e.g., Ethereum, Arbitrum)
• exchange (optional): Exchange name (e.g., Binance, OKX)

Step 2: Call MCP Tools by Sub-scenario

Sub-scenario A: DeFi Overview

Step	MCP Tool	Parameters	Retrieved Data	Parallel
1a	info_platformmetrics_get_defi_overview	category="all"	Total TVL, volume, fees across DeFi/CEX/DEX	Yes
1b	info_platformmetrics_search_platforms	sort_by="tvl", limit=10	Top 10 platforms by TVL	Yes

Sub-scenario B: Platform Detail

Step	MCP Tool	Parameters	Retrieved Data	Parallel
1a	info_platformmetrics_get_platform_info	platform_name={name}, scope="full"	Full platform metrics (TVL, volume, fees, chains)	Yes
1b	info_platformmetrics_get_platform_history	platform_name={name}, metrics=["tvl","volume"]	Historical trend	Yes
1c	info_coin_get_coin_info	query={token_symbol}	Platform's native token info	Yes

Sub-scenario C: Yield Pools

Step	MCP Tool	Parameters	Retrieved Data
1	info_platformmetrics_get_yield_pools	project={name}, chain={chain}, symbol={symbol}, sort_by="apy", limit=20	Yield pool rankings with APY, TVL

Sub-scenario D: Stablecoins

Step	MCP Tool	Parameters	Retrieved Data
1	info_platformmetrics_get_stablecoin_info	symbol={symbol}, chain={chain}, limit=10	Stablecoin ranking or single coin detail with chain distribution

Sub-scenario E: Bridges

Step	MCP Tool	Parameters	Retrieved Data
1	info_platformmetrics_get_bridge_metrics	bridge_name={name}, chain={chain}	Bridge ranking or single bridge chain breakdown

Sub-scenario F: Exchange Reserves

Step	MCP Tool	Parameters	Retrieved Data
1	info_platformmetrics_get_exchange_reserves	exchange={exchange}, asset={asset}	Exchange on-chain reserves (BTC, ETH, etc.)

Sub-scenario G: Liquidation Heatmap

Step	MCP Tool	Parameters	Retrieved Data
1	info_platformmetrics_get_liquidation_heatmap	symbol={symbol}, exchange={exchange}	Liquidation density by price range

Step 3: LLM Aggregation

Generate sub-scenario-specific analysis. For overview, provide market context; for detail, provide competitive positioning; for yield, highlight risk/reward.

Step 4: Progressive Loading (Bridges & Stablecoins)

For Bridges and Stablecoins, use a list-first, detail-on-demand pattern:

1. First call (no bridge_name / narrow symbol): ranking list — summary without full chain breakdown.
2. Second call (user follow-up): specific bridge_name or symbol — full chain-level details.

---

Report Template

Legacy path only — this section applies when Step 0 emitted __FALLBACK__.

Template A: DeFi Overview

## DeFi Ecosystem Overview

> Generated: {timestamp}

### Market Summary

| Metric | Value | 24h Change |
|--------|-------|------------|
| Total DeFi TVL | ${total_tvl} | {change}% |
| DEX 24h Volume | ${dex_volume} | {change}% |
| Total Fees (24h) | ${total_fees} | {change}% |
| Stablecoin Market Cap | ${stablecoin_mcap} | {change}% |

### Top 10 Protocols by TVL

| Rank | Protocol | Category | TVL | 24h Change | Chain |
|------|----------|----------|-----|------------|-------|
| 1 | {name} | {category} | ${tvl} | {change}% | {chains} |

### Analysis

{LLM assessment: DeFi market trend, capital flows, notable shifts}

> Data sourced from Gate Info MCP. Does not constitute investment advice.

Template B: Platform Detail

## {platform_name} Deep Dive

> Generated: {timestamp}

### Key Metrics

| Metric | Value | Rank |
|--------|-------|------|
| TVL | ${tvl} | #{rank} |
| 24h Volume | ${volume} | — |
| 24h Fees | ${fees} | — |

### TVL Trend

{Describe trend from historical data}

### Token Info ({symbol})

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Price | ${price} |
| Market Cap | ${market_cap} |
| FDV | ${fdv} |

### Analysis

{LLM competitive analysis}

> Data sourced from Gate Info MCP. Does not constitute investment advice.

Templates C–G (Yield / Stablecoin / Bridge / Reserve / Liquidation)

• Summary metrics at top
• Ranked table of data
• 2–3 sentence LLM analysis
• Standard disclaimer

---

Decision Logic

Condition	Assessment / next step
Generic DeFi market, TVL leaderboard, or “top protocols”	Sub-scenario A (Overview)
User names a specific protocol (Uniswap, Aave, ...)	Sub-scenario B (Platform detail)
Yield, APY, lending, “where to earn”	Sub-scenario C (Yield pools)
Stablecoins, peg, circulation, ranking	Sub-scenario D; use progressive loading per Step 4
Bridges, cross-chain TVL, bridge volume	Sub-scenario E; list-first, detail on follow-up
Exchange reserves, PoR, “exchange BTC holdings”	Sub-scenario F
Liquidations, heatmap, density by price	Sub-scenario G
Ambiguous intent	Ask one clarifying question or default to A

---

Error Handling

Error Type	Handling
Platform name not found	Suggest similar platform names; ask user to verify
Single Tool fails	Skip that section; note "Data temporarily unavailable"
All Tools fail	Return error; suggest user try again later
No yield pools match criteria	Broaden search (remove chain/symbol filter); inform user
Exchange not supported	List supported exchanges; ask user to choose another
Symbol not recognized	Try matching via info_coin_get_coin_info; ask user if unclear

---

Cross-Skill Routing

User Follow-up Intent	Route To
"Analyze the token"	gate-info-coinanalysis
"Technical analysis of the token"	gate-info-trendanalysis
"Is this protocol safe?"	gate-info-riskcheck
"On-chain data for the token"	gate-info-tokenonchain
"Any news about this protocol?"	gate-news-briefing
"How does macro affect DeFi?"	gate-info-macroimpact
"How's the market overall?"	gate-info-marketoverview

---

Safety Rules

1. No yield guarantees: APY/yield data is historical and subject to change; state clearly that past rates do not guarantee future returns.
2. Smart contract risk: When showing yield pools or protocols, note that DeFi carries smart contract risk.
3. No endorsement: Listing a protocol does not constitute an endorsement; maintain neutrality.
4. Reserve disclaimers: Exchange reserve data is on-chain observable but may not reflect total assets.
5. Liquidation data: Liquidation heatmaps show estimated levels, not guaranteed triggers.
6. Data transparency: Label data source, update frequency, and known limitations.
7. Age & eligibility: Intended for users aged 18 or above with full civil capacity in their jurisdiction.
8. Data flow: The host agent processes user prompts; this skill directs read-only Gate-Info MCP tools listed above. The LLM formats answers from tool results. Aside from those MCP calls and the documented skill-update flow (GitHub URLs in General Rules and info-news-runtime-rules.md), this skill does not invoke additional third-party data services.