code-review
Installation
Summary
Code review framework following Sentry engineering practices for pull requests and code quality assessment.
- Covers six key problem areas: runtime errors, performance bottlenecks, side effects, backwards compatibility, ORM query issues, and security vulnerabilities
- Includes design assessment guidance for component interactions, architectural alignment, and requirement conflicts
- Requires appropriate test coverage across functional, integration, and end-to-end tests with verification of edge cases
- Flags changes involving database schema, API contracts, framework adoption, performance-critical paths, and security-sensitive code for senior review
- Provides feedback tone guidelines emphasizing politeness and actionable suggestions, with approval criteria focused on risk reduction over perfection
SKILL.md
Sentry Code Review
Follow these guidelines when reviewing code for Sentry projects.
Review Checklist
Identifying Problems
Look for these issues in code changes:
- Runtime errors: Potential exceptions, null pointer issues, out-of-bounds access
- Performance: Unbounded O(n²) operations, N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations
- Side effects: Unintended behavioral changes affecting other components
- Backwards compatibility: Breaking API changes without migration path
- ORM queries: Complex Django ORM with unexpected query performance
- Security vulnerabilities: Injection, XSS, access control gaps, secrets exposure
Design Assessment
- Do component interactions make logical sense?
- Does the change align with existing project architecture?
- Are there conflicts with current requirements or goals?
Test Coverage
Every PR should have appropriate test coverage:
- Functional tests for business logic
- Integration tests for component interactions
- End-to-end tests for critical user paths
Verify tests cover actual requirements and edge cases. Avoid excessive branching or looping in test code.
Long-Term Impact
Flag for senior engineer review when changes involve:
- Database schema modifications
- API contract changes
- New framework or library adoption
- Performance-critical code paths
- Security-sensitive functionality
Feedback Guidelines
Tone
- Be polite and empathetic
- Provide actionable suggestions, not vague criticism
- Phrase as questions when uncertain: "Have you considered...?"
Approval
- Approve when only minor issues remain
- Don't block PRs for stylistic preferences
- Remember: the goal is risk reduction, not perfect code
Common Patterns to Flag
Python/Django
# Bad: N+1 query
for user in users:
print(user.profile.name) # Separate query per user
# Good: Prefetch related
users = User.objects.prefetch_related('profile')
TypeScript/React
// Bad: Missing dependency in useEffect
useEffect(() => {
fetchData(userId);
}, []); // userId not in deps
// Good: Include all dependencies
useEffect(() => {
fetchData(userId);
}, [userId]);
Security
# Bad: SQL injection risk
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")
# Good: Parameterized query
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", [user_id])
References
Weekly Installs
691
Repository
getsentry/skillsGitHub Stars
500
First Seen
Jan 20, 2026
Security Audits
Installed on
opencode628
codex616
gemini-cli616
github-copilot609
kimi-cli587
amp587