refactor-plan
Refactor Planning
Process
1. Understand Problem
- Get detailed description from user
- Ask about potential solutions they've considered
- Explore codebase to verify current state
2. Define Scope
- Interview user about implementation details
- Present alternative approaches — each approach as an option with trade-offs in description; use preview to show code sketches when applicable. Use AskUserQuestion when available; otherwise present as a numbered list.
- Define exactly what changes and what stays
- Check test coverage in affected areas
3. Break Down Work
Apply Martin Fowler's principle: "Make each refactoring step as small as possible, so that you can always see the program working."
- Create list of tiny commits
- Each commit leaves codebase working
- Sequential, not parallel changes
4. Create GitHub Issue
gh issue create --title "Refactor: <title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Problem Statement
The problem from the developer's perspective.
## Solution
The approach from the developer's perspective.
## Commits
Detailed plan broken into the tiniest commits possible. Each leaves codebase working.
1. Add new interface type
2. Update service to accept new interface (keep old code path)
3. Add tests for new code path
4. Update consumers to use new interface
5. Remove old code path
## Implementation Decisions
- Modules to build/modify and their interfaces
- Architectural decisions
- Schema changes
- API contracts
Do NOT include file paths or code snippets -- they go stale.
## Testing Decisions
- What makes a good test (behavior, not implementation)
- Which modules need tests
- Prior art: similar test patterns in the codebase
## Out of Scope
What is explicitly not included.
EOF
)"
Rules
- Each commit must keep codebase functional
- No implementation details in plan (focus on behavior)
- Verify test coverage before starting
- Get user approval on approach
Error Handling
gh issue createfails -- rungh auth statusto verify auth; offer to print as markdown instead- Test coverage insufficient -- note gaps and add "add tests for X" as first commit
- Scope larger than expected -- revise plan with user before proceeding
See Also
- tdd -- implement refactored code using test-driven development
More from helderberto/skills
explain-code
Explains code with visual diagrams and analogies. Use when explaining how code works, teaching about a codebase, or when the user asks "how does this work?" Don't use for modifying code, fixing bugs, or generating new implementations.
45ship
Commit and push changes using atomic commits. Use when user asks to "ship", "commit and push", or requests committing and pushing changes. Don't use for creating pull requests or reviewing changes before committing.
45safe-repo
Check for sensitive data in repository. Use when user asks to "check for sensitive data", "/safe-repo", or wants to verify no company/credential data is in the repository. Don't use for general code review, adding .gitignore entries, or scanning non-git directories.
41lint
Run linting and formatting checks. Use when user asks to "run linter", "/lint", "check linting", "fix lint errors", or requests code linting/formatting. Don't use for running tests, type-checking only, or projects without a lint script in package.json.
40tdd
Guides test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants test-first development, or requests TDD workflow. Don't use for writing tests after implementation, adding tests to existing untested code, or one-off test fixes.
40commit
Create git commits following repository style. Use when user asks to "create a commit", "commit changes", "/commit", or requests committing code to git. Don't use for pushing code, creating pull requests, or reviewing changes.
38