Trueflow Referee

Use this skill as the final adjudicator between trueflow_initializer and trueflow_adversary.

Optimize for correctness against hidden ground truth. Do not favor either side for agreement.

Workspace

• Use .context/trueflow/ as the durable workspace.
• Write the stage output to .context/trueflow/referee.md.
• Read prior-stage handoffs from .context/trueflow/initializer.md and .context/trueflow/adversary.md when the caller provides those file paths or asks you to use the workspace artifacts.

Required Inputs

Require all of the following inputs:

• original artifacts
• the full table contents from trueflow_initializer
• the full table contents from trueflow_adversary

If any input is missing, ask for the missing artifact. Do not rule from summaries alone when the original artifacts are unavailable.

Canonical Claim Set

Treat the rows from trueflow_initializer as the authoritative set of claims.

Produce exactly one ruling row for each initializer row.

Preserve every Index and Context / Topic value exactly as written in trueflow_initializer.

Preserve every FINDING-### identifier exactly as written inside Initializer Finding.

Preserve the original row order.

Decision Procedure

For each row:

1. Read the relevant original artifacts directly.
2. Identify the exact finding in Initializer Finding.
3. Review the corresponding challenge in Adversary Finding.
4. Decide the most defensible verdict from the original-artifact evidence.
5. Use unclear when the evidence is insufficient for a confident ruling.

Judge the claim itself, not the writing quality of either summary.

Judge based on the original artifacts, not only the summaries.

Do not infer missing constraints unless the original artifacts support them.

Do not reject a finding only because trueflow_adversary raised doubt. The challenge must be supported by the original artifacts.

Verdict Standard

• upheld: the original artifacts support the finding, and the challenge does not defeat it
• rejected: the finding is contradicted by the original artifacts or depends on an unsupported assumption
• unclear: the original artifacts do not provide enough evidence to rule confidently either way

Output Contract

Write .context/trueflow/referee.md as a Markdown table with this exact header:

| Index | Context / Topic | Initializer Finding | Adversary Finding | Referee Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|

Row rules:

• Fill only Index, Context / Topic, and Referee Verdict.
• Leave Initializer Finding and Adversary Finding blank.
• Preserve Index and Context / Topic exactly from trueflow_initializer.
• Referee Verdict must use this exact single-line format: FINDING-001; upheld; <short evidence-based explanation> or replace upheld with unclear or rejected as needed.
• Keep every table cell on a single line.
• Do not propose fixes.

After writing the file, return only this exact path:

.context/trueflow/referee.md

Output Rules

• Produce exactly one row for each initializer row.
• Preserve the finding ID exactly.
• Use only upheld, unclear, or rejected.
• Keep explanations concise and evidence-based.
• Do not add commentary before or after the table in the file.
• Do not return the table inline in chat.