Code Review Checklist

Exclusive to: reviewer agent

MCP Helpers (Brain + Memory)

🧠 Gemini-Bridge — Deep Code Analysis

mcp_gemini-bridge_consult_gemini(query="Review this code for best practices, security, and performance: [code snippet]", directory=".")

🌉 Open-Bridge — Alternative Analysis

mcp_open-bridge_consult_gemini(query="Review this code for best practices, security, and performance: [code snippet]", directory=".")

💻 Codex-Bridge — Code-Focused Review

mcp_codex-bridge_consult_codex(query="Analyze this code for bugs, anti-patterns, and improvements: [code]", directory=".")

📚 Context7 (Memory) — Up-to-Date Docs

Lookup best practices and anti-patterns:

mcp_context7_resolve-library-id(libraryName="[library]", query="best practices")
mcp_context7_query-docs(libraryId="/[resolved-id]", query="[specific pattern to validate]")

Validation Loop (MANDATORY)

Before completing any review, verify the codebase passes all checks:

composer test           # All PHP tests pass
npm run types          # No TypeScript errors
npm run lint           # No linting errors
./vendor/bin/pint --test  # PHP style OK

Report any failures as Critical findings.

Instructions

1. Review against project standards in docs/code-standards.md
2. Run through the checklist below
3. Report issues by severity (Critical → Warning → Suggestion)

Review Checklist

✅ Correctness

• Logic handles edge cases
• Error handling is appropriate
• Types are correct (no any unless justified)
• Tests cover new/changed behavior
• No dead code or unused imports

🔒 Security (OWASP)

• No secrets or credentials in code
• User input validated and sanitized
• Authorization checks in place
• No SQL injection (use Eloquent/query builder)
• No XSS (proper escaping, sanitization)
• CSRF protection enabled
• Rate limiting considered

⚡ Performance

• No N+1 queries (use eager loading: with())
• No unnecessary database calls
• Large datasets are paginated
• Indexes exist for filtered/joined columns

🧹 Maintainability

• Follows patterns in docs/code-standards.md
• Names are clear and consistent
• No unnecessary complexity
• DRY — no copy-paste duplication

🎨 Frontend

• Uses existing shadcn/ui components
• Loading and error states handled
• Accessible (keyboard, labels, contrast)
• Responsive (mobile + desktop)

📝 Documentation

• Code comments for non-obvious logic
• Docs updated if behavior changed
• Types documented with JSDoc if complex

Laravel Security Checks

Check	Verify
Mass assignment	$fillable or $guarded defined
Authorization	Policy or Gate used
Validation	FormRequest with rules
CSRF	@csrf in forms
SQL injection	No raw queries with user input

React Security Checks

Check	Verify
XSS	No dangerouslySetInnerHTML
Props	TypeScript interfaces used
Secrets	No sensitive data in client

Severity Guide

Level	Criteria	Action
🚨 Critical	Security flaw, data loss, breaks functionality	Block merge
⚠️ Warning	Performance issue, code smell, missing test	Request fix
💡 Suggestion	Style improvement, better pattern	Optional

Output Format

## 🔍 Review Summary
[One paragraph overview]

## 🚨 Critical (must fix)
1. [Issue]: [File:Line] — [Why critical]

## ⚠️ Warnings (should fix)
1. [Issue]: [File:Line] — [Recommendation]

## 💡 Suggestions (nice to have)
1. [Suggestion]: [File:Line] — [Improvement]

## ✅ What's Good
- [Positive observation]

Examples

• "Review this PR before merge"
• "Check this code for security issues"
• "Audit changes for performance"