mkt-lp-optimization
Landing Page Conversion Optimization
Horizontal skill — optimizes the conversion layer where communication meets action.
Inputs Required
- Landing page URL or description of the page
- ICP research from
.agents/mkt/icp-research.md(recommended — VoC language strengthens copy) - Traffic source context (where visitors come from)
Output
- Optimization recommendations with specific copy/structure changes
- For new pages: complete page structure with copy
Quality Gate
Before delivering, verify:
- Headline scores ≥3 out of 4 on the U's (Useful, Unique, Urgent, Ultra-specific)
- Message matches the traffic source (headline echoes the ad/link that brought them)
- One primary CTA per page (secondary CTAs don't compete)
- Trust signals appear within scroll-distance of every CTA
- Form has ≤5 fields (or justified why more are needed)
Chain Position
Horizontal — works with mkt-icp-research (audience data), mkt-copywriting (copy principles), mkt-experiment (test design)
Before Starting
Step 0: Product Context
Check for .agents/mkt/product-context.md. If available, read for product details and accuracy.
Required Artifacts
None — can audit any page standalone.
Optional Artifacts
| Artifact | Source | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
icp-research.md |
mkt-icp-research | VoC data for persuasion |
product-context.md |
mkt-copywriting | Product details for accuracy |
experiment-*.md |
mkt-experiment | Test design context |
Core Frameworks
4-U Headline Formula
| U | Question | Scoring |
|---|---|---|
| Useful | Does it communicate clear value? | Y/N |
| Unique | Could a competitor use this headline? | Y/N (N = good) |
| Urgent | Is there a reason to act now? | Y/N |
| Ultra-specific | Does it include a number or concrete outcome? | Y/N |
80% of visitors won't read past the headline. Generate 10+ variations, score each.
PAS Copy Framework
- Problem: Lead with pain in the audience's own language. If
.agents/mkt/icp-research.mdexists, use VoC quotes directly. - Agitate: What happens if they don't solve this? Make consequences vivid.
- Solve: Your product as the relief. Benefits, not features.
Message Match
Check: does the landing page headline echo the exact promise from the ad/email/link? Broken promise = instant bounce.
WebSearch directive: If auditing a live page, search site:[domain] "[headline text]" to find the ads/links driving traffic. Verify message match.
First-Person CTA
"Get MY guide" > "Get YOUR guide" (90% more clicks). Formula: [Action Verb] + [What They Get]
Quick Reference
Social Proof Hierarchy (most → least powerful)
- Testimonials with specific results ("Increased revenue 40% in 3 months")
- Case studies with before/after numbers
- Customer count ("Join 10,000+ teams")
- Media mentions / press logos
- Expert endorsements
- Customer logos
Cognitive Bias Stack
| Bias | How to Apply |
|---|---|
| Loss aversion | "Don't miss..." / limited genuine availability |
| Social proof | Testimonials near CTAs, user counts |
| Anchoring | Show higher price first, then actual price |
| Reciprocity | Give free value before asking (lead magnet, calculator) |
| Authority | Expert quotes, certification badges, press logos |
Form Rules
- ≤5 fields. Every additional field costs ~10% conversions
- Start with just email. Use progressive profiling for the rest
- Each field must justify its existence — if you can ask later, do
Trust Signals
Cluster near CTAs and forms: security badges, money-back guarantee, privacy link, contact info.
Testing Priority
Test in this order (highest impact first):
- Headlines (biggest swing)
- Offers (what you're promising)
- CTAs (text, color, placement)
- Page layout
- Form fields
Use mkt-experiment for proper test design with success/kill thresholds and sample size validation.
Workflows
New Landing Page
- Read ICP research (if available) for VoC language and pain points
- Define primary conversion goal (one per page)
- Generate 10+ headline variations using 4-U formula
- Structure body with PAS framework
- Add social proof (strongest above fold)
- Design form (minimal fields)
- Place trust signals near every CTA
- Verify message match with traffic source
- Run through quality gate checklist
Optimization Audit
- Check message match between traffic sources and headline
- Score headline against 4-U formula
- Audit social proof: placement, specificity, relevance
- Count form fields — can any be removed?
- Check mobile experience (thumb zone CTAs, load time)
- Identify highest-impact fix
- Design A/B test via
mkt-experiment
Artifact Frontmatter
When saving optimization artifacts, use this frontmatter:
---
skill: mkt-lp-optimization
version: 1
date: [today's date]
status: draft
---
On re-run: rename existing artifact to
[name].v[N].mdand create new with incremented version.
References
| Reference | Use For |
|---|---|
| core-principles.md | Headlines, value props, CTAs, forms, message match, PAS |
| social-proof-trust.md | Social proof hierarchy, biases, trust signals |
| ux-design.md | Visual hierarchy, mobile optimization |
| advanced-psychology.md | Headline formulas, close sequences, pricing, urgency |
| testing-optimization.md | A/B testing, tracking |
| implementation-checklist.md | Pre-launch checklists |