Skill: modernize-move

Detect and modernize outdated Move V1 syntax, patterns, and APIs to Move V2+. Preserves correctness through tiered transformations with test verification after each tier.

Essential Principles

Five non-negotiable rules for every modernization:

Test safety net is mandatory WHY: Modernization must preserve behavior. No tests = no safety net. If no tests exist, invoke generate-tests skill first to create comprehensive tests before making any changes.
Analyze before modifying WHY: The user must see exactly what will change and confirm the scope. Never surprise-edit code. Present the full analysis report and wait for confirmation.
Tiered execution order WHY: Syntax changes (Tier 1) are zero-risk. API migrations (Tier 3) change semantics. Always apply safest changes first so riskier changes build on a clean, verified foundation.
Verify after each tier WHY: If tests break, you know exactly which tier caused it. Revert that tier and investigate before proceeding. Never apply the next tier on a broken baseline.
Preserve error code values WHY: Tests use #[expected_failure(abort_code = N)]. Changing numeric values breaks tests silently. When creating named constants, the numeric value MUST match the original literal.

When to Use This Skill

Upgrading Move V1 contracts to V2 syntax
Migrating public(friend) to package fun
Converting vector::borrow to index notation
Converting while loops with counters to for range loops
Replacing manual vector iteration with stdlib inline functions (vector::for_each_ref, vector::map, vector::fold, etc.) and lambdas
Replacing magic abort numbers with named constants
Migrating legacy coin/TokenV1 to modern fungible_asset/Digital Assets
Converting EventHandle to #[event] pattern
Upgrading custom signed integer workarounds to native i8-i256 types

When NOT to Use This Skill

Writing new contracts from scratch — use write-contracts
Fixing bugs or adding features — modernization is structural, not functional
Optimizing gas usage — use analyze-gas-optimization
Auditing security — use security-audit (run AFTER modernization)

Workflow

Phase 1: Analyze Contract

Entry: User provides a Move contract or project to modernize.

Actions:

Read all contract source files (.move files in sources/)
Scan for V1 patterns using detection rules from detection-rules.md:
- Grep for Tier 1 patterns (syntax) — highest confidence, most common
- Grep for Tier 2 patterns (visibility, errors, events)
- Grep for Tier 3 patterns (API migrations) — flag for manual review
Cross-reference coupled patterns (T3-09+T3-10)
Categorize each finding: line number, rule ID, pattern name, proposed change, tier, confidence
Build the Analysis Report

Exit: Analysis Report ready for presentation.

Phase 2: Present Analysis (GATE 1)

Entry: Analysis Report complete.

Actions:

Present the full Analysis Report to the user in this format:

## Modernization Analysis Report

### Summary
- Tier 1 (Syntax): X findings
- Tier 2 (Visibility & Errors): X findings
- Tier 3 (API Migrations): X findings

### Findings

| # | File:Line | Rule | Pattern | Proposed Change | Tier | Confidence |
|---|-----------|------|---------|-----------------|------|------------|
| 1 | src/mod.move:15 | T1-01 | vector::borrow | → index notation | 1 | High |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

### Tier 3 Warnings (if any)
- T3-03: coin → fungible_asset migration is a major rewrite (X locations)

Ask the user to choose scope:
- syntax-only (Tier 1 only) — zero risk, just cleaner syntax
- standard (Tier 1 + Tier 2) — recommended default, syntax + visibility + error constants
- full (all tiers) — includes API migrations, higher risk
Highlight any Tier 3 items that require major rewrites
If scope includes Tier 3, ask the user about deployment context:
- Compatible — Upgrading an already-deployed contract. Breaking changes are excluded even if the scope includes them. Rules marked ⚠ Breaking are skipped.
- Fresh deploy — New deployment or willing to redeploy. All changes in the selected scope are applied including breaking changes.

Exit: User has confirmed scope (and deployment context if Tier 3 is included). Do NOT proceed until confirmed.

Phase 3: Establish Test Safety Net

Entry: User confirmed scope.

Actions:

Search for existing tests:
- #[test_only] modules within source files
- *_tests.move files
- tests/ directory
If no tests found: stop and invoke generate-tests skill to create comprehensive tests first, then return here
Run aptos move test to establish a passing baseline
Record baseline: number of tests, all passing status

Exit: All tests pass. Baseline recorded. If tests fail pre-modernization, stop and address test failures first — do not modernize on a broken test suite.

Phase 4: Apply Transformations (with Feedback Loops)

Entry: Test baseline established.

Actions — apply in tier order:

Tier 1 (if scope includes it — always):

Apply all Tier 1 syntax changes per transformation-guide.md
Run aptos move test
If tests fail → revert all Tier 1 changes, investigate which specific change caused failure, fix and retry

Tier 2 (if scope is standard or full): 4. Apply all Tier 2 changes per transformation guide 5. Run aptos move test 6. If tests fail → revert all Tier 2 changes, investigate and fix

Tier 3 (if scope is full only): 7. Apply Tier 3 changes ONE AT A TIME (not all at once)

If deployment context is compatible: skip any rule marked ⚠ Breaking. Add to the skipped list with reason "breaking change, excluded in compatible mode."
If deployment context is fresh deploy: apply all rules in scope normally.

Run aptos move test after EACH individual Tier 3 change
If tests fail → revert that specific change, note it as skipped, proceed to next Tier 3 item

Exit: All approved changes applied, all tests passing.

Phase 5: Final Verification

Entry: All transformations applied.

Actions:

Run aptos move test --coverage
Verify test coverage is >= baseline (should be same or better)
Generate Modernization Summary Report:

## Modernization Summary

### Changes Applied
- Tier 1: X changes (syntax)
- Tier 2: X changes (visibility & errors)
- Tier 3: X changes (API migrations)

### Changes Skipped
- [List any skipped items with reasons]

### Test Results
- Tests: X passing (baseline: Y)
- Coverage: X% (baseline: Y%)

### Files Modified
- [List of modified files]

Exit: Report presented to user.

Modernization Scope Quick Reference

Scope	Tiers	Risk	When to Use
`syntax-only`	Tier 1	Zero	Just clean up syntax, no semantic changes
`standard`	Tier 1+2	Low	Default. Syntax + visibility + error constants
`full`	Tier 1+2+3	Medium-High	Full migration including API changes

Tier Quick Reference

Tier	What Changes	Risk	Examples
1 — Syntax	Code reads differently, compiles identically	Zero	`vector::borrow(&v, i)` → `v[i]`, `x = x + 1` → `x += 1`, `while (i < n) { ... i += 1 }` → `for (i in 0..n) { ... }`
2 — Visibility & Errors	Same semantics, cleaner declarations	Low	`public(friend)` → `package fun`, magic numbers → `E_*` constants
3 — API Migrations	Different APIs, same intended behavior. Most are breaking changes.	Medium-High	`coin` → `fungible_asset`, `SmartTable` → `BigOrderedMap`, `EventHandle` → `#[event]`, manual loops → stdlib `v.for_each_ref()`/`v.map()`/`v.fold()` with lambdas

See detection-rules.md for the complete rule catalog (22 rules across 3 tiers).

Rationalizations to Reject

Rationalization	Why It's Wrong
"Tests pass so the modernization is correct"	Tests verify behavior, not code quality. Review changes manually too.
"This contract is simple, skip the analysis"	Simple contracts can have subtle patterns. Always analyze first.
"Let's do all tiers at once to save time"	If tests break, you can't isolate which change caused it. Always tier.
"The receiver-style call looks right"	Must verify the target function declares `self`. False positives are common.
"Error constants can have new names and values"	Existing tests depend on exact numeric values. Preserve them.
"No tests exist, but the changes are safe"	Without tests there is no safety net. Generate tests first.
"Tier 3 changes are optional, skip the test run"	Every change needs verification. Tier 3 is highest risk — test MORE, not less.

Success Criteria

Analysis Report presented before any modifications
User confirmed modernization scope
Test baseline established before changes
Tests pass after each tier of changes
All error code numeric values preserved
No Tier 3 changes applied without full scope confirmation
Breaking changes excluded when user selected compatible mode
Modernization Summary Report generated
Test coverage maintained at or above baseline

Reference Index

File	Content
detection-rules.md	Complete V1 pattern detection catalog (22 rules across 3 tiers)
transformation-guide.md	Before/after code, safety checks, edge cases per rule
MOVE_V2_SYNTAX.md	Full V2 syntax reference
OBJECTS.md	Modern object model patterns
ADVANCED_TYPES.md	Enums, signed integers, phantom types

Related skills: generate-tests, write-contracts, security-audit