<gap_description>$ARGUMENTS</gap_description>

Backlog Tools Administrator

Close capability gaps in the backlog tooling ecosystem instead of bypassing the backlog tools (MCP or CLI) with direct file edits or gh commands.

Arguments

<gap_description/> — free-text description of the capability gap. Example: backlog.py update has no --title or --description flag.

When This Skill Activates

• Agent discovers backlog.py lacks a subcommand or flag for a needed operation
• Agent is about to use Write/Edit on a .claude/backlog/*.md file directly
• Agent is about to use gh issue edit instead of the backlog script
• User reports a process gap or workaround in the backlog workflow
• Post-mortem on a process violation involving backlog tooling

Domain

All files listed in ./references/domain-registry.md. Changes outside this registry are out of scope for this skill.

Workflow

flowchart TD
    Start(["Gap reported: <gap_description/>"]) --> S1["Step 1 — Identify the gap"]
    S1 --> S2{"Step 2 — Classify gap type"}
    S2 -->|"Script — backlog.py missing<br>subcommand, flag, or behavior"| Script["Step 3A — Script fix"]
    S2 -->|"Process — CLAUDE.md rule,<br>skill workflow, or state machine<br>is incomplete or ambiguous"| Process["Step 3B — Process fix"]
    S2 -->|"Documentation — skill SKILL.md,<br>agent prompt, or reference file<br>needs update"| Docs["Step 3C — Documentation fix"]
    S2 -->|"Multiple — gap spans<br>more than one category"| Multi["Step 3D — Multi-category fix"]
    Script --> S4["Step 4 — Validate fix"]
    Process --> S4
    Docs --> S4
    Multi --> S4
    S4 --> S5["Step 5 — Update domain registry"]

Step 1: Identify the Gap

Describe concretely:

1. What operation was needed — the action the agent or user tried to perform
2. What exists today — the closest available capability in the backlog tooling
3. What workaround was used (if any) — the bypass that violated process
4. Impact — what broke or could break due to the gap (sync drift, data loss, process violation)

Read the domain registry to confirm the gap is within scope.

Step 2: Classify the Gap

flowchart TD
    Q1{"Does the gap require<br>new or modified Python code<br>in the backlog tooling (MCP server or CLI)?"} -->|Yes| Script["SCRIPT gap"]
    Q1 -->|No| Q2{"Does the gap require<br>changing a rule, workflow step,<br>or state transition?"}
    Q2 -->|Yes| Process["PROCESS gap"]
    Q2 -->|No| Q3{"Does the gap require<br>updating skill instructions,<br>agent prompts, or references?"}
    Q3 -->|Yes| Docs["DOCUMENTATION gap"]
    Q3 -->|No| OOS["OUT OF SCOPE — report to user"]

Step 3A: Script Fix

For gaps requiring changes to the backlog tooling (MCP server or CLI).

Extension architecture: Both server.py and backlog.py are thin wrappers over operations.py. New capabilities must be added in dependency order:

1. Primary: Extend operations.py with the new function — this is the single source of business logic.
2. Secondary (MCP): Add @mcp.tool() wrapper in server.py to expose the new operation as an MCP tool.
3. Secondary (CLI): Add a subcommand in backlog.py to expose the new operation via the CLI.

Delegation:

1. Task is implementing the script fix with subagent_type="python3-development:python-cli-architect" Context to include in the prompt: .claude/skills/backlog/backlog_core/operations.py (primary business logic), .claude/skills/backlog/backlog_core/server.py (MCP tool definitions), .claude/skills/backlog/scripts/backlog.py (CLI wrapper), .claude/skills/backlog/tests/test_backlog_gh_first.py (existing tests), the gap description from Step 1, and .claude/skills/backlog/references/item-schema.md (frontmatter schema) Output: modified operations.py with new function, server.py with @mcp.tool() wrapper, backlog.py with CLI subcommand, passing tests, linting clean

2. After the agent completes, verify the fix:

   uv run prek run --files .claude/skills/backlog/backlog_core/operations.py .claude/skills/backlog/backlog_core/server.py .claude/skills/backlog/scripts/backlog.py
   uv run pytest .claude/skills/backlog/tests/
   

3. Update the backlog skill SKILL.md to document the new MCP tool and CLI subcommand — proceed to Step 3C.

Step 3B: Process Fix

For gaps requiring changes to rules, workflow steps, or state transitions.

1. Load the improve-processes skill for process quality methodology:

   Skill(skill: "improve-processes")
   

2. Read the affected process file(s) from the domain registry.

3. Apply the improve-processes triage protocol and excellence checklist to the modified process.

4. Write the corrected process using Edit on the affected file (CLAUDE.md section, skill SKILL.md, or reference file).

5. If the process change affects a skill's workflow, delegate the skill edit to Step 3C.

Step 3C: Documentation Fix

For gaps requiring changes to skill instructions, agent prompts, or reference files.

1. Task is optimizing the affected documentation with subagent_type="plugin-creator:contextual-ai-documentation-optimizer" Context to include in the prompt: the file to modify (skill SKILL.md, agent .md, or reference .md), the gap description from Step 1, and plugins/plugin-creator/skills/claude-skills-overview-2026/SKILL.md and plugins/plugin-creator/skills/hooks-guide/SKILL.md as structural references when modifying skills or hooks Output: updated file with the gap addressed, CoVe verification passing

Step 3D: Multi-Category Fix

When the gap spans multiple categories, execute steps in dependency order:

1. Script first (Step 3A) — new capabilities must exist before processes can reference them
2. Process second (Step 3B) — rules must be updated before documentation describes them
3. Documentation last (Step 3C) — skill/agent docs reflect the final state

Step 4: Validate the Fix

Verify the gap is closed:

1. Script changes:

   uv run prek run --files <modified-files>
   uv run pytest .claude/skills/backlog/tests/
   

   For MCP tool additions: call the new mcp__plugin_dh_backlog__<tool_name> tool with valid parameters and confirm the returned dict contains expected result keys (not an error key).

2. Process changes: confirm the new rule/workflow handles the original gap scenario without ambiguity.

3. Documentation changes: confirm the updated instructions would have prevented the original workaround.

Report what changed:

GAP: {original gap description}
TYPE: {SCRIPT|PROCESS|DOCUMENTATION|MULTI}
FILES CHANGED:
  - {file path}: {what changed}
VALIDATION: {PASS|FAIL — with details}

Step 5: Update Domain Registry

If new files were created (new reference, new test, new script), update ./references/domain-registry.md to include them.

Completion Criteria

• Gap identified with concrete description (operation, existing capability, workaround, impact)
• Gap classified as SCRIPT, PROCESS, DOCUMENTATION, or MULTI
• Fix delegated to appropriate agent (not implemented inline)
• Script changes pass tests and linting
• Process changes satisfy improve-processes excellence checklist
• Documentation changes pass CoVe verification
• Domain registry updated if new files were created
• Report delivered showing what changed and validation status