xctest-patterns
SKILL.md
XCTest Patterns — Expert Decisions
Expert decision frameworks for testing choices. Claude knows XCTest syntax — this skill provides judgment calls for test strategy and mock design.
Decision Trees
Test Type Selection
What are you testing?
├─ Pure business logic (no I/O, no UI)
│ └─ Unit test
│ Fast, isolated, many of these
│
├─ Component interactions (services, repositories)
│ └─ Integration test
│ Test real interactions, fewer than unit
│
├─ User-visible behavior
│ └─ Does it require visual verification?
│ ├─ YES → Snapshot test or manual QA
│ └─ NO → UI test (XCUITest)
│ Slowest, fewest of these
│
└─ Performance characteristics
└─ Performance test with measure {}
Mock vs Stub vs Spy
What do you need from the test double?
├─ Just return canned data
│ └─ Stub
│ Simplest, no verification
│
├─ Verify interactions (was method called?)
│ └─ Spy
│ Records calls, verifiable
│
└─ Both return data AND verify calls
└─ Mock (stub + spy)
Most flexible, most complex
When to Mock
Is this dependency...
├─ External (network, database, filesystem)?
│ └─ Always mock
│ Tests must be fast and deterministic
│
├─ Internal but slow or stateful?
│ └─ Mock if it makes test significantly faster
│
└─ Internal and fast?
└─ Consider using real implementation
Integration coverage > isolation purity
Async Test Strategy
Is the async operation...
├─ Returning a value (async/await)?
│ └─ Use async test function
│ func testFetch() async throws { }
│
├─ Using completion handlers?
│ └─ Use XCTestExpectation
│ expectation.fulfill() in callback
│
└─ Publishing via Combine?
└─ Use XCTestExpectation + sink
Or use async-aware Combine helpers
NEVER Do
Test Design
NEVER test implementation details:
// ❌ Testing internal state
func testLogin() async {
await sut.login(email: "test@example.com", password: "pass")
XCTAssertEqual(sut.authService.callCount, 1) // Implementation detail!
XCTAssertEqual(sut.lastRequestTimestamp, Date()) // Internal state!
}
// ✅ Test observable behavior
func testLoginSuccess_SetsAuthenticatedState() async {
await sut.login(email: "test@example.com", password: "pass")
XCTAssertTrue(sut.isAuthenticated) // Observable state
}
NEVER write tests that depend on execution order:
// ❌ Tests depend on each other
func testA_AddItem() {
sut.add(item) // sut state modified
XCTAssertEqual(sut.count, 1)
}
func testB_RemoveItem() {
// Depends on testA running first!
sut.remove(item)
XCTAssertEqual(sut.count, 0)
}
// ✅ Each test sets up its own state
func testRemoveItem() {
sut.add(item) // Explicit setup
sut.remove(item)
XCTAssertEqual(sut.count, 0)
}
NEVER use sleep() in tests:
// ❌ Flaky and slow
func testAsyncOperation() {
sut.startOperation()
Thread.sleep(forTimeInterval: 2.0) // Arbitrary wait!
XCTAssertTrue(sut.isComplete)
}
// ✅ Use expectations or async/await
func testAsyncOperation() async {
await sut.startOperation()
XCTAssertTrue(sut.isComplete)
}
// Or with expectations
func testAsyncOperation() {
let expectation = expectation(description: "Operation completes")
sut.startOperation { expectation.fulfill() }
wait(for: [expectation], timeout: 5.0)
}
Mock Design
NEVER create mocks that have real side effects:
// ❌ Mock does real work
final class MockNetworkService: NetworkServiceProtocol {
func fetch(_ url: URL) async throws -> Data {
try await URLSession.shared.data(from: url).0 // Real network!
}
}
// ✅ Mock returns stubbed data
final class MockNetworkService: NetworkServiceProtocol {
var stubbedData: Data = Data()
var stubbedError: Error?
func fetch(_ url: URL) async throws -> Data {
if let error = stubbedError { throw error }
return stubbedData
}
}
NEVER verify everything in mocks:
// ❌ Over-specified — breaks if implementation changes
func testLogin() async {
await sut.login()
XCTAssertEqual(mockService.loginCallCount, 1)
XCTAssertEqual(mockService.setTokenCallCount, 1)
XCTAssertEqual(mockService.logAnalyticsCallCount, 1)
XCTAssertEqual(mockService.updateUserCallCount, 1)
// 10 more assertions...
}
// ✅ Verify only what matters for this test
func testLogin_StoresToken() async {
await sut.login()
XCTAssertNotNil(mockTokenStore.storedToken)
}
Async Testing
NEVER forget to await async operations:
// ❌ Test passes before async work completes
func testFetchUser() {
Task {
await sut.fetchUser() // Runs after test ends!
}
XCTAssertNotNil(sut.user) // Always fails
}
// ✅ Make test function async
func testFetchUser() async {
await sut.fetchUser()
XCTAssertNotNil(sut.user)
}
NEVER forget to fulfill expectations:
// ❌ Test hangs if error path doesn't fulfill
func testNetworkCall() {
let expectation = expectation(description: "Call completes")
sut.fetch { result in
if case .success = result {
expectation.fulfill()
}
// Error case doesn't fulfill — test hangs!
}
wait(for: [expectation], timeout: 5.0)
}
// ✅ Fulfill in all paths
func testNetworkCall() {
let expectation = expectation(description: "Call completes")
sut.fetch { result in
// Always fulfill, assert after
expectation.fulfill()
}
wait(for: [expectation], timeout: 5.0)
// Assert on result here
}
UI Testing
NEVER use fixed delays in UI tests:
// ❌ Flaky — element might appear faster or slower
func testLoginFlow() {
app.buttons["login"].tap()
Thread.sleep(forTimeInterval: 3.0)
XCTAssertTrue(app.staticTexts["Welcome"].exists)
}
// ✅ Use waitForExistence
func testLoginFlow() {
app.buttons["login"].tap()
let welcome = app.staticTexts["Welcome"]
XCTAssertTrue(welcome.waitForExistence(timeout: 5.0))
}
NEVER rely on element positions:
// ❌ Breaks if UI layout changes
let firstButton = app.buttons.element(boundBy: 0)
// ✅ Use accessibility identifiers
let loginButton = app.buttons["loginButton"]
Essential Patterns
Structured Mock with Spy
final class MockUserService: UserServiceProtocol {
// Stubs
var stubbedUser: User?
var stubbedError: Error?
// Spy tracking
private(set) var fetchUserCallCount = 0
private(set) var fetchUserLastId: String?
func fetchUser(id: String) async throws -> User {
fetchUserCallCount += 1
fetchUserLastId = id
if let error = stubbedError { throw error }
guard let user = stubbedUser else {
throw MockError.notConfigured
}
return user
}
// Verification helpers
func verify(fetchUserCalledWith id: String) -> Bool {
fetchUserLastId == id
}
}
ViewModel Test Pattern
@MainActor
final class UserViewModelTests: XCTestCase {
var sut: UserViewModel!
var mockService: MockUserService!
override func setUp() {
super.setUp()
mockService = MockUserService()
sut = UserViewModel(userService: mockService)
}
override func tearDown() {
sut = nil
mockService = nil
super.tearDown()
}
// Test initial state
func testInitialState() {
XCTAssertNil(sut.user)
XCTAssertFalse(sut.isLoading)
XCTAssertNil(sut.errorMessage)
}
// Test success path
func testFetchUser_Success() async {
mockService.stubbedUser = User(id: "1", name: "John")
await sut.fetchUser(id: "1")
XCTAssertEqual(sut.user?.name, "John")
XCTAssertFalse(sut.isLoading)
XCTAssertNil(sut.errorMessage)
}
// Test error path
func testFetchUser_Error() async {
mockService.stubbedError = NetworkError.timeout
await sut.fetchUser(id: "1")
XCTAssertNil(sut.user)
XCTAssertFalse(sut.isLoading)
XCTAssertNotNil(sut.errorMessage)
}
}
Test Data Builder
final class UserBuilder {
private var id = "test-id"
private var name = "Test User"
private var email = "test@example.com"
private var isActive = true
func withId(_ id: String) -> Self {
self.id = id
return self
}
func withName(_ name: String) -> Self {
self.name = name
return self
}
func inactive() -> Self {
self.isActive = false
return self
}
func build() -> User {
User(id: id, name: name, email: email, isActive: isActive)
}
}
// Usage
let activeUser = UserBuilder().build()
let inactiveUser = UserBuilder().inactive().build()
let specificUser = UserBuilder().withId("123").withName("John").build()
Async Expectation Helper
extension XCTestCase {
func awaitPublisher<T: Publisher>(
_ publisher: T,
timeout: TimeInterval = 1.0,
file: StaticString = #file,
line: UInt = #line
) throws -> T.Output where T.Failure == Never {
var result: T.Output?
let expectation = expectation(description: "Awaiting publisher")
let cancellable = publisher.sink { value in
result = value
expectation.fulfill()
}
wait(for: [expectation], timeout: timeout)
cancellable.cancel()
return try XCTUnwrap(result, file: file, line: line)
}
}
Quick Reference
Test Pyramid Distribution
| Test Type | Quantity | Speed | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unit | Many (70%) | Fast | High |
| Integration | Some (20%) | Medium | Medium |
| UI | Few (10%) | Slow | Lower |
Coverage Thresholds by Layer
| Layer | Target | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Domain/Business Logic | 90%+ | Critical correctness |
| Services/Repositories | 85% | Error handling matters |
| ViewModels | 70-80% | State transitions |
| Views | Don't measure | Visual QA instead |
Assertion Cheat Sheet
| Check | Assertion |
|---|---|
| Equality | XCTAssertEqual(a, b) |
| Nil | XCTAssertNil(x) / XCTAssertNotNil(x) |
| Boolean | XCTAssertTrue(x) / XCTAssertFalse(x) |
| Throws | XCTAssertThrowsError(try expr) |
| No throw | XCTAssertNoThrow(try expr) |
| Fail | XCTFail("message") |
Red Flags
| Smell | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Tests run > 10s | Too slow | More mocking, fewer UI tests |
| Tests fail randomly | Flaky | Remove timing dependencies |
| setUp() is huge | Tests coupled | Extract builders/helpers |
| Mock verifies everything | Over-specified | Only verify what matters |
| Tests share state | Order-dependent | Fresh sut in setUp() |
| sleep() in tests | Unreliable | Expectations or async |
| 100% coverage goal | Chasing metrics | Focus on behavior coverage |
Weekly Installs
19
Repository
kaakati/rails-e…rise-devGitHub Stars
6
First Seen
Jan 25, 2026
Security Audits
Installed on
opencode17
codex16
gemini-cli15
github-copilot15
cursor13
claude-code13