prd-to-plan
PRD to Plan
Break a PRD into a phased implementation plan using vertical slices (tracer bullets). Output is a Markdown file in ./plans/.
Process
1. Confirm the PRD is in context
The PRD should already be in the conversation. If it isn't, ask the user to paste it or point you to the file.
2. Explore the codebase
If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current architecture, existing patterns, and integration layers. Reference .codemap/MAP.md (if present) for module boundaries when defining tracer-bullet slices — vertical slices should respect the existing module structure where possible.
3. Identify durable architectural decisions
Before slicing, identify high-level decisions that are unlikely to change throughout implementation:
- Route structures / URL patterns
- Database schema shape
- Key data models
- Authentication / authorization approach
- Third-party service boundaries
These go in the plan header so every phase can reference them.
4. Draft vertical slices
Break the PRD into tracer bullet phases. Each phase is a thin vertical slice that cuts through ALL integration layers end-to-end, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer.
Rules:
- Each slice delivers a narrow but COMPLETE path through every layer (schema, API, UI, tests)
- A completed slice is demoable or verifiable on its own
- Prefer many thin slices over few thick ones
- Do NOT include specific file names, function names, or implementation details that are likely to change as later phases are built
- DO include durable decisions: route paths, schema shapes, data model names
5. Quiz the user
Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each phase show:
- Title: short descriptive name
- User stories covered: which user stories from the PRD this addresses
Ask the user:
- Does the granularity feel right? (too coarse / too fine)
- Should any phases be merged or split further?
Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.
6. Write the plan file
Create ./plans/ if it doesn't exist. Write the plan as a Markdown file named after the feature (e.g. ./plans/user-onboarding.md). Use the template below.
# Plan: <Feature Name>
> Source PRD: <brief identifier>
## Architectural decisions
Durable decisions that apply across all phases:
- **Routes**: ...
- **Schema**: ...
- **Key models**: ...
- (add/remove sections as appropriate)
---
## Phase 1: <Title>
**User stories**: <list from PRD>
### What to build
A concise description of this vertical slice. Describe the end-to-end behavior, not layer-by-layer implementation.
### Acceptance criteria
- [ ] Criterion 1
- [ ] Criterion 2
- [ ] Criterion 3
---
## Phase 2: <Title>
**User stories**: <list from PRD>
### What to build
...
### Acceptance criteria
- [ ] ...
<!-- Repeat for each phase -->
More from kenlck/skills
bug-fix
Structured bug fixing with reproduction, root cause analysis, fix design, regression risk analysis, and quality review. Only invoke this skill when the user explicitly asks to use it by name (e.g. "use bug-fix", "run bug-fix") or clearly requests a structured/systematic bug fixing process. Do not invoke for general bug reports, error messages, or broken behavior — handle those directly without this skill.
18simplify
Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Focuses on recently modified code unless instructed otherwise.
17feature-dev
Optimized guided feature development with deep requirement drilling, codebase understanding, and design-quality frontend implementation. Use this skill whenever the user wants to build or implement a feature — whether they say "let's build X", "add feature Y", "implement Z", "I want to create", "can we add", or any variation. This is the go-to skill for any non-trivial software feature work. Prefer this over a plain coding response whenever the feature has more than one moving part.
17code-review
Review changed code for bugs, simplicity, security, and convention adherence using parallel reviewer agents. Use when the user asks to review code, review a PR, check quality, or wants a second pair of eyes before merging.
17grill-me
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".
16review-skill
Review an existing skill against the write-a-skill guidelines, checking structure, description quality, file size, and review checklist. Use when user wants to audit, improve, or validate a skill they've written or installed.
14