acceptance-criteria-design
Acceptance Criteria Design
Overview
Use this skill to translate approved requirements into acceptance criteria that engineering and QA can execute without interpretation drift.
Scope Boundaries
- Use this skill when the task matches the trigger condition described in
description. - Do not use this skill when the primary task falls outside this skill's domain.
Inputs To Gather
- Approved requirements (
REQ-*) and relevant non-functional requirements (NFR-*). - Business intent, out-of-scope boundaries, and policy constraints.
- User-visible behaviors, system side effects, and error paths.
- Test environment capabilities and observability limits.
Deliverables
- Acceptance criteria set with binary pass/fail expectations.
- Scenario matrix covering happy path, boundary, negative, and failure cases.
- Traceability map: requirement -> criterion -> verification method.
- Open ambiguity list that blocks objective verification.
Quality Standard
- Each criterion is independently testable and yields one clear result.
- Each criterion states preconditions, action, expected observable outcome, and evidence source.
- Boundary values, invalid inputs, authorization errors, and integration failure behavior are covered when applicable.
- Criteria describe required behavior, not implementation detail.
- Overlap and contradiction across criteria are removed.
Workflow
- Normalize requirement intent and explicit assumptions.
- Split requirements into observable behavior units.
- Draft pass/fail criteria for normal, boundary, negative, and failure scenarios.
- Define evidence sources (API response, UI state, logs, metrics, events) for each criterion.
- Run ambiguity and overlap review; publish unresolved blockers.
Failure Conditions
- Stop when requirement intent is unstable or contradictory.
- Stop when a criterion cannot be verified with available test/observability capabilities.
- Escalate when missing instrumentation prevents objective pass/fail judgment.
More from kentoshimizu/sw-agent-skills
graph-algorithms
Graph algorithm workflow for modeling entities/relations and selecting traversal, path, ordering, or flow strategies. Use when correctness or performance depends on graph representation and algorithm choice; do not use for schema-only modeling or deployment topology planning.
14bash-style-guide
Style, review, and refactoring standards for Bash shell scripting. Trigger when `.sh` files, files with `#!/usr/bin/env bash` or `#!/bin/bash`, or CI workflow blocks with `shell: bash` are created, modified, or reviewed and Bash-specific quality controls (quoting safety, error handling, portability, readability) must be enforced. Do not use for generic POSIX `sh`, PowerShell, or language-specific application style rules. In multi-language pull requests, run together with other applicable `*-style-guide` skills.
11architecture-clean-architecture
Clean Architecture workflow for enforcing dependency direction, stable domain boundaries, and use-case-centered application design. Use when teams must separate business rules from frameworks and delivery mechanisms; do not use for isolated module cleanup without boundary implications.
11powershell-style-guide
Style, review, and refactoring standards for PowerShell scripting. Trigger when `.ps1`, `.psm1`, `.psd1` files, or CI workflow blocks with `shell: pwsh` or `shell: powershell` are created, modified, or reviewed and PowerShell-specific quality controls (error handling, parameter validation, readability, operational safety) must be enforced. Do not use for Bash, generic POSIX `sh`, or language-specific application style rules. In multi-language pull requests, run together with other applicable `*-style-guide` skills.
10github-codeowners-management
Govern CODEOWNERS rules so review routing reflects real ownership and risk boundaries on GitHub. Use when repository ownership mapping or mandatory reviewer rules must be defined, updated, or audited; do not use for non-GitHub runtime architecture or data-layer design.
9security-authentication
Security workflow for authentication architecture, credential lifecycle, and session/token assurance. Use when login, identity proofing, MFA, or session security decisions are required; do not use for authorization policy design or non-security quality tuning.
9