code-review-security
Code Review Security
Overview
Use this skill to identify exploitable weaknesses and data-protection risks before merge.
Scope Boundaries
- Use this skill when the task matches the trigger condition described in
description. - Do not use this skill when the primary task falls outside this skill's domain.
Inputs To Gather
- Changed trust boundaries (external input, authn/authz, storage, outbound calls).
- Sensitive data categories and handling paths.
- Existing security controls (validation, encoding, policy checks, audit logs).
- Threat model assumptions relevant to the changed area.
Deliverables
- Security findings with exploit path and severity.
- Risk acceptance/escalation items for unresolved issues.
- Required remediation and verification actions.
Finding Focus Areas
- Input validation and injection paths.
- Authn/authz bypass and privilege escalation.
- Secret leakage in code, logs, or telemetry.
- Sensitive data exposure at rest/in transit/in logs.
- Unsafe defaults, fallback auth, or policy bypass paths.
Quick Example
- Diff adds debug log containing full JWT token.
- Finding: high-severity secret exposure risk.
- Fix direction: redact token, log token hash/metadata only.
Quality Standard
- Findings describe concrete exploit scenario, not vague concern.
- Severity reflects impact + exploitability.
- Fix guidance removes root cause and prevents recurrence.
- Residual risk is explicit when immediate full fix is infeasible.
Workflow
- Map changed code to trust boundaries and assets.
- Evaluate exploit paths across input, auth, and data handling.
- Verify security controls are present and correctly ordered.
- Identify regressions introduced by fallback or bypass logic.
- Publish prioritized findings and remediation requirements.
Failure Conditions
- Stop when high-severity vulnerabilities remain unresolved.
- Escalate when risk acceptance exceeds policy or lacks approver.
More from kentoshimizu/sw-agent-skills
graph-algorithms
Graph algorithm workflow for modeling entities/relations and selecting traversal, path, ordering, or flow strategies. Use when correctness or performance depends on graph representation and algorithm choice; do not use for schema-only modeling or deployment topology planning.
14bash-style-guide
Style, review, and refactoring standards for Bash shell scripting. Trigger when `.sh` files, files with `#!/usr/bin/env bash` or `#!/bin/bash`, or CI workflow blocks with `shell: bash` are created, modified, or reviewed and Bash-specific quality controls (quoting safety, error handling, portability, readability) must be enforced. Do not use for generic POSIX `sh`, PowerShell, or language-specific application style rules. In multi-language pull requests, run together with other applicable `*-style-guide` skills.
11architecture-clean-architecture
Clean Architecture workflow for enforcing dependency direction, stable domain boundaries, and use-case-centered application design. Use when teams must separate business rules from frameworks and delivery mechanisms; do not use for isolated module cleanup without boundary implications.
11powershell-style-guide
Style, review, and refactoring standards for PowerShell scripting. Trigger when `.ps1`, `.psm1`, `.psd1` files, or CI workflow blocks with `shell: pwsh` or `shell: powershell` are created, modified, or reviewed and PowerShell-specific quality controls (error handling, parameter validation, readability, operational safety) must be enforced. Do not use for Bash, generic POSIX `sh`, or language-specific application style rules. In multi-language pull requests, run together with other applicable `*-style-guide` skills.
10github-codeowners-management
Govern CODEOWNERS rules so review routing reflects real ownership and risk boundaries on GitHub. Use when repository ownership mapping or mandatory reviewer rules must be defined, updated, or audited; do not use for non-GitHub runtime architecture or data-layer design.
9security-authentication
Security workflow for authentication architecture, credential lifecycle, and session/token assurance. Use when login, identity proofing, MFA, or session security decisions are required; do not use for authorization policy design or non-security quality tuning.
9