technical-roadmapping
Technical Roadmapping
Overview
Use this skill to produce realistic technical roadmaps that make sequencing, risk, and ownership explicit.
Scope Boundaries
- Multiple initiatives compete for the same engineering capacity.
- Dependency ordering and milestone timing determine delivery feasibility.
- Teams need a defensible plan across quarters or release trains.
Templates And Assets
- Milestone template:
assets/roadmap-milestone-template.md
- Dependency and risk register:
assets/dependency-risk-register-template.md
Inputs To Gather
- Initiative goals, outcome metrics, and non-negotiable deadlines.
- Dependency graph (technical, organizational, vendor, compliance).
- Capacity assumptions, staffing constraints, and environment readiness.
- Risk tolerance and escalation policy.
Deliverables
- Sequenced roadmap with milestones, owners, and decision checkpoints.
- Dependency map and critical-path analysis.
- Risk register with mitigation actions and trigger-based contingency plans.
Workflow
- Define desired outcomes and constraints for each initiative.
- Map dependencies and identify the critical path.
- Evaluate at least two sequencing options with trade-offs (risk, value timing, coordination cost).
- Select a roadmap option and document rationale and rejected alternatives.
- Assign milestone entry/exit criteria and measurable progress signals.
- Add contingency actions for high-impact dependency or staffing failures.
- Publish roadmap with review cadence and explicit replan triggers.
Quality Standard
- Sequence is justified by dependencies, not only stakeholder preference.
- Milestones have objective entry/exit criteria.
- Risks are tied to owners, deadlines, and mitigation plans.
- The roadmap can be revised predictably when assumptions change.
Failure Conditions
- Stop when critical dependencies are unknown or unowned.
- Stop when milestones lack measurable completion criteria.
- Escalate when required outcomes exceed feasible capacity under current constraints.
More from kentoshimizu/sw-agent-skills
graph-algorithms
Graph algorithm workflow for modeling entities/relations and selecting traversal, path, ordering, or flow strategies. Use when correctness or performance depends on graph representation and algorithm choice; do not use for schema-only modeling or deployment topology planning.
14bash-style-guide
Style, review, and refactoring standards for Bash shell scripting. Trigger when `.sh` files, files with `#!/usr/bin/env bash` or `#!/bin/bash`, or CI workflow blocks with `shell: bash` are created, modified, or reviewed and Bash-specific quality controls (quoting safety, error handling, portability, readability) must be enforced. Do not use for generic POSIX `sh`, PowerShell, or language-specific application style rules. In multi-language pull requests, run together with other applicable `*-style-guide` skills.
11architecture-clean-architecture
Clean Architecture workflow for enforcing dependency direction, stable domain boundaries, and use-case-centered application design. Use when teams must separate business rules from frameworks and delivery mechanisms; do not use for isolated module cleanup without boundary implications.
11powershell-style-guide
Style, review, and refactoring standards for PowerShell scripting. Trigger when `.ps1`, `.psm1`, `.psd1` files, or CI workflow blocks with `shell: pwsh` or `shell: powershell` are created, modified, or reviewed and PowerShell-specific quality controls (error handling, parameter validation, readability, operational safety) must be enforced. Do not use for Bash, generic POSIX `sh`, or language-specific application style rules. In multi-language pull requests, run together with other applicable `*-style-guide` skills.
10github-codeowners-management
Govern CODEOWNERS rules so review routing reflects real ownership and risk boundaries on GitHub. Use when repository ownership mapping or mandatory reviewer rules must be defined, updated, or audited; do not use for non-GitHub runtime architecture or data-layer design.
9security-authentication
Security workflow for authentication architecture, credential lifecycle, and session/token assurance. Use when login, identity proofing, MFA, or session security decisions are required; do not use for authorization policy design or non-security quality tuning.
9