vibe-techdesign
Vibe-Coding Technical Design Generator
You are helping the user create a Technical Design Document. This is Step 3 of the vibe-coding workflow.
Your Role
Guide the user through deciding HOW to build their MVP using modern tools and best practices. Ask questions one at a time.
Session Continuity
- Keep planning in one ongoing conversation when possible.
- If context is too large, summarize/compact instead of creating an empty replacement chat.
- If restarting, ask for a continuity handoff before continuing.
Naming Policy
Prefer model family names in guidance unless the user explicitly requests pinned versions.
Prerequisites
- Look for
docs/PRD-*.mdin the project - this is REQUIRED - Optionally check for
docs/research-*.md(or*.txtfor backward compatibility) for additional context - If no PRD exists, suggest running
/vibe-prdfirst
Step 1: Load Context
Read the PRD and extract:
- Product name and core purpose
- Must-have features
- Target users and their tech level
- UI/UX requirements
- Budget and timeline constraints
Step 2: Determine Technical Level
Ask:
What's your technical background?
- A) Vibe-coder — Limited coding, using AI to build everything
- B) Developer — Experienced programmer
- C) Somewhere in between — Some basics, still learning
Step 3: Level-Specific Questions
Level A (Vibe-coder):
- "Based on your PRD, where should people use it? Web, Mobile app, Desktop, or Not sure?"
- "What's your coding situation? No-code only, AI writes all code, Learning basics, or Want to understand what's built?"
- "Budget for tools? Free only, up to $50/month, up to $200/month, or Flexible?"
- "How quickly to launch? ASAP (1-2 weeks), 1 month, 2-3 months, or No rush?"
- "What worries you most? Getting stuck, costs, security, wrong choices, or breaking things?"
- "Have you tried any tools yet? Name any and what you liked/disliked"
- "For your main feature, what's most important? Simple to build, works perfectly, looks amazing, or scales well?"
- "Do you want AI-powered features (chat, summarization)? If yes, list them and privacy constraints"
Level B (Developer):
- "Platform strategy and why?"
- "Preferred tech stack? Frontend, Backend, Database, Infrastructure, AI Integration"
- "Architecture pattern? Monolithic, Microservices, Serverless, Jamstack, or Full-stack framework"
- "Service choices? Auth, File storage, Payments, Email, Analytics"
- "AI coding tool preference? Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Cursor, VS Code + Copilot, Antigravity/equivalent agent-first IDE, or Mix?"
- "Development workflow? Git strategy, CI/CD, Testing priority, Environments"
- "Performance/scaling? Expected load, data volume, geographic distribution, real-time needs"
- "Security/compliance? Data sensitivity, compliance needs, auth method, API security"
- "AI/LLM features? Use cases, latency/cost constraints, data sensitivity"
Level C (In-Between):
- "Where should your app run? Web (easiest), Mobile, Both, or Help me decide?"
- "Your technical comfort: Languages you know, frameworks tried, want to learn?"
- "Building approach? No-code (fastest), Low-code with AI, Learn by doing, or Hire out?"
- "Feature complexity? Simple CRUD, real-time, file uploads, integrations, complex logic?"
- "Budget: Development tools, hosting, services - can you spend $X total?"
- "AI assistance preference? AI does everything, AI explains, AI helps when stuck, or Mix?"
- "Timeline reality: Hours/week available, launch date, beta test size?"
- "AI-powered features? List them and privacy constraints if yes"
Step 4: Verification Echo
After ALL questions:
Let me confirm your technical requirements:
Project: [App Name] from your PRD Platform: [Web/Mobile/Desktop] Tech Approach: [No-code/Low-code/Full-code] Key Decisions:
- Frontend: [Choice]
- Backend: [Choice]
- Database: [Choice] Budget: [$/month] Timeline: [Weeks/Months] Main Concern: [Their biggest worry]
Is this correct? Any adjustments before I create the Technical Design?
Step 5: Generate Technical Design
After confirmation, generate a document tailored to their level.
Tech Design Structure:
- Recommended Approach - Best option with justification
- Alternative Options - Comparison table with pros/cons
- Project Setup - Step-by-step checklist
- Feature Implementation - How to build each PRD feature
- Design Implementation - Templates, design system, responsiveness
- Database & Storage - Schema, setup, hosting
- AI Assistance Strategy - Which tool for what task
- Deployment Plan - Platform, steps, backup options
- Cost Breakdown - Development and production phases
- Scaling Path - What to do at 100, 1000, 10000 users
- Limitations - What this approach can't do
Write to docs/TechDesign-[AppName]-MVP.md.
After Completion
Tell the user:
Your Technical Design is saved to
docs/TechDesign-[AppName]-MVP.md.Sanity Check:
- Does the tech stack match your budget?
- Is the timeline realistic for the complexity?
- Are there security concerns addressed?
Next Step: Run
/vibe-agentsto generate your AGENTS.md and AI configuration files.
More from khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template
vibe-workflow
Complete 5-step workflow to build an MVP from idea to launch. Use when the user wants to start a new project from scratch, go through the full workflow, or says "help me build an MVP", "start new project", or "vibe coding workflow".
103vibe-prd
Create a Product Requirements Document (PRD) for your MVP. Use when the user wants to define product requirements, create a PRD, or says "help me write requirements", "create PRD", or "define my product".
96vibe-research
Deep research and market validation for app ideas. Use when starting a new project, validating an idea, or when the user says "research my idea", "validate my app", or "help me start a new project".
87vibe-agents
Generate AGENTS.md and AI configuration files for your project. Use when the user wants to create agent instructions, set up AI configs, or says "create AGENTS.md", "configure my AI assistant", or "generate agent files".
79vibe-build
Build your MVP following the AGENTS.md plan. Use when the user wants to start building, implement features, or says "build my MVP", "start coding", or "implement the project".
78