product-frameworks-for-design-and-management
Product Frameworks
Overview
Comprehensive product design and management frameworks to guide strategic decisions, improve user experience, and structure product workflows.
Reference Files:
- references/design-principles.md — Hick's Law, Fitts's Law, affordances, feedback
- references/design-processes.md — Double Diamond, Agile, Lean UX, User-Centered Design
- references/prioritization-frameworks.md — RICE, MoSCoW, Kano Model, Pareto Principle
- references/lifecycle-guidance.md — Product stage strategies
- references/requirements.md — PRD templates, user stories, acceptance criteria
- references/critique-guidelines.md — Design review facilitation
- references/usability-testing.md — Test planning and analysis
Quick Start
- Identify the domain — Determine which area of product/design work you're addressing
- Load the relevant reference — Read the specific reference file for that domain
- Apply the frameworks — Use the guidance to inform decisions or structure workflows
When to Use
| Need | Reference File |
|---|---|
| UI/UX decisions | design-principles.md |
| Planning discovery work | design-processes.md |
| Evaluating features | prioritization-frameworks.md |
| Product stage strategy | lifecycle-guidance.md |
| Creating PRDs or user stories | requirements.md |
| Running design reviews | critique-guidelines.md |
| Planning user research | usability-testing.md |
Example Workflows
Feature Evaluation:
- Load
prioritization-frameworks.mdfor RICE and Kano Model - Load
lifecycle-guidance.mdfor stage-specific priorities - Apply both for informed prioritization
Interface Design Feedback:
- Load
design-principles.mdfor Hick's Law and Fitts's Law - Evaluate design against heuristics
- Load
critique-guidelines.mdto structure feedback
Discovery Phase Planning:
- Load
design-processes.mdfor Double Diamond - Load
usability-testing.mdfor research planning - Structure discovery using both
Framework Summaries
Design Principles: Hick's Law (choice overload), Fitts's Law (target sizing), affordances, feedback loops, system status visibility
Design Processes: Double Diamond (Discover→Define→Develop→Deliver), Agile, Lean UX, User-Centered Design
Prioritization: RICE Scoring, MoSCoW (Must/Should/Could/Won't), Kano Model, 80/20 Rule
Lifecycle: Introduction, Growth, Maturity, Decline stage strategies
Documentation: PRD structure, user story format, acceptance criteria
Best Practices
Progressive Loading: Don't load all references at once. Start with the most relevant file, then add others as needed.
Context-Specific Application: Frameworks are guidance, not rigid rules. Apply with judgment based on your product context.
Complementary Frameworks:
- Kano Model + RICE = comprehensive prioritization
- Double Diamond + Lean UX = structured but iterative discovery
- User-Centered Design + Usability Testing = validated user focus
Shared Language: Use framework terminology to align teams and communicate with stakeholders.
More from kjgarza/marketplace-claude
detect-code-smells
Detect common code smells and anti-patterns providing feedback on quality issues a senior developer would catch during review. Use when user opens/views code files, asks for code review or quality assessment, mentions code quality/refactoring/improvements, when files contain code smell patterns, or during code review discussions.
10scientific-visualization
Create publication figures with matplotlib/seaborn/plotly. Multi-panel layouts, error bars, significance markers, colorblind-safe, export PDF/EPS/TIFF, for journal-ready scientific plots.
9searching-academic-outputs-with-dimensions
Search for academic literature, empirical evidence, and scholarly research using the Dimensions database. Use when seeking research papers to support product decisions, find empirical studies, conduct literature reviews, explore funding patterns, validate hypotheses with academic sources, or discover research trends. Supports publications, grants, patents, clinical trials, and researcher profiles. Triggers on requests for "academic evidence", "empirical research", "find studies", "literature search", or "research to support decisions".
8scholar-evaluation
Systematic framework for evaluating scholarly and research work based on the ScholarEval methodology. This skill should be used when assessing research papers, evaluating literature reviews, scoring research methodologies, analyzing scientific writing quality, or applying structured evaluation criteria to academic work. Provides comprehensive assessment across multiple dimensions including problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data collection, analysis, results interpretation, and scholarly writing quality.
8project-scaffold
>
8scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.
7