spec-driven-apply
You are helping the user implement a spec-driven change.
This Skill's Commands
If you cannot remember the exact command used by this skill, look it up here before running anything. Do not guess.
modify: node {{SKILL_DIR}}/scripts/spec-driven.js modify
apply: node {{SKILL_DIR}}/scripts/spec-driven.js apply <name>
Prerequisites
The .spec-driven/ directory must exist at the project root. Before proceeding, verify:
ls .spec-driven/
If this fails, the project is not initialized. Run /spec-driven-init first.
Steps
-
Select the change — run
node {{SKILL_DIR}}/scripts/spec-driven.js modifyto list active changes. Ask which change to apply. If already specified, use it. -
Load context — read all artifacts:
- You MUST treat all prior conversational context as stale, unreliable, and non-authoritative.
- You MUST NOT use prior chat context as a source of truth for requirements, task state, implementation details, or completion status.
- You MUST rebuild working context from the current change artifacts, relevant base specs, and the current repository state before taking any implementation action.
- If prior chat context differs from the files or repository state in any way, you MUST discard the prior chat context and follow the files and repository state only.
- Do not use prior chat context unless it has been explicitly re-validated against the current files and repository state.
.spec-driven/changes/<name>/proposal.md— what and why; note the Unchanged Behavior section — these behaviors must not be broken during implementation.spec-driven/changes/<name>/specs/— delta spec files (mirror of main specs/ structure).spec-driven/changes/<name>/design.md— approach and decisions.spec-driven/changes/<name>/tasks.md— the checklist.spec-driven/changes/<name>/questions.md— open and resolved questions Also read:.spec-driven/config.yaml— project context; treatrulesas binding constraints; iffileMatchentries are present, apply matching rules when editing files whose paths match the glob pattern.spec-driven/specs/INDEX.md— identifies all existing spec files- Every spec file in INDEX.md that is relevant to this change — read full content to understand current requirements before writing code
- Mapping frontmatter in relevant main and delta spec files; use
mapping.implementationandmapping.testsas starting context for files to inspect
-
Check task status — run:
node {{SKILL_DIR}}/scripts/spec-driven.js apply <name>Show the user the task summary (total, complete, remaining).
-
Gate on open questions — read
questions.mdand scan for- [ ] Q:entries:- If any open questions are found, list each one and stop before implementation
- For each open question, present a structured user-facing block with:
QuestionExplanationImpactRecommendation
Explanationmust clarify why the question is still unresolved after reading the change artifacts, relevant main specs, and current repository stateImpactmust describe what implementation choice, task, behavior, or unchanged-behavior guarantee depends on the answerRecommendationmay suggest a preferred answer, but only as a suggestion- Do not implement tasks, edit implementation files, or mark the question resolved until the user explicitly answers or confirms the decision
- Only continue once all questions are resolved in
questions.mdunder## Resolvedwith anA:answer
-
Implement tasks — work through each
- [ ]task in order:- Read relevant code before making changes
- Implement the task
- Verify the change does not violate any Unchanged Behavior listed in proposal.md
- For
## Testingtasks: actually run the tests (lint, unit tests) and confirm they pass before marking complete - Mark it complete in tasks.md by changing
- [ ]to- [x] - Briefly confirm what was done before moving to the next task
-
Update delta specs — after all tasks are done, re-read each file in
changes/<name>/specs/and verify it accurately reflects what was actually implemented:- If the implementation diverged from the original plan, update the affected files
- If additional spec files need to be created or modified, do so now
- Update delta spec mapping frontmatter so
mapping.implementationandmapping.testslist the actual implementation and test files changed or relied on
-
On completion — when all tasks are done and delta spec is accurate:
- Run
node {{SKILL_DIR}}/scripts/spec-driven.js apply <name>again to confirm 0 remaining - Suggest running
/spec-driven-verify <name>to verify the implementation
- Run
Rules
- Read existing code before modifying it
- Complete tasks in order unless there is a clear dependency reason to skip
- Mark tasks complete immediately after implementing them, not in bulk at the end
- If a task is ambiguous, read proposal.md and design.md before asking the user
- Do not implement tasks that are already marked
- [x] - Open questions require explicit user resolution before implementation starts
- Recommendations do not count as resolved answers until the user confirms them
- Keep implementation and test mappings in frontmatter, not in requirement prose
More from kw12121212/auto-spec-driven
spec-driven-auto
Run the full spec-driven workflow automatically. Proposes, implements, verifies, reviews, and archives a change without mandatory confirmation — only stops for user input when open questions need resolution.
36spec-driven-review
Review the code quality of a spec-driven change. Checks readability, security, performance, and best practices before archiving.
36spec-driven-init
Initialize a .spec-driven/ directory in a project. Creates config.yaml, roadmap/, and specs/ scaffold, then guides the user to fill in project context.
35spec-driven-verify
Verify a spec-driven change is complete and correctly implemented. Checks task completion, implementation evidence, and spec alignment.
35spec-driven-archive
Archive a completed spec-driven change. Requires completed tasks, merges delta specs into main specs, then moves the change to archive/ with a date prefix.
35spec-driven-brainstorm
Discuss and brainstorm a spec-driven change from a rough idea, then propose a change name and, after explicit confirmation, generate the same five proposal artifacts as spec-driven-propose.
35