aif-qa
QA — Implementation Testing
Generates change summaries, produces test plans, and describes test scenarios for a feature or task implementation.
Modes
The skill operates in three sequential modes.
| Argument | Mode | What you do |
|---|---|---|
change-summary |
Change summary | Analyze what changed, assess risks, produce a summary |
test-plan |
Test plan | Create a structured test plan based on the change summary |
test-cases |
Test cases | Describe concrete test scenarios based on the plan |
--all |
Full pipeline | Run all three modes in sequence without prompting between stages |
Workflow
Step 0: Load Config
FIRST: Read .ai-factory/config.yaml if it exists to resolve:
- Paths:
paths.description,paths.architecture,paths.qa(default:.ai-factory/qa) - Language:
language.uifor AskUserQuestion prompts, progress messages, final summaries, and next-step guidancelanguage.artifactsfor generated QA artifactslanguage.technical_termsfor human-readable technical terminology style when generating artifacts- If
language.artifactsis missing, uselanguage.ui - If both are missing, use
en
- Git:
git.enabledandgit.base_branchfor branch comparison
If config.yaml doesn't exist, use defaults:
- DESCRIPTION.md:
.ai-factory/DESCRIPTION.md - ARCHITECTURE.md:
.ai-factory/ARCHITECTURE.md - QA artifacts:
.ai-factory/qa/ ui_language:enartifact_language:entechnical_terms_policy:keep- Git enabled:
true - Git base branch:
main
Store:
ui_language = language.ui || "en"artifact_language = language.artifacts || language.ui || "en"technical_terms_policy = language.technical_terms || "keep"git_enabled = git.enabledwhen present, otherwisetruebase_branch = git.base_branch || "main"
All AskUserQuestion prompts, user-visible explanations, stage completion messages, and next-step guidance MUST be written in ui_language.
All generated artifacts (change-summary.md, test-plan.md, test-cases.md) MUST be written in artifact_language.
Templates define structure, not language. Use the canonical English templates in templates/*.md. If artifact_language is not en, translate them to artifact_language before saving: headings, labels, checklist items, placeholders, enum labels, risk labels, and explanatory text must be in artifact_language.
Do not use English templates verbatim when artifact_language is not en. Preserve markdown structure, table shapes, checkbox syntax, test case IDs (TC-001), code identifiers, paths, commands, branch names, config keys, API names, package names, and raw error messages.
For artifact_language = ru, write human-readable prose, headings, risks, priorities, recommendations, test steps, and expected results in Russian. Keep code identifiers, filenames, branch names, commands, config keys, API names, and raw error text unchanged.
Apply technical_terms_policy while writing artifacts:
keep— keep common technical terms such ascommit,branch,diff,endpoint,payload,rollback,regression, andfixturewhen that is clearer for the project audiencetranslate— translate human-readable technical terms where a natural target-language term existsmixed— translate ordinary prose terms while keeping code, infrastructure, and ecosystem terms unchanged
If git_enabled = false or the current directory is not a git work tree, do not run git diff/log commands. Use manual change context mode instead: ask the user in ui_language to provide one of these sources of change context before running change-summary: pasted diff, changed file list, short implementation description, or cancel.
Step 0.1: Load Project Context
Read the resolved description path if the file exists, to understand:
- Tech stack (language, framework, database, ORM)
- Project architecture and coding conventions
- Non-functional requirements
Read the resolved architecture path if the file exists, to understand:
- Chosen architecture pattern
- Folder structure conventions
- Layer/module boundaries and dependency rules
Use this context when generating summaries, test plans, and test cases.
Read .ai-factory/skill-context/aif-qa/SKILL.md — MANDATORY if the file exists.
This file contains project-specific rules accumulated by /aif-evolve from patches,
codebase conventions, and tech-stack analysis. These rules are tailored to the current project.
How to apply skill-context rules:
- Treat them as project-level overrides for this skill's general instructions
- When a skill-context rule conflicts with a general rule written in this SKILL.md, the skill-context rule wins
- When there is no conflict, apply both: general rules from SKILL.md + project rules from skill-context
Step 0.2: Parse Arguments and Resolve Branch
Parse $ARGUMENTS fully before doing anything else:
- Detect
--allflag — if present, setall_mode = trueand remove the flag from arguments - Detect mode — first word matching
change-summary,test-plan, ortest-cases; remove it from arguments - Detect branch — remaining text (if any) is the target branch name
Resolve the working branch:
If git_enabled = false or the repository is not a git work tree:
If branch was provided in arguments → use it as the resolved branch label
Otherwise → set resolved_branch = "manual"
Use manual change context mode for analysis
If git_enabled = true and the repository is a git work tree:
If branch was provided in arguments → use it as the resolved branch
Otherwise → run: git branch --show-current
Store both values for use in all reference files:
-
resolved_branch— the branch being analyzed (used to locate/save artifacts) -
artifact_dir—<resolved paths.qa>/<branch-slug>, wherebranch-slugis a deterministic, filesystem-safe, collision-resistant slug derived fromresolved_branch. Compute it in three steps:- Safe slug. Take
resolved_branchand replace every character that is not in[A-Za-z0-9._-]with-, collapse runs of consecutive-into a single-, and trim leading/trailing-. If the result is empty, usebranch. Optionally truncate to 40 characters. Call thissafe_slug. - Hash suffix. Run
git hash-object --stdin <<< "<resolved_branch>"and take the first 8 hex characters of the output. Call thishash8. The hash is derived from the original, unnormalized branch name so branches that collapse to the samesafe_slugstill produce different derived slugs in normal use. - Combine:
branch-slug = "<safe_slug>-<hash8>".
Why the hash: a readable slug alone is lossy —
feature/fooandfeature-foonormalize to the samesafe_slugand would overwrite each other's artifacts. Appending a short hash of the full original name keeps the derived slug stable, readable, and collision-resistant for practical branch naming.Examples:
feature/foo→safe_slug=feature-foo,hash8=a72ccce7→feature-foo-a72ccce7feature-foo→safe_slug=feature-foo,hash8=6f80dfc6→feature-foo-6f80dfc6main→safe_slug=main,hash8=<computed>→main-<hash8>
- Safe slug. Take
-
all_mode— whether to skip inter-stage prompts
If no mode was provided and all_mode = false — ask the user in ui_language:
AskUserQuestion in `ui_language`.
Meaning: ask which QA mode to run.
Options meaning:
1. Change summary (`change-summary`) — analyze what changed, assess risks, produce a summary
2. Test plan (`test-plan`) — create a structured test plan based on the change summary
3. Test cases (`test-cases`) — describe concrete test scenarios based on the plan
4. Full pipeline (`--all`) — run all three modes in sequence
Step 1: Execute the Selected Mode
The skill runs strictly sequentially — each stage uses the artifact from the previous one:
change-summary → test-plan → test-cases
Read the detailed instructions for the selected mode:
Change Summary (change-summary)
Read references/CHANGE-SUMMARY.md
Test Plan (test-plan)
Read references/TEST-PLAN.md
Test Cases (test-cases)
Read references/TEST-CASES.md
Full Pipeline (--all)
Run all three modes in sequence. After each stage completes successfully,
proceed to the next automatically — do NOT show the inter-stage AskUserQuestion.
1. Execute change-summary (references/CHANGE-SUMMARY.md) → save artifact
2. Execute test-plan (references/TEST-PLAN.md) → save artifact
3. Execute test-cases (references/TEST-CASES.md) → save artifact
4. Show context cleanup prompt (Step 6 of TEST-CASES.md)
If any stage fails (e.g. git error, diff too large and user cancels) — stop the pipeline and report which stage failed.
Principles
DO:
- Understand the subject before writing test plans and test cases (analyze changes / test plan / merge request / task / text description)
- Use the repository code only to the extent needed for the change analysis, test plan, and test cases
- Write steps clearly enough that any tester can execute the test without knowledge of the codebase
- Specify concrete test data, not abstract "enter valid data"
- Prioritize — not everything is equally important
- Think about adjacent systems, integrations, and dependencies
- Include negative scenarios and edge cases — they catch most bugs
- Ask clarifying questions when business logic is not obvious from the code
DO NOT:
- Replace the manual QA plan with automated test implementation details
- Make assumptions about business logic without reading the code
- Skip negative scenarios
- Write test cases for everything — focus on risky areas
- Ignore data edge cases
Do not replace the manual QA plan with automated test implementation details. You may mention existing automated checks only as supporting verification; the primary output must remain manual QA scenarios.
Priority Reference
| Priority | When to use |
|---|---|
| High | Core business logic, user data, payments, security, authorization |
| Medium | Supporting functionality, UI/UX, reports, integrations |
| Low | Cosmetic changes, rare scenarios, nice-to-have |
Artifact Ownership and Config Policy
- Primary ownership: QA artifacts under
<paths.qa>/<branch-slug>/— specificallychange-summary.md,test-plan.md, andtest-cases.md. The--allflag respects the same boundary. - Write policy: persistent writes are limited to the three owned artifacts above; no other files are created or modified.
- Config policy: config-aware, read-only. Reads
paths.description,paths.architecture,paths.qa,language.ui,language.artifacts,language.technical_terms,git.enabled, andgit.base_branch; never writesconfig.yaml.
Critical Rules
- MUST NOT create a
test-planwithout achange-summaryartifact - MUST NOT create
test-caseswithout atest-planartifact - MUST NOT skip stages
More from lee-to/ai-factory
aif-skill-generator
Generate professional Agent Skills for AI agents. Creates complete skill packages with SKILL.md, references, scripts, and templates. Use when creating new skills, generating custom slash commands, or building reusable AI capabilities. Validates against Agent Skills specification.
39aif-implement
Execute implementation tasks from the current plan. Works through tasks sequentially, marks completion, and preserves progress for continuation across sessions. Use when user says "implement", "start coding", "execute plan", or "continue implementation".
38aif-security-checklist
Security audit checklist based on OWASP Top 10 and best practices. Covers authentication, injection, XSS, CSRF, secrets management, and more. Use when reviewing security, before deploy, asking "is this secure", "security check", "vulnerability".
36aif-plan
Plan implementation for a feature or task. Two modes — fast (single quick plan) or full (richer plan with optional git branch/worktree flow). Use when user says "plan", "new feature", "start feature", "create tasks".
35aif-improve
Refine and enhance an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase, checks for gaps, missing tasks, wrong dependencies, and improves the plan quality. Use after /aif-plan to polish the plan before implementation, or to improve an existing /aif-fix plan.
34aif-commit
Create conventional commit messages by analyzing staged changes. Generates semantic commit messages following the Conventional Commits specification. Use when user says "commit", "save changes", or "create commit".
34