research-proposal

Malicious tool definition detected

Tool: SKILL.md [1/3] Description: --- name: research-proposal description: > Generate academic research proposals for PhD applications. Use when user asks to "write a research proposal", "create PhD proposal", "generate research plan", "撰写研究计划", "写博士申请", "doctoral proposal", or mentions specific research topics for PhD application. Supports STEM, humanities, and social sciences with field-specific adaptations.

Tool: SKILL.md [2/3] Description: as flowing, connected prose rather than bulleted lists or numbered items.

Tool: SKILL.md [3/3] Description: - [ ] Balance across different research groups/institutions #### Technical - [ ] No grammatical errors - [ ] Abbreviations defined on first use - [ ] Consistent terminology - [ ] Proper markdown formatting ### Format Conversion Guidance Provide user with conversion instructions: ```bash # Convert to Word document pandoc proposal.md -o proposal.docx # Convert to PDF (requires LaTeX) pandoc proposal.md -o proposal.pdf # Convert to PDF with custom styling pandoc pr

Malicious tool definition detected

Tool: assets/proposal_scaffold_en.md [1/2] Description: # [Research Title: Include Key Concepts, Research Object, and Approach] **Degree Program:** Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) **Field/Department:** [Your Field] **Target Institution:** [University/Institution Name] **Date:** [Month Year] **Word Count:** [Approximately 3,000 words] --- ## Abstract [Write 150-300 words summarizing the entire proposal.

Tool: assets/proposal_scaffold_en.md [2/2] Description: each phase to improve readability.

Malicious tool definition detected

Tool: assets/proposal_scaffold_zh.md Description: # [研究题目：包含核心概念、研究对象与研究路径] **学位类型：** 博士研究生 **学科/院系：** [所属学科] **目标院校：** [大学/研究机构名称] **日期：** [年月] **字数：** [约3,000字] --- ## 摘要 [撰写150-300字，概述整个研究计划。包含：] [背景：1-2句确立研究领域及其重要性] [问题：1-2句指出具体的研究空白或问题] [目标：1-2句陈述本研究的目标] [方法：2-3句简要描述研究方法] [意义：1-2句说明预期贡献和影响] **关键词：** [关键词1]；[关键词2]；[关键词3]；[关键词4]；[关键词5] --- ## 一、引言 ### 1.1 研究背景 [150-250字] [开头句：确立研究领域的重要性] [展开段落：近年发展趋势，为何该领域值得关注] [关键数据或事实，证明研究的必要性] [逐步聚焦到具体研究主题] ### 1.2 问题陈述 [150-200字] [指出当前知识/实践中的具体问题或空白] [解释该

Malicious tool definition detected

Tool: references/DOMAIN_TEMPLATES.md [1/2] Description: # Domain-Specific Templates Guidance for adapting research proposals to different academic domains. --- ## Overview: Domain Differences | Dimension | STEM | Humanities | Social Sciences | |-----------|------|------------|-----------------| | **Length** | Shorter (2,000-3,000) | Longer (3,000-10,000) | Medium (2,500-4,000) | | **Focus** | Methodology, experiments | Theory, interpretation | Methods + theory | | **Hypothesis** | Explicit, test

Tool: references/DOMAIN_TEMPLATES.md [2/2] Description: of [text] reveals..." - "situating [phenomenon] within [context] allows us to see..." - "this analysis complicates the prevailing narrative by..." - "reading [source] against [context] demonstrates..." --- ## Social Sciences Domain (Sociology, Psychology, Economics, Political Science) ### Structural Emphasis ``` Social Sciences Proposal Structure (~3,000 words) Abstract 200-250 words (7%) Introduction 500-600 words (18%) - Background 200 wo

Malicious tool definition detected

Tool: references/LITERATURE_WORKFLOW.md [1/2] Description: # Literature Collection Workflow Guide for gathering relevant literature during research proposal generation.

Tool: references/LITERATURE_WORKFLOW.md [2/2] Description: Literature Collection Summary ### Background/Context (n papers) | Citation | Key Points | Use In | |----------|------------|--------| | Author (Year) | Main finding | Introduction | ### State-of-the-Art (n papers) | Citation | Key Points | Use In | |----------|------------|--------| | Author (Year) | Current best method | Lit Review | ### Gap-Identifying (n papers) | Citation | Identified Gap | Use In | |----------|----------------|-----

Malicious tool definition detected

Tool: references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md [1/2]

Tool: references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md [2/2] Description: (if applicable) - [ ] Reproducibility considered ### Humanities Proposals - [ ] Central argument clear - [ ] Theoretical sophistication demonstrated - [ ] Primary sources identified - [ ] Archive/field access addressed - [ ] Chapter outline provided - [ ] Language requirements noted - [ ] Interpretive framework justified ### Social Sciences Proposals - [ ] Research questions theory-linked - [ ] Sampling strategy justified - [ ] Instruments

Malicious tool definition detected

Tool: references/STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md [1/2] Description: # Research Proposal Structure Guide Detailed writing guidance for each section of a PhD research proposal.

Tool: references/STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md [2/2] Description: Methods (150-250 words) - What data will you collect?

Malicious tool definition detected

Tool: references/WRITING_STYLE_GUIDE.md [1/3] Description: # Academic Writing Style Guide Based on Nature Reviews journal conventions and academic writing best practices.

Tool: references/WRITING_STYLE_GUIDE.md [2/3] Description: - "本研究有望推进[领域]的发展。" - "研究结果可能为[理论/实践]提供新的视角。" - "本研究预期将为[问题]的理解提供新的启示。" ``` ### Sentence Variety **Vary sentence length:** - Mix short (10-15 words) and longer (20-30 words) sentences - Use short sentences for key points - Use longer sentences for complex relationships **Vary sentence structure:** - Simple: Subject-Verb-Object - Compound: Clause + Conjunction + Clause - Complex: Main clause + Subordinate clause - Periodic: Build to main

Tool: references/WRITING_STYLE_GUIDE.md [3/3] Description: Better: "ultimately" / "in summary" Avoid: "a game-changer" Better: "a significant advancement" ``` ### Redundancy ``` Avoid: "past history" / "future plans" / "basic fundamentals" Better: "history" / "plans" / "fundamentals" Avoid: "in order to" Better: "to" ``` ### Anthropomorphism (attributing human qualities to non-human things) ``` Avoid: "The data wants to show..." Better: "The data indicate..." Avoid: "This study tries to..." Bett