dotnet-managedcode-communication
ManagedCode.Communication
Trigger On
- integrating
ManagedCode.Communicationinto services or APIs - replacing exception-driven result handling with explicit results
- reviewing service boundaries that return success or failure payloads
- documenting result-pattern usage across ASP.NET Core or application services
Workflow
- Confirm the boundary where the library belongs:
- service result contracts
- application manager boundaries
- API endpoints that translate results into HTTP responses
- Keep result creation and error mapping explicit instead of mixing exceptions, nulls, and ad-hoc tuples.
- Pattern-match result objects at the boundary that converts them into user-facing responses.
- Do not hide domain failures behind generic success wrappers.
- Validate positive, negative, and error-path handling after integration.
flowchart LR
A["Domain or service operation"] --> B["ManagedCode.Communication result"]
B --> C["Application or API boundary"]
C --> D["HTTP response or caller-visible contract"]
Deliver
- guidance on where explicit result objects improve clarity
- usage boundaries for translating results into API or caller responses
- validation expectations for success and failure flows
Validate
- result handling is consistent across the boundary that uses the library
- callers do not fall back to exception-only logic for normal failure cases
- negative and error scenarios are documented and tested
More from managedcode/dotnet-skills
dotnet
Primary router skill for broad .NET work. Classify the repo by app model and cross-cutting concern first, then switch to the narrowest matching .NET skill instead of staying at a generic layer.
18dotnet-aspnet-core
Build, debug, modernize, or review ASP.NET Core applications with correct hosting, middleware, security, configuration, logging, and deployment patterns on current .NET.
13dotnet-entity-framework-core
Design, tune, or review EF Core data access with proper modeling, migrations, query translation, performance, and lifetime management for modern .NET applications.
12dotnet-code-review
Review .NET changes for bugs, regressions, architectural drift, missing tests, incorrect async or disposal behavior, and platform-specific pitfalls before you approve or merge them.
11dotnet-architecture
Design or review .NET solution architecture across modular monoliths, clean architecture, vertical slices, microservices, DDD, CQRS, and cloud-native boundaries without over-engineering.
11dotnet-signalr
Implement or review SignalR hubs, streaming, reconnection, transport, and real-time delivery patterns in ASP.NET Core applications.
10