conventional-commit
Summary
Structured commit message format following the Conventional Commits specification.
- Defines 12 commit types (feat, fix, refactor, docs, test, chore, ci, build, perf, style, deps, revert) with clear purposes and semantic versioning correlation
- Enforces a required header format with optional scope and body, all lines under 100 characters, subject line capped at 70 characters
- Includes guidelines for imperative present-tense language, body content explaining what and why, and support for BREAKING CHANGE footers to signal major version bumps
- Provides branch naming conventions matching commit types and examples covering simple fixes, features with scope, refactors, breaking changes, and reverts
SKILL.md
Conventional Commit Messages
Follow these conventions when creating commits.
Prerequisites
Before committing, ensure you're working on a feature branch, not the main branch.
# Check current branch
git branch --show-current
If you're on main or master, create a new branch first:
# Create and switch to a new branch
git checkout -b <type>/<short-description>
Branch naming should follow the pattern: <type>/<short-description> where type matches the commit type (e.g., feat/add-user-auth, fix/null-pointer-error, refactor/extract-validation).
Format
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
<body>
<footer>
The header is required. Scope is optional. All lines must stay under 100 characters.
Commit Types
| Type | Purpose |
|---|---|
build |
Build system or CI changes |
chore |
Routine maintenance tasks |
ci |
Continuous integration configuration |
deps |
Dependency updates |
docs |
Documentation changes |
feat |
New feature |
fix |
Bug fix |
perf |
Performance improvement |
refactor |
Code refactoring (no behavior change) |
revert |
Revert a previous commit |
style |
Code style and formatting |
test |
Tests added, updated or improved |
Subject Line Rules
- Use imperative, present tense: "Add feature" not "Added feature"
- Capitalize the first letter
- No period at the end
- Maximum 70 characters
Body Guidelines
- Explain what and why, not how
- Use imperative mood and present tense
- Include motivation for the change
- Contrast with previous behavior when relevant
Conventional Commits
The commit contains the following structural elements, to communicate intent to the consumers of your library:
- fix: a commit of the type fix patches a bug in your codebase (this correlates with PATCH in Semantic Versioning).
- feat: a commit of the type feat introduces a new feature to the codebase (this correlates with MINOR in Semantic Versioning).
- BREAKING CHANGE: a commit that has a footer BREAKING CHANGE:, or appends a ! after the type/scope, introduces a breaking API change (correlating with MAJOR in Semantic Versioning). A BREAKING CHANGE can be part of commits of any type.
- types other than fix: and feat: are allowed, for example @commitlint/config-conventional (based on the Angular convention) recommends build:, chore:, ci:, docs:, style:, refactor:, perf:, test:, and others.
- footers other than BREAKING CHANGE: may be provided and follow a convention similar to git trailer format.
Examples
Simple fix
fix(api): Handle null response in user endpoint
The user API could return null for deleted accounts, causing a crash
in the dashboard. Add null check before accessing user properties.
Feature with scope
feat(alerts): Add Slack thread replies for alert updates
When an alert is updated or resolved, post a reply to the original
Slack thread instead of creating a new message. This keeps related
notifications grouped together.
Refactor
refactor: Extract common validation logic to shared module
Move duplicate validation code from three endpoints into a shared
validator class. No behavior change.
Breaking change
feat(api)!: Remove deprecated v1 endpoints
Remove all v1 API endpoints that were deprecated in version 23.1.
Clients should migrate to v2 endpoints.
BREAKING CHANGE: v1 endpoints no longer available
Revert Format
revert: feat(api): Add new endpoint
This reverts commit abc123def456.
Reason: Caused performance regression in production.
Principles
- Each commit should be a single, stable change
- Commits should be independently reviewable
- The repository should be in a working state after each commit
References
Weekly Installs
572
Repository
marcelorodrigo/…t-skillsGitHub Stars
6
First Seen
Jan 31, 2026
Security Audits
Installed on
opencode506
github-copilot455
codex427
gemini-cli415
kimi-cli380
amp379