planning-with-files
This skill uses Claude hooks which can execute code automatically in response to events. Review carefully before installing.
Planning with Files
Work like Manus: Use persistent markdown files as your "working memory on disk."
FIRST: Check for Previous Session (v2.2.0)
Before starting work, check for unsynced context from a previous session:
# Linux/macOS
$(command -v python3 || command -v python) ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/session-catchup.py "$(pwd)"
# Windows PowerShell
& (Get-Command python -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue).Source "$env:USERPROFILE\.claude\skills\planning-with-files\scripts\session-catchup.py" (Get-Location)
If catchup report shows unsynced context:
- Run
git diff --statto see actual code changes - Read current planning files
- Update planning files based on catchup + git diff
- Then proceed with task
Important: Where Files Go
- Templates are in
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/ - Your planning files go in your project directory
| Location | What Goes There |
|---|---|
Skill directory (${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/) |
Templates, scripts, reference docs |
| Your project directory | task_plan.md, findings.md, progress.md |
Quick Start
Before ANY complex task:
- Create
task_plan.md— Use templates/task_plan.md as reference - Create
findings.md— Use templates/findings.md as reference - Create
progress.md— Use templates/progress.md as reference - Re-read plan before decisions — Refreshes goals in attention window
- Update after each phase — Mark complete, log errors
Note: Planning files go in your project root, not the skill installation folder.
The Core Pattern
Context Window = RAM (volatile, limited)
Filesystem = Disk (persistent, unlimited)
→ Anything important gets written to disk.
File Purposes
| File | Purpose | When to Update |
|---|---|---|
task_plan.md |
Phases, progress, decisions | After each phase |
findings.md |
Research, discoveries | After ANY discovery |
progress.md |
Session log, test results | Throughout session |
Critical Rules
1. Create Plan First
Never start a complex task without task_plan.md. Non-negotiable.
2. The 2-Action Rule
"After every 2 view/browser/search operations, IMMEDIATELY save key findings to text files."
This prevents visual/multimodal information from being lost.
3. Read Before Decide
Before major decisions, read the plan file. This keeps goals in your attention window.
4. Update After Act
After completing any phase:
- Mark phase status:
in_progress→complete - Log any errors encountered
- Note files created/modified
5. Log ALL Errors
Every error goes in the plan file. This builds knowledge and prevents repetition.
## Errors Encountered
| Error | Attempt | Resolution |
| ----------------- | ------- | ---------------------- |
| FileNotFoundError | 1 | Created default config |
| API timeout | 2 | Added retry logic |
6. Never Repeat Failures
if action_failed:
next_action != same_action
Track what you tried. Mutate the approach.
The 3-Strike Error Protocol
ATTEMPT 1: Diagnose & Fix
→ Read error carefully
→ Identify root cause
→ Apply targeted fix
ATTEMPT 2: Alternative Approach
→ Same error? Try different method
→ Different tool? Different library?
→ NEVER repeat exact same failing action
ATTEMPT 3: Broader Rethink
→ Question assumptions
→ Search for solutions
→ Consider updating the plan
AFTER 3 FAILURES: Escalate to User
→ Explain what you tried
→ Share the specific error
→ Ask for guidance
Read vs Write Decision Matrix
| Situation | Action | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Just wrote a file | DON'T read | Content still in context |
| Viewed image/PDF | Write findings NOW | Multimodal → text before lost |
| Browser returned data | Write to file | Screenshots don't persist |
| Starting new phase | Read plan/findings | Re-orient if context stale |
| Error occurred | Read relevant file | Need current state to fix |
| Resuming after gap | Read all planning files | Recover state |
The 5-Question Reboot Test
If you can answer these, your context management is solid:
| Question | Answer Source |
|---|---|
| Where am I? | Current phase in task_plan.md |
| Where am I going? | Remaining phases |
| What's the goal? | Goal statement in plan |
| What have I learned? | findings.md |
| What have I done? | progress.md |
When to Use This Pattern
Use for:
- Multi-step tasks (3+ steps)
- Research tasks
- Building/creating projects
- Tasks spanning many tool calls
- Anything requiring organization
Skip for:
- Simple questions
- Single-file edits
- Quick lookups
Templates
Copy these templates to start:
- templates/task_plan.md — Phase tracking
- templates/findings.md — Research storage
- templates/progress.md — Session logging
Scripts
Helper scripts for automation:
scripts/init-session.sh— Initialize all planning filesscripts/check-complete.sh— Verify all phases completescripts/session-catchup.py— Recover context from previous session (v2.2.0)
Advanced Topics
- Manus Principles: See reference.md
- Real Examples: See examples.md
Anti-Patterns
| Don't | Do Instead |
|---|---|
| Use TodoWrite for persistence | Create task_plan.md file |
| State goals once and forget | Re-read plan before decisions |
| Hide errors and retry silently | Log errors to plan file |
| Stuff everything in context | Store large content in files |
| Start executing immediately | Create plan file FIRST |
| Repeat failed actions | Track attempts, mutate approach |
| Create files in skill directory | Create files in your project |
More from marcoax/skills
code-review
>
10pessimistic-code-review
>
10grill-me
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".
8skill-optimizer
>
8current-file-review
Review changes in one explicitly identified current or open file against project best practices. Use only when the user clearly refers to the current file, says "this file", "current file", "open file", or provides a single file path to review. Do not use for generic review requests, branch diffs, commits, or repository-wide review; use code-review or a stack-specific review skill instead. Operates in PLAN MODE - proposes improvements, waits for approval before executing.
8task-spec-creator
Generate a structured TASK_SPEC.md for a single implementation task, sprint ticket, or technical work item by interviewing the developer. Use when the user wants to define one concrete task, capture implementation requirements, document acceptance criteria, or says things like "creiamo una specifica", "voglio definire la task", "ho un ticket da implementare", or "partiamo dalla specifica". Do not use for product-level feature discovery or PRDs; use write-a-prd for that. Do not use for incremental refactor roadmaps; use request-refactor-plan for that.
7