Workflow

Step 1 — Parse the PR URL

Extract owner, repo, pr_number from the URL: https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/pull/{pr_number}

Step 2 — Fetch PR metadata + diff

Use the GitHub API. If a token is available in context or provided by user, use it.

# PR metadata
curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer {token}" \
  -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3+json" \
  "https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}"

# Diff
curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer {token}" \
  -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3.diff" \
  "https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}"

If no token provided and repo is private → ask user for a GitHub token. If repo is public → token optional.

Step 3 — Identify languages/frameworks

Scan changed files for:

.php + artisan/composer.json → apply laravel-best-practices
.php (no Laravel) → apply php-the-right-way
.cs → apply csharp-best-practices
.ts/.tsx + React → apply Inertia/React rules from laravel-best-practices if in Laravel context
Any language → apply universal rules below

Step 4 — Review the diff

Apply rules from references/universal-rules.md. Apply language-specific skill rules if detected.

Step 5 — Output structured review

Format:

## PR Review: {title}
**Author:** {author} | **Files:** {changed_files} | **+{additions}/-{deletions}**

### 🔴 Must fix ({count})
### 🟡 Should fix ({count})
### ⚪ Suggestions ({count})

---
### Finding: {title}
**Severity:** 🔴 / 🟡 / ⚪
**File:** `path/to/file.ext` (line N)
**Issue:** clear description
**Fix:**
\`\`\`diff
- bad code
+ good code
\`\`\`

---
### Summary
Overall verdict: ✅ Approve / 🔄 Request changes / 💬 Comment

Token Storage

If user provides a GitHub token, store it for future use in: /home/node/.openclaw/.openclaw/workspace/TOOLS.md under ### GitHub

Rules Reference

See references/universal-rules.md for language-agnostic review rules.

pr-review