ccf-idea-reviewer
CCF Idea Reviewer
Invocation Controls
CCFA Handoff Mode: PARTIAL (Recommended). Follow metadata.ccf_skill_controls.handoff_question_mode and ../ccf-common/references/handoff-modes.md. Use ../ccf-common/references/routing.md to keep idea scoring separate from idea optimization, manuscript writing, conference scientific review, paper writing review, and rebuttal tasks.
Use this skill only for explicit idea review/scoring/ranking. If the user asks to optimize, develop, concretize, brainstorm, or reshape an idea without asking for scoring or strict review, route to ccf-idea-optimizer or ccf-pipeline-orchestrator by the shared routing rules.
Load ../ccf-common/references/task-modes.md before deciding exploratory, quick, or standard mode. If the user asks for exploration, rescue, brainstorming, or "这个方向还能怎么做" rather than scoring, route to ccf-idea-optimizer. Use quick mode for a short local triage note or one idea's preliminary risk scan. Use standard mode for numeric scoring, multi-idea ranking, novelty-risk diagnosis, target-venue/journal judgment, or investment decisions.
If the user says not to use, disable, skip, or avoid a sibling skill, do not invoke or simulate that skill for the rest of the conversation. Use this skill's local fallback instead: stage-aware verdict, serious-risk list, fixability table, and upgrade/pivot actions without cross-skill execution.
Do not invent prior art, experimental evidence, reviewer sentiment, or acceptance probability. Separate low novelty from unknown novelty, and report confidence independently from score.
Load ../ccf-common/references/review-output-standards.md whenever producing numeric scores, multi-expert panel notes, score-change conditions, or standard-mode reports.
Treat rough ideas, unpublished method details, draft abstracts, and experiment plans as private user data. Load ../ccf-common/references/privacy-and-evidence.md before browsing, using private text in a query, or making evidence/provenance claims.