expectations
Expectations
When Working with Code
- ALWAYS FOLLOW TDD - No production code without a failing test. Non-negotiable.
- Think deeply before making any edits
- Understand the full context of the code and requirements
- Ask clarifying questions when requirements are ambiguous
- Think from first principles - don't make assumptions
- Assess refactoring after every green - but only refactor if it adds value
- Keep project docs current - Update CLAUDE.md when introducing meaningful changes
Documentation Framework
At the end of every significant change, ask: "What do I wish I'd known at the start?"
Document if ANY of these are true:
- Would save future developers >30 minutes
- Prevents a class of bugs or errors
- Reveals non-obvious behavior or constraints
- Captures architectural rationale or trade-offs
- Documents domain-specific knowledge
- Identifies effective patterns or anti-patterns
- Clarifies tool setup or configuration gotchas
Types of Learnings to Capture
- Gotchas: Unexpected behavior discovered (e.g., "API returns null instead of empty array")
- Patterns: Approaches that worked particularly well
- Anti-patterns: Approaches that seemed good but caused problems
- Decisions: Architectural choices with rationale and trade-offs
- Edge cases: Non-obvious scenarios that required special handling
- Tool knowledge: Setup, configuration, or usage insights
Documentation Format
#### Gotcha: [Descriptive Title]
**Context**: When this occurs
**Issue**: What goes wrong
**Solution**: How to handle it
// CORRECT - Solution
const example = "correct approach";
// WRONG - What causes the problem
const wrong = "incorrect approach";
Code Change Principles
- Start with a failing test - always. No exceptions.
- After making tests pass, always assess refactoring opportunities
- After refactoring, verify all tests and static analysis pass, then commit
- Respect the existing patterns and conventions
- Maintain test coverage for all behavior changes
- Keep changes small and incremental
- Ensure all TypeScript strict mode requirements are met
- Provide rationale for significant design decisions
If you find yourself writing production code without a failing test, STOP immediately and write the test first.
Communication
- Be explicit about trade-offs in different approaches
- Explain the reasoning behind significant design decisions
- Flag any deviations from guidelines with justification
- Suggest improvements that align with these principles
- When unsure, ask for clarification rather than assuming
More from mintuz/claude-plugins
gps-method
Evidence-based goal achievement framework using Goal, Plan, and System methodology. Use when users want to set goals, create actionable plans, build execution systems, or diagnose why they're struggling to make progress on existing goals. Triggers include requests to "set a goal", "help me achieve", "create a plan", "why am I not making progress", or similar goal-setting and achievement queries.
21app-store-scraper
>
19local-ai-models
Comprehensive guide for implementing on-device AI models on iOS using Foundation Models and MLX Swift frameworks. Use WHEN building iOS apps with (1) Local LLM inference, (2) Vision Language Models (VLMs), (3) Text embeddings, (4) Image generation, (5) Tool/function calling, (6) Multi-turn conversations, (7) Custom model integration, or (8) Structured generation.
17web-design
WHEN refining UI layout, typography, color, or polish; NOT code implementation; provides concise principles for intentional, legible design.
17eyes
WHEN users express dissatisfaction with visual appearance or behavior; use Playwright MCP to capture screenshots and collaborate on UI fixes with a structured feedback loop.
13react-testing
WHEN testing React components/hooks/context with React Testing Library; NOT e2e; covers renderHook, providers, forms, and anti-patterns.
12