roadmap-presentation

Installation
SKILL.md

Roadmap Presentation Skill

Build roadmaps that tell a strategy story — not just a list of features with dates. Every roadmap output is audience-calibrated: executives get outcomes, teams get specificity, customers get value.

Required Inputs

Ask the user for these if not provided:

  • Audience (executive/board, cross-functional, engineering, customers — changes format significantly)
  • Prioritised initiative list with rough timelines or quarters
  • Company OKRs or strategic goals (to anchor the narrative)
  • Period covered (Q1, H1, full year, etc.)

Audience Calibration

Always ask who the audience is before building:

Audience They care about Format
Executive / Board Business outcomes, revenue, risk, strategic alignment Outcome-led, 3 columns (Now / Next / Later), no sprint detail
Cross-functional stakeholders Dependencies, timelines, their team's involvement Theme-based, with dependency callouts
Engineering team Specificity, sequencing, technical constraints Detailed, with epics and rough sizing
Customers / External Value delivered, no internal detail Benefits-focused, no dates — "Coming soon / In progress / Done"

The Now / Next / Later Framework

Standard output structure:

NOW (Current quarter — high confidence, committed)

  • What we're building and why
  • Expected outcomes

NEXT (Following quarter — medium confidence, directional)

  • Themes and initiatives
  • Key hypotheses being tested

LATER (6–12 months — low confidence, aspirational)

  • Strategic bets
  • Dependencies that need to resolve first

⚠️ Never put specific dates on "Later" items. Use quarters or halves.


Roadmap Narrative Template

Every roadmap needs a narrative, not just a timeline. Structure it as:

  1. Where we are — current product state and key metrics
  2. The problem we're solving — what's holding customers or the business back
  3. Our strategic bets — the themes that guide this roadmap
  4. What we're building — Now / Next / Later breakdown
  5. How we'll know it's working — success metrics per theme
  6. What we're not doing — explicit deprioritisation with rationale

Output Format

Product Roadmap — [Product Area] — [Quarter/Year]

Audience: [Executive / Team / Customer] Roadmap Owner: [PM Name] Last Updated: [Date] Confidence Level: Now = High | Next = Medium | Later = Low


Strategic Context:

[2–3 sentences: what company/product goal does this roadmap serve?]

Guiding Themes This Period:

  1. [Theme 1] — [1-line rationale]
  2. [Theme 2] — [1-line rationale]
  3. [Theme 3] — [1-line rationale]

NOW — [Quarter]

Theme Initiative Outcome Expected Team Status
[Theme] [What we're building] [Metric it moves] [Owner] In Progress / Starting

NEXT — [Quarter]

Theme Initiative Hypothesis Dependencies
[Theme] [What we plan to build] [If we build X, we expect Y] [What needs to be true first]

LATER — [H2 / Next Year]

Theme Strategic Bet Why Later
[Theme] [What we might build] [What's blocking or uncertain]

What We're NOT Building (and Why):

  • [Requested initiative] — Deprioritised because: [reason]
  • [Requested initiative] — Deprioritised because: [reason]

Success Metrics for This Roadmap:

Metric Now Target End of Year Target
[Metric] [X] [Y]

Guidelines

  • Never let a roadmap become a commitment list — frame everything outside "Now" as directional
  • Always include a "not doing" section — it prevents the roadmap from becoming a wish list in disguise
  • For executive audiences: lead with the outcome the roadmap delivers to the business, not the features
  • Recommend a roadmap review cadence: monthly for Now items, quarterly for Next/Later
  • If dates are demanded for Later items: use quarters (Q3 2026), not specific dates

Quality Checks

  • Format matches the audience (executives don't get sprint-level detail)
  • NOW items are committed with owners; NEXT items are directional; LATER items are aspirational
  • "What We're NOT Building" section has at least 2 items with rationale
  • Success metrics are specified per theme (not just a list of features)
  • Language is free of internal jargon — tested by asking: "could an external stakeholder understand this?"
Related skills

More from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

Installs
11
GitHub Stars
307
First Seen
Apr 3, 2026