multi-perspective-ideation
Multi-Perspective Ideation
Generate ideas through 8 expert personas, cross-pollinate them, evaluate systematically, and deep-dive into the most promising ones.
Workflow
digraph ideation {
"Phase 0: Setup" -> "Phase 1: Diverge";
"Phase 1: Diverge" -> "Phase 2: Cross-Pollinate";
"Phase 2: Cross-Pollinate" -> "Phase 3: Evaluate";
"Phase 3: Evaluate" -> "Phase 4: Deep Dive";
"Phase 2: Cross-Pollinate" -> "Phase 3: Evaluate" [style=dashed, label="skip ok"];
"Phase 1: Diverge" -> "Phase 3: Evaluate" [style=dashed, label="skip ok"];
}
Each phase can be skipped if the user requests it. Always confirm before proceeding to the next phase.
Phase 0: Setup
- Confirm the theme (what to ideate about)
- Ask 1-2 questions about context and constraints (target audience, budget, timeline, domain, etc.) — keep it brief
- Confirm personas: default 8 experts, or ask if the user wants to add/replace any
- Default 8: Creative Expert, Technical Expert, Business Expert, Academic Researcher, Social Scientist, Disruptor, Humorist, Adventurer
- For custom personas, see
references/personas.mdfor creation guidelines
Output language: Match the user's input language.
Phase 1: Diverge
Each expert generates 2-3 ideas (total 16-24 ideas).
Output format per expert:
### 🎨 Creative Expert (or relevant emoji per persona)
1. **[Idea Name]** — [1-2 sentence description]
💡 Why this persona suggests it: [1 sentence reasoning]
2. **[Idea Name]** — [1-2 sentence description]
💡 Why this persona suggests it: [1 sentence reasoning]
Persona detail: Read references/personas.md for each persona's thinking style, lens, and typical angles. Use these to ensure ideas genuinely differ across personas — not generic ideas with different labels.
Quality gate: Each idea must be specific and actionable, not abstract platitudes. "Use AI" is bad. "Build an AI that analyzes customer complaints to auto-generate product improvement tickets" is good.
After output, ask the user: "Phase 2(融合)に進みますか? それともこの中から気になるアイデアはありますか?"
Phase 2: Cross-Pollinate
Combine ideas from different personas to create 5-8 hybrid ideas.
Output format:
### Hybrid Ideas
1. **[Hybrid Idea Name]**
- 🔀 Source: [Persona A] "#[idea number]" × [Persona B] "#[idea number]"
- 💡 Fusion insight: [What combining these two perspectives reveals]
- 📝 Description: [2-3 sentences]
2. ...
Selection criteria for combinations:
- Prioritize unexpected pairings (e.g., Humorist × Academic, Disruptor × Business)
- Each hybrid must produce something neither source idea alone would suggest
- Avoid trivial merges ("just do both")
After output, ask the user: "Phase 3(評価)に進みますか? 評価軸をカスタマイズしたい場合はお知らせください。"
Phase 3: Evaluate
Score all ideas (Phase 1 + Phase 2) on a matrix.
Default evaluation axes (1-5 scale):
| Axis | 1 | 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility (実現可能性) | Requires breakthrough tech / massive investment | Can start tomorrow with existing resources |
| Impact (インパクト) | Marginal improvement | Game-changing potential |
| Novelty (新規性) | Already commonly done | No one has tried this |
| Cost Efficiency (コスト効率) | Extremely expensive | Very low cost relative to value |
If the user specified custom axes in Phase 0 or here, use those instead.
Output format:
## Evaluation Matrix
| # | Idea | Source | Feas. | Impact | Novel | Cost Eff. | Total |
|---|------|--------|-------|--------|-------|-----------|-------|
| 1 | [name] | Creative #1 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 16 |
| 2 | [name] | Hybrid #3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 15 |
| ... |
### 🏆 Top Ideas
1. **[#1 Idea Name]** (Total: XX) — [1 sentence on why it ranks high]
2. **[#2 Idea Name]** (Total: XX) — [1 sentence]
3. **[#3 Idea Name]** (Total: XX) — [1 sentence]
Sort by total score descending. Highlight top 3-5 as "注目アイデア".
After output, ask: "どのアイデアを深掘りしますか? 番号で1〜3個選んでください。"
Phase 4: Deep Dive
For each selected idea (1-3), produce a structured mini-proposal:
## Deep Dive: [Idea Name]
### Overview
[1 paragraph description — what it is and why it matters]
### Target
[Who benefits and why they care]
### Implementation Steps
1. [Concrete step 1]
2. [Concrete step 2]
3. [Concrete step 3]
(3-5 steps)
### Risks & Mitigations
| Risk | Mitigation |
|------|-----------|
| [risk 1] | [mitigation] |
| [risk 2] | [mitigation] |
### Success Metrics
- [Metric 1]: [Target]
- [Metric 2]: [Target]
### First Action
🚀 [The one thing to do tomorrow to start moving]
After output, ask: "他にも深掘りしたいアイデアはありますか? または最初のテーマで追加のアイデア出しをしますか?"
Quick Reference
| Phase | Input | Output | Skip? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 Setup | Theme + context | Confirmed scope & personas | No |
| 1 Diverge | Theme | 16-24 ideas (8 personas × 2-3) | No |
| 2 Cross-Pollinate | Phase 1 ideas | 5-8 hybrid ideas | Yes |
| 3 Evaluate | All ideas | Scored matrix + top 3-5 | Yes |
| 4 Deep Dive | User picks 1-3 | Mini-proposals with action plans | Yes |