Specification First

Overview

Author the specification before the implementation. The specification is the source of truth. Code is generated to satisfy the specification, never the reverse.

Core principle: A behavior specification defines WHAT the system does. Code implements HOW. Without a specification, you are guessing.

No exceptions. No workarounds. No shortcuts.

The Prime Directive

NO IMPLEMENTATION WITHOUT A SPECIFICATION FIRST

If you have not produced a specification defining inputs, outputs, edge cases, and acceptance criteria, you are not authorized to write code. This is not optional. This is not excessive. This prevents the leading cause of AI-generated code failures: building the wrong thing.

When to Use

Mandatory when:

• Developing a new feature or module
• Creating an API endpoint
• Constructing a data pipeline
• Building any system with defined inputs and outputs
• The user says "build me X" or "create Y"

Exceptions (confirm with the human):

• Configuration changes
• Single-line defect fixes with unambiguous behavior
• Documentation updates

The Entry Protocol

BEFORE writing any implementation code:

1. IDENTIFY: What are the inputs?
2. DEFINE: What are the expected outputs?
3. CONSTRAIN: What are the boundaries and limitations?
4. EDGE: What happens at the edges? (empty, null, maximum, concurrent)
5. ACCEPT: What criteria demonstrate correctness?
6. WRITE: Produce the specification document
7. APPROVE: Obtain user confirmation
8. ONLY THEN: Implement

Omit any step = building the wrong thing

Specification Document Template

# [Feature Name] Specification

## Purpose
[Single sentence: what this does and why it exists]

## Inputs
| Input | Type | Required | Constraints | Default |
|-------|------|----------|-------------|---------|
| [name] | [type] | [yes/no] | [validation rules] | [default] |

## Outputs
| Scenario | Output | Shape |
|----------|--------|-------|
| Success | [what is returned] | [type/structure] |
| Invalid input | [error response] | [error shape] |
| Not found | [404 response] | [error shape] |

## Behavior

### Standard Path
1. [Step-by-step behavior for normal usage]
2. [Include state mutations, side effects]

### Edge Cases
| Case | Input | Expected Behavior |
|------|-------|-------------------|
| Empty input | "" | Return validation error |
| Maximum length | 10000 chars | Truncate to 5000 |
| Concurrent access | 2 simultaneous requests | Serialize second request |
| [case] | [input] | [behavior] |

## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] [Criterion 1 - testable, specific]
- [ ] [Criterion 2 - testable, specific]
- [ ] [Criterion 3 - testable, specific]

## Explicitly Excluded (YAGNI)
- [Feature intentionally omitted]
- [Optimization intentionally deferred]

Relationship with Test-First Development

digraph spec_test_flow {
    rankdir=LR;
    spec [label="Author Spec\n(this skill)", shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightyellow];
    test [label="Write Failing Test\nfrom Spec Criteria", shape=box style=filled fillcolor="#ffcccc"];
    code [label="Write Minimal Code\nto Pass Test", shape=box style=filled fillcolor="#ccffcc"];
    verify [label="Verify Against\nSpec Criteria", shape=box style=filled fillcolor="#ccccff"];

    spec -> test [label="acceptance criteria\nbecome test cases"];
    test -> code [label="test-first cycle"];
    code -> verify [label="all criteria satisfied?"];
    verify -> spec [label="no - revise spec\nor implementation"];
}

Specification -> Tests -> Code -> Verify against Specification

The specification's acceptance criteria map directly to test cases. Each criterion generates at least one test. If you cannot derive a test from a criterion, the criterion is too vague -- refine the specification.

Specification Depth Levels

Level	When Appropriate	Scope
Minimal	Simple feature, obvious behavior	Purpose + Inputs + Outputs + 3 acceptance criteria
Standard	Most features	Full template above
Exhaustive	Complex systems, public APIs, multi-tenant	Full template + sequence diagrams + state machines + error taxonomy

Scale the specification to the complexity. A utility function warrants a minimal spec. An authentication system demands an exhaustive one.

Cognitive Traps

Rationalization	Truth
"It is too simple to specify"	Simple features harbor hidden edge cases. A specification takes 2 minutes.
"I will figure it out while coding"	You will build the wrong thing and refactor three times.
"The user already described what they want"	Users describe goals, not behavior. The specification bridges that gap.
"Test-first is sufficient; I do not need a spec"	Test-first tells you WHAT to verify. The specification tells you WHAT to build. Both are necessary.
"Specifications slow me down"	Specifications prevent building the wrong thing. That is faster in every measurable way.
"I will write the spec afterward"	Specifications written after implementation rationalize what was built, not what should have been built.
"AI understands my intent"	AI produces plausible code that may diverge from intent. The specification eliminates ambiguity.

Guardrails

Prohibited actions:

• Starting implementation before specification approval
• Writing tests without referencing specification criteria
• Changing behavior without updating the specification
• Shipping without verifying against acceptance criteria
• Deferring edge cases ("we will handle those later")
• Writing a specification after implementation is complete

Required actions:

• Obtain specification approval before writing code
• Map acceptance criteria to test cases one-to-one
• Update the specification when requirements evolve
• Verify all criteria pass before declaring completion
• Include explicitly excluded features (what you are NOT building)

Integration

Workflow sequence:

• godmode:intent-discovery -> produces design
• godmode:specification-first -> produces specification from design
• godmode:task-planning -> produces implementation plan from specification
• godmode:test-first -> produces tests from specification criteria
• godmode:completion-gate -> verifies against specification criteria

REQUIRED COMPANION SKILL: Invoke godmode:test-first when implementing