Product Vision & Steering

Role

You produce the three steering documents that every downstream spec, backlog item, and implementation relies on for context. These are the project's long-lived "constitution" — they change rarely and intentionally.

You are invoked by the ol-sdd-workflow orchestrator at Phase 0, or directly by the user when steering needs to be set up or refreshed.

Deliverables

File	Template	Purpose
documentation/steering/product.md	prompts/coding/templates/product-template.md	Product vision: purpose, users, key features, objectives, metrics, principles
documentation/steering/tech.md	prompts/coding/templates/tech-template.md	Technology stack: languages, frameworks, libraries, tooling, deployment
documentation/steering/structure.md	prompts/coding/templates/structure-template.md	Project structure: directory organisation, naming conventions, module boundaries

Each file is also published as a Confluence page under the project's parent page.

Workflow

Step 1 — Detect Existing State

Check for:

• documentation/steering/ directory and each of the three files
• If any exist, read them and treat them as the baseline to refine (not replace)
• Identify codebase type from manifest files: package.json, pyproject.toml, requirements.txt, go.mod, Cargo.toml, Pipfile, etc.

Step 2 — Analyse the Project

Scan the codebase for:

• Primary language(s) and version
• Frameworks and major dependencies
• Directory structure and apparent architectural style
• Naming conventions (snake_case vs PascalCase vs camelCase)
• Testing framework and layout
• CI/CD configuration

Do not fabricate details you can't verify — flag unknowns for the user.

Step 3 — Gather Product Context

Ask the user (skip questions you can answer from an existing README or docs):

• What problem does this product solve?
• Who are the primary users / consumers?
• What are the top 3–5 features that deliver value?
• What are the business or project objectives?
• What does success look like in 6 months? (metrics, milestones)
• Any known principles, constraints, or non-negotiables?

Step 4 — Fill the Three Templates

Populate each template. Keep it concrete and specific to this project — no boilerplate filler.

For tech.md, draw from software-architect/references/technology-stack.md if the project is on the bclearer/OL stack. Otherwise document the actual stack.

For structure.md, document what is there now (not an aspirational rewrite). If the structure has known problems, note them in a dedicated section but don't change it.

Step 5 — Present for Approval

Present all three filled documents to the user. Ask for approval per document — it's acceptable to approve them together, but give the user the chance to refine each.

Step 6 — Commit and Publish

On approval:

1. Write the three files to documentation/steering/
2. Publish each as a Confluence page under the project's parent page (use Atlassian MCP tools; ask for space key and parent page ID if not configured)
3. Update documentation/workflow-config.md with confluence/jira config if provided
4. Return to the caller (orchestrator or user) with links to committed files and Confluence pages

---

When to Refresh Steering

Steering docs should be stable. Refresh when:

• The product pivots (new users, new primary problem)
• The tech stack changes materially (new primary language, new framework)
• The project structure is deliberately reorganised
• Onboarding a new team member reveals that current steering is misleading

Minor drift (a new library added, a refactor) does not warrant a steering refresh — handle it in feature specs.

What This Skill Does NOT Do

• Does not design features (that's feature-spec-author)
• Does not make architecture decisions at feature-level (that's software-architect)
• Does not produce ontology models (that's ontologist / ob-ontologist)
• Does not define a phased development roadmap — that belongs in the project's Confluence landing page or as a follow-up to steering

References

• prompts/coding/templates/product-template.md — product vision template
• prompts/coding/templates/tech-template.md — technology stack template
• prompts/coding/templates/structure-template.md — project structure template
• skills/software-architect/references/technology-stack.md — bclearer/OL platform libraries reference
• skills/software-architect/references/confluence-pages.md — Confluence page conventions

---

Feedback

If the user corrects this skill's output due to a misinterpretation or missing rule in the skill itself (not a one-off preference), invoke skill-feedback to capture structured feedback and optionally post a GitHub issue.

If skill-feedback is not installed, ask the user: "This looks like a skill defect. Would you like to install the skill-feedback skill to report it?" If the user declines, continue without feedback capture.