backend-scaffold
backend-scaffold
Generate production-ready backend code scaffolds from upstream specs — multi-stack, tech.md-adaptive.
Context Files
$JAAN_CONTEXT_DIR/tech.md- Tech stack context (CRITICAL — determines framework, DB, patterns)- Uses sections:
#current-stack,#frameworks,#constraints,#patterns
- Uses sections:
$JAAN_CONTEXT_DIR/config.md- Project configuration$JAAN_TEMPLATES_DIR/jaan-to-backend-scaffold.template.md- Output template$JAAN_LEARN_DIR/jaan-to-backend-scaffold.learn.md- Past lessons (loaded in Pre-Execution)${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/docs/extending/language-protocol.md- Language resolution protocol
Input
Upstream Artifacts: $ARGUMENTS
Accepts 1-3 file paths or descriptions:
- backend-api-contract — Path to OpenAPI YAML (from
/jaan-to:backend-api-contractoutput:api.yaml) - backend-task-breakdown — Path to BE task breakdown markdown (from
/jaan-to:backend-task-breakdownoutput) - backend-data-model — Path to data model markdown (from
/jaan-to:backend-data-modeloutput) - Empty — Interactive wizard prompting for each
Pre-Execution Protocol
MANDATORY — Read and execute ALL steps in: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/docs/extending/pre-execution-protocol.md
Skill name: backend-scaffold
Execute: Step 0 (Init Guard) → A (Load Lessons) → B (Resolve Template) → C (Offer Template Seeding)
Also read context files if available:
$JAAN_CONTEXT_DIR/tech.md— Know the tech stack for framework-specific code generation$JAAN_CONTEXT_DIR/config.md— Project configuration
Language Settings
Read and apply language protocol: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/docs/extending/language-protocol.md
Override field for this skill: language_backend-scaffold
Language exception: Generated code output (variable names, code blocks, schemas, SQL, API specs) is NOT affected by this setting and remains in the project's programming language.
PHASE 1: Analysis (Read-Only)
Thinking Mode
ultrathink
Use extended reasoning for:
- Analyzing upstream artifacts to derive code structure
- Mapping API contract schemas to framework-native patterns
- Planning multi-stack generation strategy
- Identifying edge cases in input parsing
Step 1: Validate & Parse Inputs
For each provided path:
- backend-api-contract: Read api.yaml, extract paths, schemas, error responses, security schemes
- backend-task-breakdown: Read markdown, extract task list, entity names, reliability patterns
- backend-data-model: Read markdown, extract table definitions, constraints, indexes, relations
- Report which inputs found vs missing; suggest fallback for missing (e.g., CRUD from backend-data-model if no API contract)
Present input summary:
INPUT SUMMARY
─────────────
Sources Found: {list}
Sources Missing: {list with fallback suggestions}
Entities: {extracted entity names}
Endpoints: {count from API contract}
Tables: {count from data model}
Tasks: {count from task breakdown}
Step 2: Detect Tech Stack
Read $JAAN_CONTEXT_DIR/tech.md:
- Extract framework from
#current-stack(default: Fastify v5+) - Extract DB from
#current-stack(default: PostgreSQL) - Extract patterns from
#patterns(auth, error handling, logging) - If tech.md missing: ask framework/DB via AskUserQuestion
Step 3: Clarify Architecture
AskUserQuestion for items not in tech.md:
- Project structure (monolith / modular monolith / microservice)
- Auth middleware pattern (JWT / API key / session / none)
- Error handling depth (basic / full RFC 9457 with error taxonomy)
- Logging (structured JSON pino / winston / none)
Step 4: Plan Scaffold Structure
Present directory tree, file list, resource count:
SCAFFOLD PLAN
═════════════
STACK: {framework} + {database} + {orm}
PROJECT STRUCTURE
─────────────────
{directory tree showing all files to generate}
FILES ({count} total)
─────────────────────
{numbered list with file purpose}
RESOURCES ({count})
───────────────────
{resource list with operations}
HARD STOP — Review Scaffold Plan
Use AskUserQuestion:
- Question: "Proceed with generating the scaffold?"
- Header: "Generate"
- Options:
- "Yes" — Generate the scaffold code
- "No" — Cancel
- "Edit" — Let me revise the scope or architecture first
Do NOT proceed to Phase 2 without explicit approval.
PHASE 2: Generation (Write Phase)
Phase 2 Output — Flat folder (no nested subfolder)
All files in $JAAN_OUTPUTS_DIR/backend/scaffold/{id}-{slug}/:
{id}-{slug}/
├── {id}-{slug}.md # Main doc (setup guide + architecture)
├── {id}-{slug}-routes.ts # Route handlers (all resources)
├── {id}-{slug}-services.ts # Service layer (business logic)
├── {id}-{slug}-schemas.ts # Validation schemas
├── {id}-{slug}-middleware.ts # Auth + error handling middleware
├── {id}-{slug}-prisma.prisma # ORM data model
├── {id}-{slug}-config.ts # Package.json + tsconfig content
└── {id}-{slug}-readme.md # Setup + run instructions
File extensions adapt to detected stack (.ts for Node.js, .php for PHP, .go for Go).
Step 6: Generate Content
Read $JAAN_TEMPLATES_DIR/jaan-to-backend-scaffold.template.md and populate all sections based on Phase 1 analysis.
If tech stack needed, extract sections from tech.md:
- Current Stack:
#current-stack - Frameworks:
#frameworks - Constraints:
#constraints - Patterns:
#patterns
Step 7: Quality Check
Validate generated output against checklist:
- All API endpoints from contract have route handlers
- All entities from data model have ORM models
- Validation schemas generated for all request bodies
- Error handler covers validation, ORM, and generic errors
- Service layer stubs exist for all business logic
- DB singleton + graceful disconnect configured
- No anti-patterns present in generated code
If any check fails, fix before preview.
Step 8: Preview & Approval
Present generated output summary. Use AskUserQuestion:
- Question: "Write scaffold files to output?"
- Header: "Write Files"
- Options:
- "Yes" — Write the files
- "No" — Cancel
- "Refine" — Make adjustments first
Step 9: Generate ID and Folder Structure
source "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/id-generator.sh"
SUBDOMAIN_DIR="$JAAN_OUTPUTS_DIR/backend/scaffold"
mkdir -p "$SUBDOMAIN_DIR"
NEXT_ID=$(generate_next_id "$SUBDOMAIN_DIR")
slug="{project-name-slug}"
OUTPUT_FOLDER="${SUBDOMAIN_DIR}/${NEXT_ID}-${slug}"
Preview output configuration:
Output Configuration
- ID: {NEXT_ID}
- Folder:
$JAAN_OUTPUTS_DIR/backend/scaffold/{NEXT_ID}-{slug}/- Main file:
{NEXT_ID}-{slug}.md
Step 10: Write Output
- Create output folder:
mkdir -p "$OUTPUT_FOLDER" - Write all scaffold files to
$OUTPUT_FOLDER - Update subdomain index:
source "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/lib/index-updater.sh"
add_to_index \
"$SUBDOMAIN_DIR/README.md" \
"$NEXT_ID" \
"${NEXT_ID}-${slug}" \
"{Project Title}" \
"{Executive summary — 1-2 sentences}"
- Confirm completion:
Scaffold written to:
$JAAN_OUTPUTS_DIR/backend/scaffold/{NEXT_ID}-{slug}/Index updated:$JAAN_OUTPUTS_DIR/backend/scaffold/README.md
Step 11: Suggest Next Actions
Scaffold generated successfully!
Next Steps:
- Copy scaffold files to your project directory
- Run
npm install(or equivalent) to install dependencies- Run
/jaan-to:dev-integration-planto plan integration with existing code- Run
/jaan-to:dev-test-planto generate test plan
Step 12: Capture Feedback
Use AskUserQuestion:
- Question: "How did the scaffold turn out?"
- Header: "Feedback"
- Options:
- "Perfect!" — Done
- "Needs fixes" — What should I improve?
- "Learn from this" — Capture a lesson for future runs
If "Learn from this": Run /jaan-to:learn-add backend-scaffold "{feedback}"
Key Generation Rules — Node.js/TypeScript (Research-Informed)
- Routing: Use
@fastify/autoloadv6 for file-based route loading — register twice (plugins withencapsulate: false, routes encapsulated per resource); addignorePattern: /.*\.(?:schema|service)\.ts/to prevent non-plugin files from being auto-loaded as routes - Type Provider: Use
fastify-type-provider-zodv6.1+ withvalidatorCompiler/serializerCompilerset once at app level; must callwithTypeProvider<ZodTypeProvider>()on each encapsulated context (type providers don't propagate across encapsulation boundaries) - Prisma Singleton: Use
globalThispattern to prevent connection pool exhaustion during hot-reload; conditional assignment based onNODE_ENV - Zod Schemas: Define schemas in
.schema.tsfiles, exportz.infer<>types; derive from OpenAPI contract component schemas - Error Handler: Use Fastify's
setErrorHandler(NOT Express-style middleware) — usehasZodFastifySchemaValidationErrors(error)for 400 (NOTinstanceof ZodErrorwhich fails across module boundaries), useisResponseSerializationError(error)for 500 serialization errors; mapPrismaClientKnownRequestErrorP2002 → 409 (unique constraint), P2003 → 409 (foreign key), P2025 → 404 (not found), all others → 500; always setContent-Type: application/problem+json - RFC 9457 Fields:
type(URI),title,status,detail,instance; extensionerrors[]for validation details - Service Layer: Plain exported functions importing the Prisma singleton — module caching acts as built-in singleton, making DI containers (tsyringe, inversify) unnecessary; testable via
vi.mock(); callable from CRON jobs or queue consumers outside HTTP context; use Prisma$transactionfor cross-service operations - Route Structure: Collocated
index.ts(routes) +{resource}.schema.ts(Zod) +{resource}.service.ts(logic) per resource - TypeScript: Extend
fastify-tsconfigv2 withtarget: "ES2023",module: "NodeNext",strict: true - Import Extensions: With
"type": "module"andmoduleResolution: "NodeNext", all imports MUST include.jsextensions —NodeNextmirrors Node.js runtime behavior; never usemoduleResolution: "bundler"for backends (allows vague imports that fail at runtime) - Env Vars: Parameterize
DATABASE_URL,PORT,HOST,NODE_ENV,LOG_LEVEL,CORS_ORIGIN - Env Validation: Validate environment variables with Zod at startup — crash immediately on missing/invalid variables; use Node.js 20.6+
--env-file=.envflag for loading - Scripts:
dev(tsx watch),build(tsc),start,lint,test,db:generate,db:migrate:dev,db:migrate:deploy,db:push,db:seed,db:studio,postinstall(prisma generate)
Multi-Stack Support (Research-Informed)
The skill reads tech.md #current-stack to determine which stack to generate:
| tech.md value | Framework | ORM/DB | Validation | Output |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Node.js / TypeScript | Fastify v5+ | Prisma | Zod + type-provider v6.1 | .ts files |
| PHP | Laravel 12 / Symfony 7 | Eloquent / Doctrine | Form Requests / Symfony Validator | .php files |
| Go | Chi / stdlib (Go 1.22+) | sqlc / GORM | go-playground/validator | .go files |
PHP Stack (Laravel) — Key Patterns:
- PSR-4 autoloading, single
public/index.phpentry point - Route model binding + Form Requests for validation (
$request->validated(), never$request->all()) - Eloquent Active Record with
utf8mb4, BIGINT PKs, JSON columns - Strictness in
AppServiceProvider::boot():preventLazyLoading()(catches N+1),preventSilentlyDiscardingAttributes()(catches mass assignment typos),preventAccessingMissingAttributes(); in production, lazy loading violations log instead of throwing - API Resources for response shaping (never expose raw models); use
whenLoaded(),whenCounted(), conditionalwhen()helpers - Sanctum for auth (SPA cookies + API tokens); cookie auth requires
SANCTUM_STATEFUL_DOMAINSandsupports_credentials: true - Pest 3/4 for testing with architecture presets (
arch()->preset()->laravel()) and mutation testing (--mutate) - RFC 9457 via
crell/api-problemv3.8.0 (PHP ^8.3) - Zero-downtime MySQL migrations: expand-contract pattern (add nullable → backfill → deploy → drop old); use
daursu/laravel-zero-downtime-migrationfor large tables
PHP Stack (Symfony) — Key Patterns:
- API Platform v4.x:
#[ApiResource]annotations for automatic CRUD REST APIs with OpenAPI documentation - Doctrine Data Mapper ORM: entities are POPOs, persistence via EntityManager (better separation than Active Record)
- DTOs with
#[MapRequestPayload]and Symfony Validator constraint attributes (#[Assert\NotBlank],#[Assert\Positive]) - JWT via
lexik/jwt-authentication-bundlev3.2.0 with RS256 signing +gesdinet/jwt-refresh-token-bundlefor refresh tokens
Go Stack — Generation Rules:
- Routing: Go 1.22+
net/http.ServeMuxwith method+wildcard patterns (GET /users/{id},r.PathValue("id")); use Chi v5.2.x only for middleware grouping/subrouters; avoid gorilla/mux (archived 2023), Gin/Fiber (diverge fromnet/httpidioms) - Structure: Feature-based
internal/packages (internal/user/handler.go,service.go,repository.go); avoid layer-basedinternal/handlers/anti-pattern (excessive cross-package imports); shallow hierarchies (1-2 levels) - DI: Constructor injection with small interfaces (1-3 methods) defined at consumer site; accept interfaces, return structs; wire manually in
main.go; manual DI preferred over Wire/Dig except for very large projects - Database: sqlc generates type-safe Go code from annotated SQL queries (
-- name: GetUser :one); golang-migrate for sequential numbered up/down migration files - Validation: go-playground/validator v10 (v10.27.0) with struct tags (
validate:"required,email"); single instance (caches struct info);WithRequiredStructEnabled()for v11 compatibility;RegisterTagNameFunc()for JSON field names - OpenAPI: oapi-codegen v2 generates Go types, server interfaces, and request validation middleware; developers implement
ServerInterface; YAML config with Chi/stdlib backend support - Error Handling: RFC 9457 via custom
ProblemDetailstruct;Content-Type: application/problem+json - Testing: Table-driven tests with
httptest.NewRecorder()+httptest.NewRequest();t.Run()subtests;t.Parallel()for concurrent execution - Docker: Multi-stage builds → 10-20MB images using
distroless/static-debian12;CGO_ENABLED=0for static binaries;-ldflags="-s -w"to strip debug info - Graceful Shutdown:
signal.NotifyContextwith 10-second timeout, closing HTTP server and database connections
WebSocket Support (Optional — all stacks):
- Go: coder/websocket, Hub pattern for connection management
- Node.js: ws / Socket.IO
- PHP: Ratchet / Swoole
- Auth: ephemeral single-use token via query parameter (
ws://host/ws?ticket=abc123); 30-second TTL, consumed on first use to prevent log-exposure attacks - SSE handles 95% of real-time use cases — suggest SSE first; SSE works over standard HTTP, supports auto-reconnection, multiplexed over HTTP/2
Test Framework & Mutation Tool Recommendations
When generating scaffold, include test framework and mutation tool recommendations based on detected stack:
| Stack | Test Framework | Mutation Tool | Config File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Node.js/TS | Vitest | StrykerJS | stryker.config.mjs |
| PHP/Laravel | Pest | Infection | infection.json5 |
| Go | testing + testify | go-mutesting | CLI flags |
| Python | pytest | mutmut | setup.cfg |
Add to generated README: "Run /jaan-to:qa-test-mutate to validate test suite effectiveness."
Anti-Patterns to NEVER Generate
All Stacks: Business logic in route handlers, hardcoded secrets, missing .gitignore, no error handling
Node.js: Direct Prisma calls in handlers, multiple PrismaClient instances, any types, Express-style error middleware, missing response serialization schemas, instanceof ZodError (use v6 helpers), missing .js extensions in ESM imports, moduleResolution: "bundler" for backends
PHP: Fat controllers, N+1 queries, exposing raw Eloquent models, env() outside config files, utf8 instead of utf8mb4, missing Eloquent strictness modes
Go: Generic package names (utils/), global database connections, ignoring errors, unlimited connection pool, goroutine leaks, layer-based internal/handlers/ structure
Package Dependencies (Research-Validated)
Node.js/TypeScript:
- Production:
fastify^5.7,@fastify/autoload^6,@fastify/cors^10,@fastify/sensible^6,@fastify/swagger^9,@fastify/swagger-ui^5,@prisma/client^6,fastify-plugin^5,fastify-type-provider-zod^6.1,zod^3.24 - Dev:
typescript^5.6,@types/node^22,fastify-tsconfig^2,prisma^6,tsx^4,vitest^2,eslint^9
Go: chi v5.2.x (optional), go-playground/validator v10, golang-migrate, sqlc, oapi-codegen v2
PHP (Laravel): laravel/sanctum, crell/api-problem ^3.8, pestphp/pest ^3
PHP (Symfony): api-platform/core ^4, lexik/jwt-authentication-bundle ^3.2, gesdinet/jwt-refresh-token-bundle
Skill Alignment
- Two-phase workflow with HARD STOP for human approval
- Multi-stack support via
tech.mddetection - Template-driven output structure
- Output to standardized
$JAAN_OUTPUTS_DIRpath
Definition of Done
- All API endpoints from contract have route handlers
- All entities from data model have ORM models (Prisma/Eloquent/Doctrine/sqlc)
- Validation schemas generated for all request bodies
- Error handler covers validation errors, ORM errors, and generic errors
- Service layer stubs exist for all business logic
- DB singleton + graceful disconnect configured
- Setup README is complete and actionable
- Output follows v3.0.0 structure (ID, folder, index)
- Index updated with executive summary
- User approved final result