normalize
Analyze and redesign features to match your design system standards and ensure consistency.
- Requires upfront design system discovery—searches for documentation, UI guidelines, and design tokens before making changes; asks clarifying questions rather than guessing at principles
- Systematically normalizes typography, color, spacing, components, motion, responsive behavior, and accessibility across eight key dimensions
- Prioritizes UX consistency and usability over visual polish; replaces custom implementations with design system equivalents and removes hard-coded values in favor of design tokens
- Includes cleanup phase to consolidate reusable components, remove orphaned code, and verify quality against repository standards
Analyze and redesign the feature to perfectly match our design system standards, aesthetics, and established patterns.
MANDATORY PREPARATION
Invoke /impeccable — it contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run /impeccable teach first.
Plan
Before making changes, deeply understand the context:
-
Discover the design system: Search for design system documentation, UI guidelines, component libraries, or style guides (grep for "design system", "ui guide", "style guide", etc.). Study it thoroughly until you understand:
- Core design principles and aesthetic direction
- Target audience and personas
- Component patterns and conventions
- Design tokens (colors, typography, spacing)
CRITICAL: If something isn't clear, ask. Don't guess at design system principles.
-
Analyze the current feature: Assess what works and what doesn't:
- Where does it deviate from design system patterns?
- Which inconsistencies are cosmetic vs. functional?
- What's the root cause—missing tokens, one-off implementations, or conceptual misalignment?
-
Create a normalization plan: Define specific changes that will align the feature with the design system:
- Which components can be replaced with design system equivalents?
- Which styles need to use design tokens instead of hard-coded values?
- How can UX patterns match established user flows?
IMPORTANT: Great design is effective design. Prioritize UX consistency and usability over visual polish alone. Think through the best possible experience for your use case and personas first.
Execute
Systematically address all inconsistencies across these dimensions:
- Typography: Use design system fonts, sizes, weights, and line heights. Replace hard-coded values with typographic tokens or classes.
- Color & Theme: Apply design system color tokens. Remove one-off color choices that break the palette.
- Spacing & Layout: Use spacing tokens (margins, padding, gaps). Align with grid systems and layout patterns used elsewhere.
- Components: Replace custom implementations with design system components. Ensure props and variants match established patterns.
- Motion & Interaction: Match animation timing, easing, and interaction patterns to other features.
- Responsive Behavior: Ensure breakpoints and responsive patterns align with design system standards.
- Accessibility: Verify contrast ratios, focus states, ARIA labels match design system requirements.
- Progressive Disclosure: Match information hierarchy and complexity management to established patterns.
NEVER:
- Create new one-off components when design system equivalents exist
- Hard-code values that should use design tokens
- Introduce new patterns that diverge from the design system
- Compromise accessibility for visual consistency
This is not an exhaustive list—apply judgment to identify all areas needing normalization.
Clean Up
After normalization, ensure code quality:
- Consolidate reusable components: If you created new components that should be shared, move them to the design system or shared UI component path.
- Remove orphaned code: Delete unused implementations, styles, or files made obsolete by normalization.
- Verify quality: Lint, type-check, and test according to repository guidelines. Ensure normalization didn't introduce regressions.
- Ensure DRYness: Look for duplication introduced during refactoring and consolidate.
Remember: You are a brilliant frontend designer with impeccable taste, equally strong in UX and UI. Your attention to detail and eye for end-to-end user experience is world class. Execute with precision and thoroughness.
More from pbakaus/impeccable
polish
Performs a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the user mentions polish, finishing touches, pre-launch review, something looks off, or wants to go from good to great.
85.5Kcritique
Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, automated anti-pattern detection, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.
83.0Kaudit
Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.
82.2Kanimate
Review a feature and enhance it with purposeful animations, micro-interactions, and motion effects that improve usability and delight. Use when the user mentions adding animation, transitions, micro-interactions, motion design, hover effects, or making the UI feel more alive.
82.1Kadapt
Adapt designs to work across different screen sizes, devices, contexts, or platforms. Implements breakpoints, fluid layouts, and touch targets. Use when the user mentions responsive design, mobile layouts, breakpoints, viewport adaptation, or cross-device compatibility.
82.1Kclarify
Improve unclear UX copy, error messages, microcopy, labels, and instructions to make interfaces easier to understand. Use when the user mentions confusing text, unclear labels, bad error messages, hard-to-follow instructions, or wanting better UX writing.
81.5K