skills/peterhdd/agent-skills/project-manager-senior

project-manager-senior

SKILL.md

Project Task Breakdown Guide

Convert project specifications into actionable, developer-ready task breakdowns with realistic scope, measurable acceptance criteria, and strict adherence to stated requirements.

Process

1. Analyze the Specification

  • Locate the canonical spec (check repo root, docs/, or project config).
  • Quote exact requirement text when creating tasks -- do not paraphrase into something broader.
  • List every ambiguity, gap, or contradiction found. Each one becomes a "Clarification Needed" item with a proposed default and a stakeholder question.
  • Extract the technical stack, constraints, and integration points.

2. Break Down Tasks

  • Group tasks by feature area, ordered by dependency (foundations first, integrations last).
  • Each task gets: description, estimated hours with confidence qualifier, acceptance criteria, files affected, and spec reference.
  • Estimates use three levels: "high confidence" (well-understood work), "medium confidence" (some unknowns), "low confidence" (significant unknowns requiring spike/research).
  • Include a setup task (Task 0) covering project scaffolding, environment, and dev tooling.
  • Every task must be completable in one focused session (2-8 hours). If a task exceeds 8 hours, split it into subtasks that each independently produce a testable result.

3. Write the Task Document

  • Save to tasks/<project-slug>-tasklist.md in the repository.
  • Include a specification summary at the top with quoted requirements.
  • End with a quality checklist and any clarification items.

4. Review Against Spec

  • Walk through the specification line by line and confirm every stated requirement maps to at least one task.
  • Confirm no task introduces requirements not present in the specification.
  • Verify the dependency ordering: no task references work from a later task.

Decision Rules

  • Ambiguous requirement: Document the ambiguity, state the assumed interpretation, and add a "Clarification Needed" flag. Do not block other tasks -- build against the assumption but mark it.
  • Task too large (>8 hours): Split into subtasks. Each subtask must independently produce a testable result.
  • Missing technical detail in spec: Add a time-boxed spike task (max 2 hours) to investigate, with a clear deliverable (e.g., "decision document comparing options A and B").
  • Conflicting requirements: Flag both requirements with spec references, propose a resolution, and mark as blocked until stakeholder confirmation.
  • Scope creep: New ideas go into a separate "Future Enhancements" section, never into the task list. Scope is locked to the specification.

Guidelines

  • Extract only what the specification says. Do not invent "premium" or "luxury" features.
  • Acceptance criteria must be verifiable by a developer or automated test -- no subjective language like "looks good" or "feels responsive."
  • When a specification is ambiguous, list the assumptions explicitly and flag them for stakeholder review before creating dependent tasks.
  • Be specific: "Implement POST /api/auth/register returning 201 with a JWT" -- not "add auth functionality."
  • Quote the spec: every task references the exact spec text it fulfills.
  • Stay realistic: estimates include a confidence qualifier. Do not promise certainty on unfamiliar integrations.
  • A developer should read a task and start coding within 5 minutes, with no need to ask clarifying questions.

See Task Example for a full TaskFlow worked example with all 5 tasks.

Reference

Task Format

Each task should include:

  • Description: One sentence explaining what to build
  • Estimate: Hours + confidence qualifier (high / medium / low)
  • Acceptance Criteria: Conditions verifiable by running a command, calling an API, or checking a UI state
  • Files: List of files to create or modify
  • Spec Reference: Exact quoted text from the specification

Estimate Confidence Levels

Level Meaning Action
High confidence Well-understood work, clear requirements Proceed normally
Medium confidence Some unknowns, library integration Add buffer time, note risks
Low confidence Significant unknowns Add a spike task (max 2h) before the implementation task

Scripts

scripts/parse_requirements.py

Parse a requirements document (markdown or plain text) and extract structured information including numbered requirements, user stories (As a... I want... So that...), acceptance criteria (checkboxes, Given/When/Then), and dependencies. Outputs a structured Markdown summary.

scripts/parse_requirements.py docs/spec.md
scripts/parse_requirements.py requirements.md

scripts/estimate_tasks.py

Estimate effort for tasks based on complexity sizing. Takes a CSV or text file of tasks with complexity ratings (S/M/L/XL) and produces effort estimates with a Markdown table showing per-task estimates, total hours, complexity distribution, and recommended sprint allocation.

scripts/estimate_tasks.py tasks.csv
scripts/estimate_tasks.py backlog.txt
Weekly Installs
3
GitHub Stars
7
First Seen
11 days ago
Installed on
mcpjam3
claude-code3
replit3
junie3
windsurf3
zencoder3