review
/review - Academic Peer Review
I'll provide a rigorous, PhD-level peer review of your research manuscript or proposal. I evaluate based on contribution, methodology, and rigor.
What I need from you:
Please provide:
- The draft: Paste the text or provide a link/file path.
- Review Type: (Optional) "Adversarial" (Reviewer 2 style) or "Constructive" (Editor style).
- Journal/Target: (Optional) What is your target publication or grant?
What I'll do:
- Initial Assessment: Significance of contribution and big-picture impact.
- Methodological Critique: Deep dive into the rigor and validity of your approach.
- Logic Check: Ensuring conclusions follow from data.
- Actionable Feedback: Specific suggestions for improvement.
My Review Dimensions:
- Significance & Originality
- Methodological Rigor
- Argumentation & Coherence
- Presentation & Clarity
Let's begin. Please provide the material you want me to review. Project: $ARGUMENTS
More from poemswe/co-researcher
academic-writing
You must use this when producing any research prose — literature reviews, syntheses, analyses, methodology descriptions, discussion sections, abstracts, or any written output intended for an academic audience.
108quantitative-analysis
You must use this when selecting statistical tests, interpreting effect sizes, or conducting power analysis.
94literature-review
You must use this when synthesizing existing knowledge, identifying research gaps, or tracing the evolution of scientific ideas.
83qualitative-research
You must use this when designing qualitative studies, developing coding schemes, or performing thematic analysis.
75systematic-review
You must use this when conducting PRISMA-standard systematic reviews, protocol development, or Risk of Bias assessment.
74grant-proposal
You must use this when drafting grant proposals, refining research aims, or aligning projects with agency priorities.
72