merge-resolver
Merge Resolver
Resolve merge conflicts by analyzing git history and commit intent.
Quick Start
# Resolve conflicts for a specific PR
python3 .claude/skills/merge-resolver/scripts/resolve_pr_conflicts.py \
--pr-number 123 --branch-name "fix/my-feature" --target-branch "main"
# Dry-run mode (no side effects)
python3 .claude/skills/merge-resolver/scripts/resolve_pr_conflicts.py \
--pr-number 123 --branch-name "fix/test" --dry-run
Triggers
| Trigger Phrase | Operation |
|---|---|
resolve merge conflicts |
Auto-detect branch/PR and resolve |
fix conflicts on this branch |
Context-aware conflict resolution |
PR has conflicts with main |
Merge-based conflict resolution |
can't merge due to conflicts |
Analyze and fix blocking conflicts |
resolve PR conflicts |
Resolve conflicts for a specific PR number |
Process
Phase 1: Context Gathering
| Step | Action | Verification |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Fetch PR metadata via gh pr view |
PR metadata displayed |
| 1.2 | Checkout PR branch | git branch --show-current matches |
| 1.3 | Attempt merge with base (--no-commit) |
Conflict markers created |
| 1.4 | List conflicted files | git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U output |
Phase 2: Analysis and Resolution
| Step | Action | Verification |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1 | Classify files (auto-resolvable vs manual) | Classification logged |
| 2.2 | Auto-resolve known patterns (accept --theirs) |
Files staged cleanly |
| 2.3 | For manual files: run git blame, analyze intent |
Commit messages captured |
| 2.4 | Apply manual resolutions per decision framework | Conflict markers removed |
| 2.5 | Stage all resolved files | git diff --check clean |
Phase 3: Validation (BLOCKING)
| Step | Action | Verification |
|---|---|---|
| 3.1 | Verify no remaining conflict markers | git grep -n '<<<<<<<' -- returns no matches |
| 3.2 | Run session protocol validator | validate_session_json.py exits 0 |
| 3.3 | Run markdown lint | npx markdownlint-cli2 exits 0 |
| 3.4 | Commit merge resolution | Commit SHA recorded |
| 3.5 | Push to remote | Remote ref updated |
Intent Classification
Classify each side's changes to determine resolution priority.
| Type | Indicators | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| Security | "security", "vuln", "CVE" in message | Highest |
| Bugfix | "fix", "bug", "patch", "hotfix" in message | Highest |
| Feature | "feat", "add", "implement"; new functionality | Medium |
| Refactor | "refactor", "cleanup", "rename"; no behavior change | Medium |
| Style | "style", "format", "lint"; whitespace only | Lowest |
Decision Framework
| Scenario | Resolution |
|---|---|
| Same intent, compatible changes | Merge both |
| Bugfix vs feature | Bugfix wins; integrate feature around it |
| Conflicting logic | Prefer more recent or better-tested change |
| Style conflicts | Accept either; prefer consistency with surrounding code |
| Deletions vs modifications | Investigate why; deletion usually intentional |
Session File Rules
CRITICAL: Session files from main are immutable audit records.
| Action | Correct | Wrong |
|---|---|---|
| Session file conflict | Accept --theirs, rename ours to next number |
Accept --ours (alters main's record) |
| Same-numbered session | Keep both with different numbers | Overwrite one version |
See references/strategies.md for the full session file resolution workflow.
Auto-Resolvable Patterns
The script auto-resolves these by accepting the target branch version.
| Pattern | Rationale |
|---|---|
.agents/sessions/*.json |
Session files from main are immutable audit records |
.agents/* |
Session artifacts, constantly changing |
.serena/* |
Serena memories, auto-generated |
.claude/skills/*/*.md |
Skill definitions, main is authoritative |
.claude/commands/* |
Command definitions, main is authoritative |
.claude/agents/* |
Agent definitions, main is authoritative |
templates/* |
Template files, main is authoritative |
src/copilot-cli/* |
Platform agent definitions |
src/vs-code-agents/* |
Platform agent definitions |
src/claude/* |
Platform agent definitions |
.github/agents/* |
GitHub agent configs |
.github/prompts/* |
GitHub prompts |
package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml |
Lock files; regenerate from main |
Scripts
resolve_pr_conflicts.py
Resolves PR merge conflicts with auto-resolution for known file patterns.
python3 .claude/skills/merge-resolver/scripts/resolve_pr_conflicts.py \
--pr-number <number> --branch-name <name> [--target-branch <branch>] \
[--worktree-base-path <path>] [--dry-run]
Exit codes:
| Code | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 0 | Conflicts resolved successfully (and, if not --dry-run, pushed) |
| 1 | Non-auto-resolvable conflicts remain |
When running with --dry-run, exit code 0 indicates that conflicts were fully auto-resolvable and the changes would have been pushed, but no changes were made because of dry-run mode.
Output format (JSON):
{
"success": true,
"message": "Successfully resolved conflicts for PR #123",
"files_resolved": [".agents/HANDOFF.md"],
"files_blocked": []
}
Security: Branch name validation prevents command injection. Worktree path validation prevents path traversal.
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Instead |
|---|---|---|
| Alter session files from main | Breaks audit trail (immutable records) | Accept --theirs, then rename our session file to the next available number |
| Push without session validation | CI blocks with MUST violations | Run validate_session_json.py first |
| Manual edit of generated files | Lost on regeneration | Edit template, run generator |
Accept --ours for HANDOFF.md |
Branch version often stale | Accept --theirs (main is canonical) |
| Merge lock files manually | JSON corruption, broken deps | Accept base, regenerate with npm install |
Skip git blame analysis |
Wrong intent inference | Always check commit messages |
| Resolve before fetching PR context | Missing context, wrong base | Always gh pr view first |
Forget to stage .agents/ |
Dirty worktree CI failure | Include all .agents/ changes |
Verification
Success Criteria
| Criterion | Evidence |
|---|---|
| All conflicts resolved | git diff --check returns empty |
| No merge markers remain | git grep -n '<<<<<<<' -- returns no matches |
| Session protocol valid | validate_session_json.py exits 0 |
| Markdown lint passes | npx markdownlint-cli2 exits 0 |
| Push successful | Remote ref updated |
Completion Checklist
- All conflicted files staged (
git add) - No UU status in
git status --porcelain - Session log exists at
.agents/sessions/ - Session end checklist completed
- Serena memory updated
- Merge commit created
- Branch pushed to origin
Extension Points
Custom Auto-Resolvable Patterns
Add patterns to AUTO_RESOLVABLE_PATTERNS in resolve_pr_conflicts.py.
Custom Resolution Strategies
Add entries in references/strategies.md for domain-specific conflicts.
CI/CD Integration
- name: Resolve conflicts
env:
PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
HEAD_REF: ${{ github.head_ref }}
BASE_REF: ${{ github.base_ref }}
run: |
python3 .claude/skills/merge-resolver/scripts/resolve_pr_conflicts.py \
--pr-number "$PR_NUMBER" \
--branch-name "$HEAD_REF" \
--target-branch "$BASE_REF"
Related
- Security: Branch name and path validation prevent injection and traversal
- SESSION-PROTOCOL.md: Session end requirements (blocking gate)
- strategies.md: Detailed resolution patterns for edge cases
- merge-resolver-session-protocol-gap: Memory documenting root cause analysis
Why This Matters
Session protocol validation is a CI blocking gate. Pushing without completing session requirements causes CI failures with "MUST requirement(s) not met" errors.
Validation Commands
# 1. Ensure session log exists
SESSION_LOG=$(ls -t -- .agents/sessions/*.json 2>/dev/null | head -1)
if [ -z "$SESSION_LOG" ]; then
echo "ERROR: No session log found."
exit 1
fi
# 2. Run session protocol validator
python3 scripts/validate_session_json.py "$SESSION_LOG"
Session End Checklist (REQUIRED)
| Req | Step | Status |
|---|---|---|
| MUST | Complete session log (all sections filled) | [ ] |
| MUST | Update Serena memory (cross-session context) | [ ] |
| MUST | Run markdown lint | [ ] |
| MUST | Route to qa agent (feature implementation) | [ ] |
| MUST | Commit all changes (including .serena/memories) | [ ] |
| MUST NOT | Update .agents/HANDOFF.md directly |
[ ] |
Common Failures
| Error | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
E_TEMPLATE_DRIFT |
Session checklist outdated | Copy canonical checklist from SESSION-PROTOCOL.md |
E_QA_EVIDENCE |
QA row checked but no report path | Add QA report or use "SKIPPED: docs-only" |
E_DIRTY_WORKTREE |
Uncommitted changes | Stage and commit all files including .agents/ |
More from rjmurillo/ai-agents
reflect
CRITICAL learning capture. Extracts HIGH/MED/LOW confidence patterns from conversations to prevent repeating mistakes and preserve what works. Use PROACTIVELY after user corrections ("no", "wrong"), after praise ("perfect", "exactly"), when discovering edge cases, or when skills are heavily used. Without reflection, valuable learnings are LOST forever. Acts as continuous improvement engine for all skills. Invoke EARLY and OFTEN - every correction is a learning opportunity.
14threat-modeling
Structured security analysis using OWASP Four-Question Framework and STRIDE methodology. Generates threat matrices with risk ratings, mitigations, and prioritization. Use for attack surface analysis, security architecture review, or when asking what can go wrong.
2chestertons-fence
Investigate historical context of existing code, patterns, or constraints before proposing changes. Automates git archaeology, PR/ADR search, and dependency analysis to prevent removing structures without understanding their purpose.
2github-url-intercept
BLOCKING INTERCEPT: When ANY github.com URL appears in user input, STOP and use this skill. Never fetch GitHub HTML pages directly - they are 5-10MB and will exhaust your context window. This skill routes URLs to efficient API calls (1-50KB). Triggers on: pull/, issues/, blob/, tree/, commit/, compare/, discussions/.
2git-advanced-workflows
Advanced Git workflows including rebasing, cherry-picking, bisect, worktrees, and reflog. Use when managing complex Git histories, collaborating on feature branches, or recovering from repository issues.
2pr-comment-responder
PR review coordinator who gathers comment context, acknowledges every
2