planner
Planner Skill
Purpose
Two workflows for complex tasks:
- Planning workflow (planner.py): Create and review implementation plans
- Execution workflow (executor.py): Execute approved plans through delegation
Invocation Routing
Invoke planner.py when user asks to:
- "plan", "design", "architect" a feature
- "review" an existing plan
- Break down a complex task into milestones
Invoke executor.py when user asks to:
- "execute", "implement", "run" a plan
- "resume" or "continue" execution
- Provides a plan file path for implementation
When to Use
Use the planner skill when the task has:
- Multiple milestones with dependencies
- Architectural decisions requiring documentation
- Migration steps that need coordination
- Complexity that benefits from forced reflection pauses
When to Skip
Skip the planner skill when the task is:
- Single-step with obvious implementation
- A quick fix or minor change
- Already well-specified by the user
Scripts
| Script | Purpose |
|---|---|
scripts/planner.py |
Planning and review workflow with step-based state management |
scripts/executor.py |
Execution workflow for approved plans with milestone delegation |
Triggers
| Trigger Phrase | Operation |
|---|---|
plan this feature |
planner.py (planning phase) |
create implementation plan |
planner.py (planning phase) |
review the plan and pick up next item |
executor.py (execution phase) |
execute the plan at plans/X.md |
executor.py (execution phase) |
resume execution |
executor.py (continue from last step) |
Anti-Patterns
| Avoid | Why | Instead |
|---|---|---|
| Skipping review phase after planning | Misses quality/temporal issues | Always run review steps 1-2 before execution |
| Starting execution without /clear | Context pollution from planning | User should /clear before execution workflow |
| Manually following workflow steps | Script manages state and transitions | Run the script and follow its output |
| Planning single-step tasks | Overhead exceeds benefit | Implement directly without planner |
| Editing plan during execution | Creates drift between plan and actions | Return to planning phase for changes |
Verification
After planning:
- Plan file written to specified path
- Review phase completed (both TW and QR steps)
- Review verdict is PASS or PASS_WITH_CONCERNS
After execution:
- All milestones marked complete
- Post-implementation QR passed
- Documentation step completed
- Retrospective generated
Process
Planning Overview
PLANNING PHASE (steps 1-N)
|
v
Write plan to file
|
v
REVIEW PHASE (steps 1-2)
|-- Step 1: @agent-technical-writer (plan-annotation)
|-- Step 2: @agent-quality-reviewer (plan-review)
v
APPROVED --> Execution workflow
Planning Preconditions
Before invoking step 1, you MUST have:
- Plan file path - If user did not specify, ASK before proceeding
- Clear problem statement - What needs to be accomplished
Planning Invocation
python3 scripts/planner.py \
--step-number 1 \
--total-steps <estimated_steps> \
--thoughts "<your thinking about the problem>"
Planning Arguments
| Argument | Description |
|---|---|
--phase |
Workflow phase: planning (default) or review |
--step-number |
Current step (starts at 1) |
--total-steps |
Estimated total steps for this phase |
--thoughts |
Your thinking, findings, and progress |
Planning Steps
- Confirm preconditions (plan file path, problem statement)
- Invoke step 1 immediately
- Complete REQUIRED ACTIONS from output
- Invoke next step with your thoughts
- Repeat until
STATUS: phase_complete - Write plan to file using format below
Phase Transition: Planning to Review
When planning phase completes, the script outputs an explicit ACTION REQUIRED
marker:
============================================
>>> ACTION REQUIRED: INVOKE REVIEW PHASE <<<
============================================
You MUST invoke the review phase before proceeding to execution.
The review phase ensures:
- Temporally contaminated comments are fixed (via @agent-technical-writer)
- Code snippets have WHY comments (via @agent-technical-writer)
- Plan is validated for production risks (via @agent-quality-reviewer)
- Documentation needs are identified
Review Phase
After writing the plan file, transition to review phase:
python3 scripts/planner.py \
--phase review \
--step-number 1 \
--total-steps 2 \
--thoughts "Plan written to [path/to/plan.md]"
Review Step 1: Technical Writer
Delegate to @agent-technical-writer with mode: plan-annotation
Review Step 2: Quality Reviewer
Delegate to @agent-quality-reviewer with mode: plan-review
After Review
- PASS / PASS_WITH_CONCERNS: Ready for execution workflow
- NEEDS_CHANGES: Return to planning phase to address issues
Execution Workflow (executor.py)
Execution Overview
Step 1: Execution Planning
|
v
Step 2: Reconciliation (conditional, if prior work signaled)
|
v
Step 3: Milestone Execution (repeat until all complete)
|
v
Step 4: Post-Implementation QR
|
v
QR issues? --YES--> Step 5: Issue Resolution --> delegate fixes --> Step 4
|
NO
v
Step 6: Documentation
|
v
Step 7: Retrospective
Execution Preconditions
Before invoking step 1, you MUST have:
- Approved plan file - Plan that passed review phase
- Clear context window - User should /clear before execution
Execution Invocation
python3 scripts/executor.py \
--plan-file PATH \
--step-number 1 \
--total-steps 7 \
--thoughts "<user's request and context>"
Execution Arguments
| Argument | Description |
|---|---|
--plan-file |
Path to the approved plan file |
--step-number |
Current step (1-7) |
--total-steps |
Always 7 for executor |
--thoughts |
Your current thinking and status |
Execution Steps
| Step | Name | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Execution Planning | Analyze plan, detect reconciliation, strategy |
| 2 | Reconciliation | (conditional) Validate existing code vs plan |
| 3 | Milestone Execution | Delegate to agents, run tests (repeat) |
| 4 | Post-Implementation QR | Quality review of implemented code |
| 5 | Issue Resolution | (conditional) Present issues, collect fixes |
| 6 | Documentation | TW pass for CLAUDE.md, README.md |
| 7 | Retrospective | Present execution summary |
Note: Step 3 may be re-invoked multiple times until all milestones complete. Step 4 may loop back through step 5 until QR passes.
Resources
| Resource | Purpose |
|---|---|
resources/plan-format.md |
Plan template (injected at planning completion) |
resources/diff-format.md |
Authoritative specification for code change format |
resources/temporal-contamination.md |
Detecting/fixing temporally contaminated comments |
resources/default-conventions.md |
Default conventions when project docs are silent |
Note: Execution guidance is embedded directly in scripts/executor.py (not in
separate resource files) since it's only used by that script.
References
| Reference | Purpose |
|---|---|
references/strategy-ooda-loop.md |
Map planning and execution phases to OODA stages |
references/design-pit-of-success.md |
Design milestones so the obvious path produces correct results |
references/mental-models-galls-law.md |
Validate milestone decomposition against incremental complexity |
.claude/skills/analyze/references/engineering-complexity-tiers.md |
Classify tasks by tier (single source of truth in analyze skill) |
references/explainers-and-intents.md |
Write explainers before work, use intents as permission gates |
references/agent-architecture-patterns.md |
Skill budget rule, 3-file planning pattern, milestone decomposition for agent systems |
references/hybrid-memory-architecture.md |
Hybrid retrieval cascade, memory decay tiers, decision extraction for planning memory systems |
Quick Reference
# === PLANNING WORKFLOW ===
# Start planning
python3 scripts/planner.py --step-number 1 --total-steps 4 --thoughts "..."
# Continue planning
python3 scripts/planner.py --step-number 2 --total-steps 4 --thoughts "..."
# Start review (after plan written)
python3 scripts/planner.py --phase review --step-number 1 --total-steps 2 \
--thoughts "Plan at plans/feature.md"
# Continue review
python3 scripts/planner.py --phase review --step-number 2 --total-steps 2 \
--thoughts "TW done, ready for QR"
# === EXECUTION WORKFLOW ===
# Start execution
python3 scripts/executor.py --plan-file plans/feature.md --step-number 1 \
--total-steps 7 --thoughts "Execute the feature plan"
# Continue milestone execution
python3 scripts/executor.py --plan-file plans/feature.md --step-number 3 \
--total-steps 7 --thoughts "Completed M1, M2. Executing M3..."
# After QR passes
python3 scripts/executor.py --plan-file plans/feature.md --step-number 6 \
--total-steps 7 --thoughts "QR passed. Running documentation."
# Generate retrospective
python3 scripts/executor.py --plan-file plans/feature.md --step-number 7 \
--total-steps 7 --thoughts "Execution complete. Generating retrospective."
More from rjmurillo/ai-agents
reflect
CRITICAL learning capture. Extracts HIGH/MED/LOW confidence patterns from conversations to prevent repeating mistakes and preserve what works. Use PROACTIVELY after user corrections ("no", "wrong"), after praise ("perfect", "exactly"), when discovering edge cases, or when skills are heavily used. Without reflection, valuable learnings are LOST forever. Acts as continuous improvement engine for all skills. Invoke EARLY and OFTEN - every correction is a learning opportunity.
14threat-modeling
Structured security analysis using OWASP Four-Question Framework and STRIDE methodology. Generates threat matrices with risk ratings, mitigations, and prioritization. Use for attack surface analysis, security architecture review, or when asking what can go wrong.
2chestertons-fence
Investigate historical context of existing code, patterns, or constraints before proposing changes. Automates git archaeology, PR/ADR search, and dependency analysis to prevent removing structures without understanding their purpose.
2git-advanced-workflows
Advanced Git workflows including rebasing, cherry-picking, bisect, worktrees, and reflog. Use when managing complex Git histories, collaborating on feature branches, or recovering from repository issues.
2pr-comment-responder
PR review coordinator who gathers comment context, acknowledges every
2github
Execute GitHub operations (PRs, issues, milestones, labels, comments, merges)
2