test-review
SKILL.md
Test Review Skill
Trigger
- Keywords: test coverage, test review, are tests sufficient, generate tests, test gen, coverage
When NOT to Use
- Code review (use
codex-code-review) - Document review (use
doc-review) - Just want to run tests (use
/verify)
Commands
| Command | Description | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
/codex-test-review |
Review test sufficiency | Required |
/codex-test-gen |
Generate unit tests | Add missing tests |
/check-coverage |
Test coverage analysis | After feature dev |
Workflow: /codex-test-review
Smart detect target → Read test + source → Codex review (5 dimensions) → Coverage assessment + Gate → Loop if Needs additions
Step 1: Smart Detection
| Input | Behavior |
|---|---|
| File path | Review that file directly |
| Directory | Review all tests in directory |
| Description | Auto-find related test files |
| Module name | Search related test files |
| No parameter | Auto-detect from git diff |
Step 2: Read Test and Source
- Read test file (
TEST_FILE) - Read corresponding source (
SOURCE_FILE, inferred from test path)
Step 3: Codex Review
First review: mcp__codex__codex with test review prompt. See @references/codex-prompt-test-review.md.
Loop review: mcp__codex__codex-reply with re-review template. See @references/codex-prompt-test-review.md.
Config: sandbox: 'read-only', approval-policy: 'never'
Save the returned threadId.
Workflow: /codex-test-gen
Read source → Derive test path → Codex generate → Save test file → Suggest review
Steps
- Read source file
- Derive test path:
src/service/xxx.ts→test/unit/service/xxx.test.ts - Codex generates tests. See @references/codex-prompt-test-gen.md.
- Save to target path
- Suggest: run tests then
/codex-test-review
Review Dimensions
| Dimension | Scoring Criteria | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Happy path | All public methods, main flows | High |
| Error handling | try/catch, error callbacks | High |
| Edge cases | null/undefined, extremes, empty sets | Medium |
| Mock quality | Not excessive, not insufficient | Medium |
Three-Layer Tests
| Type | Directory | Mock | Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unit | test/unit/ |
Full | Single function |
| Integration | test/integration/ |
Only external | Inter-module |
| E2E | test/e2e/ |
Prohibited | Complete flow |
Common Boundaries
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| String | "", " ", null, undefined, very long |
| Number | 0, -1, NaN, Infinity, MAX_SAFE_INTEGER |
| Array | [], [null], very large, nested |
| Object | {}, null, circular reference |
Review Loop
⚠️ @CLAUDE.md auto-loop: fix → re-review → ... → ✅ PASS ⚠️
⛔ Needs additions → add tests → /codex-test-review --continue <threadId> → repeat until ✅ Sufficient.
Max 3 rounds. Still failing → report blocker.
Output
## Test Coverage Review
| Dimension | Coverage | Rating |
|-----------|----------|--------|
| ... | ... | ⭐1-5 |
### Gate: ✅ Tests sufficient / ⛔ Needs additions
Verification
- Coverage assessment includes all dimensions
- Gate is clear (✅ Tests sufficient / ⛔ Needs additions)
- Missing tests have specific code suggestions
- Codex independently researched source code branches
References
- Test review prompt:
references/codex-prompt-test-review.md - Test gen prompt:
references/codex-prompt-test-gen.md - Standards: @rules/testing.md
Examples
Input: /codex-test-review test/unit/service/xxx.test.ts
Action: Read test + source → Codex review → Coverage assessment + Gate
Input: /codex-test-gen src/service/xxx.ts
Action: Read source → Codex generate → Save test → Suggest review
Input: Are this service's tests sufficient?
Action: /codex-test-review → Assess coverage → Output gaps + Gate
Weekly Installs
1
Repository
sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flowGitHub Stars
86
First Seen
7 days ago
Security Audits
Installed on
amp1
cline1
opencode1
cursor1
kimi-cli1
codex1