XIP Writing (XerahS Improvement Proposals)
XIP Writing Skill
This skill guides writing XerahS Improvement Proposals (XIPs) that are actionable, well-structured, and aligned with project architecture.
Workflow: GitHub is the source of truth for XIPs; the tasks/ folder is a backup. Create and edit XIPs as GitHub issues (label xip), then run the sync script to update the tasks folder. See xip-sync for create/edit/sync workflows.
What is a XIP?
A XIP (XerahS Improvement Proposal) is a design document that:
- Describes a new feature, enhancement, or architectural change
- Provides implementation guidance for developers
- Serves as the single source of truth for the feature scope
- Links to a GitHub issue for tracking
XIP Structure
Header Template
# XIP0001 Short Descriptive Title
**Status**: Draft | In Review | Ready for Implementation | In Progress | Completed
**Created**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Updated**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Area**: Desktop | Mobile | Core | Uploaders | UI | Architecture
**Goal**: One-sentence description of what this achieves.
---
Naming Convention
Format: XIPXXXX Description
- XIP number padded with leading zeros (4 digits)
- Single space between number and description
- NO square brackets [ ]
- NO colon after XIP number
- NO hyphen/dash between number and description
| Format | Status |
|---|---|
XIP0030 Mobile Share Feature |
✅ Correct |
XIP0030: Mobile Share Feature |
❌ No colon |
[XIP0030] Mobile Share Feature |
❌ No brackets |
XIP0030 - Mobile Share Feature |
❌ No dash |
XIP30 Mobile Share Feature |
❌ Must be 4 digits |
This format applies to:
- Markdown file names:
XIP0030_Mobile_Share_Feature.md - GitHub issue titles:
XIP0030 Mobile Share Feature - Headers inside XIP files:
# XIP0030 Mobile Share Feature
Required Sections
1. Overview
- What problem does this solve?
- Why is this approach chosen?
- Key principles (reuse, no duplication, platform neutrality, etc.)
- Keep it concise - 2-4 paragraphs maximum
2. Prerequisites (if any)
- SDK versions
- Platform requirements
- Dependencies to install
3. Implementation Phases
Break into logical phases. Each phase should:
- Have a clear objective
- Include code examples where helpful
- Reference existing patterns to follow
- List specific files to create/modify
Example Phase Structure:
### Phase N: Phase Name
Description of what this phase accomplishes.
**Key Files:**
- `src/XerahS.Core/Services/NewService.cs`
**Code Example:**
```csharp
// Include representative code
Rules:
- Specific constraints for this phase
- What NOT to do
#### 4. Non-Negotiable Rules
Explicit constraints that must be followed:
- Do not create duplicate upload pipelines
- Do not call providers directly from platform code
- Do not duplicate TaskSettings cloning logic
- Platform-specific code stays in platform folders
- etc.
#### 5. Deliverables
Numbered list of concrete outputs:
1. New service in XerahS.Core
2. Settings additions
3. Platform implementations
4. UI components
5. Documentation
#### 6. Affected Components
List of projects/files that will change:
- XerahS.Core: Specific classes
- XerahS.App: Platform entry points
- XerahS.Uploaders: Provider changes (if any)
- etc.
#### 7. Architecture Summary (recommended)
ASCII diagram showing data flow:
Component A ↓ Component B ← XerahS.Core ↓ Component C
---
## Writing Principles
### 1. Reuse Existing Infrastructure
**Before writing new code, study:**
- WatchFolderManager pattern for file handling
- TaskManager.StartFileTask for upload triggering
- TaskSettings.Clone for settings handling
- UploaderProviderBase for provider patterns
- TaskHelpers for file naming/storage
**Golden Rule:** If XerahS already does something similar, reuse that pattern.
### 2. Platform Neutrality
- Core logic goes in `XerahS.Core` or `XerahS.Common`
- Platform-specific code stays in `Platforms/` folders
- Use abstractions (interfaces) to bridge platform and core
- Core services must not know about Android, iOS, or Avalonia views
### 3. No Duplicate Logic
Explicitly forbid:
- Parallel upload pipelines
- Copy-pasted file handling code
- Reimplemented file naming logic
- Duplicated settings cloning
- Direct provider calls from platform code
### 4. Privacy and Security First
- Prefer explicit user action over automatic monitoring
- Request permissions only when necessary
- Use platform secure storage for credentials
- Document privacy implications
### 5. Clear Separation of Concerns
| Layer | Responsibility |
|-------|---------------|
| Platform Heads | Receive platform data, convert to local files |
| Core Services | Process files, invoke TaskManager |
| TaskManager | Coordinate upload jobs |
| Providers | Execute actual uploads |
| UI | Display results, user interaction |
---
## XIP Evolution Process
XIPs often evolve during review. Document significant changes:
```markdown
## Evolution History
| Date | Change | Rationale |
|------|--------|-----------|
| 2026-02-12 | Switched from auto-monitoring to share-based | Battery/privacy concerns |
When rewriting a XIP:
- Preserve the XIP number
- Update the "Updated" date
- Document the rationale for changes
- Update linked GitHub issue
GitHub Issue Integration (source of truth)
Every XIP lives as a GitHub issue (label xip). The issue body is the full XIP content. The tasks/ folder is a backup generated by the xip-sync script.
Issue Title Format
XIP0001 Brief Description
Must follow XIP naming convention:
- 4-digit zero-padded number
- Single space separator
- No brackets, no colon, no dash
Example: XIP0030 Implement Share to XerahS on Mobile
Issue Body
- Is the full XIP markdown (Overview, Phases, Deliverables, etc.). No separate “link to file” — the body is the XIP.
- After editing the issue, run the sync script so the tasks folder backup is updated.
Create / Edit / Sync
Use the xip-sync skill to create issues, edit them, and run sync-from-github.ps1 to refresh the tasks backup.
Review Checklist
Before finalizing a XIP:
- Header information complete (Status, Dates, Area, Goal)
- Overview explains the "why"
- Implementation phases are logical and actionable
- Code examples are syntactically correct
- References to existing patterns are accurate
- Non-negotiable rules explicitly stated
- Deliverables are concrete and verifiable
- Affected components listed
- Architecture diagram included (for complex features)
- No duplicate logic implied
- Platform neutrality maintained
- GitHub issue created/updated (body = full XIP); sync run if needed
Common Patterns
Pattern: Share-to-App (Mobile)
When implementing "share" functionality:
- Platform receives shared content (Intent/Share Extension)
- Platform copies to local app storage
- Platform signals/passes paths to Core service
- Core service processes via TaskManager
- UI displays results
Pattern: New Upload Provider
When adding an uploader:
- Extend UploaderProviderBase
- Add config model
- Add settings UI (reuse existing patterns)
- Implement upload logic
- Register in provider factory
- No changes to upload pipeline
Pattern: Cross-Platform Service
When creating a service that works everywhere:
- Define interface in Abstractions
- Implement platform-specific versions in Platform folders
- Register in PlatformServices or DI
- Use from Core via interface only
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
Don't: Auto-Monitoring on Mobile
Monitor screenshots folder automatically ← BAD
Let user share files explicitly ← GOOD
Don't: Platform Code Doing Uploads
Android MainActivity calls S3 directly ← BAD
Android → ShareImportService → TaskManager ← GOOD
Don't: Duplicate TaskSettings Logic
Create new settings cloning for mobile ← BAD
Reuse existing TaskSettings.Clone() ← GOOD
Don't: UI in Core
Show MessageBox from ShareImportService ← BAD
Return results, let caller display ← GOOD
File Locations (backup only)
The tasks folder is a backup of GitHub. Sync with .ai/skills/xip-sync/scripts/sync-from-github.ps1. Status is not reflected in paths; all backup files live in tasks/ as XIP####-Title-Slug.md.
- Backup:
tasks/XIPXXXX-Descriptive-Name.md(single folder) - Source of truth: GitHub issue
https://github.com/ShareX/XerahS/issues/XXX
Quick Reference: XIP Template
# XIP0001 Title
**Status**: Draft
**Created**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Area**: Area
**Goal**: One sentence.
---
## Overview
Problem and approach.
## Prerequisites
- List
## Implementation Phases
### Phase 1: Name
Description.
**Key Files:**
- Path
**Code:**
```csharp
// Example
Rules:
- Do X
- Don't Y
Non-Negotiable Rules
- Rule one
- Rule two
Deliverables
- Item
- Item
Affected Components
- Project: Changes
Architecture Summary
Diagram
---
## Key Takeaways
1. **Study first** - Understand existing patterns before writing
2. **Reuse always** - No duplicate upload pipelines, no duplicate settings logic
3. **Separate concerns** - Platform code handles platform things, Core handles logic
4. **Be explicit** - Non-negotiable rules, clear deliverables, concrete file paths
5. **Privacy first** - Prefer explicit user action over automatic monitoring
6. **GitHub first** - Create/edit XIP in the issue; run xip-sync to update tasks backup
---
**Remember**: A good XIP is precise, reusable, and respects existing architecture.