request-analyzer
Request Analyzer
This skill proactively analyzes user requests to determine the task type, assess prompt quality, and intelligently recommend which other skills should be activated to best serve the user's needs.
Purpose
Act as an intelligent coordinator that:
- Analyzes every user request systematically
- Assesses prompt quality (clarity, specificity, completeness)
- Identifies the task type and appropriate workflow
- Recommends activating specific skills when beneficial
- Ensures users get the best possible assistance
When to Use This Skill
This skill should activate for EVERY user request at the start of conversations to ensure optimal workflow orchestration.
Specifically activate when:
- A new conversation begins
- User submits a new request or question
- User asks for help with a task
- Any coding, design, or technical request is made
- User's intent needs clarification
Core Analysis Process
Step 1: Quick Assessment
Immediately evaluate the request on three dimensions:
Clarity (0-100%):
- Is the request unambiguous?
- Are terms clearly defined?
- Is there only one reasonable interpretation?
Specificity (0-100%):
- Is sufficient context provided?
- Are technical requirements specified?
- Is the scope well-defined?
Completeness (0-100%):
- Is all necessary information present?
- Are success criteria defined?
- Are constraints mentioned?
Step 2: Task Type Identification
Classify the request into one of these categories:
- Code Implementation - Creating new code
- Debugging/Fixing - Resolving bugs or errors
- Analysis/Review - Examining code or systems
- Design Implementation - Building UI from designs
- Refactoring - Improving existing code
- Explanation/Learning - Understanding concepts
- General Question - Non-technical queries
Reference references/skill-activation-guide.md for detailed classification criteria.
Step 3: Skill Recommendation
Based on assessment and task type, determine which skills would be beneficial:
Consider prompt-optimizer if:
- Clarity score < 60%
- Specificity score < 60%
- Completeness score < 60%
- Overall quality < 70%
- Critical information missing
- Multiple interpretations possible
Consider ui-analyzer if:
- User mentions: screenshot, design, mockup, Figma, image
- User provides or references an image file
- Request includes "implement this design"
- Task involves analyzing UI layout
Consider react-component-generator if:
- User requests creating React component
- Mentions: component, form, button, modal, card, list
- After ui-analyzer identifies components to build
- Clear component requirements are present
Step 4: Decision and Action
Make one of these decisions:
Option A: Recommend Optimization If prompt quality is low, explicitly suggest using prompt-optimizer:
"I notice your request could benefit from more clarity. Let me activate the
prompt-optimizer skill to help structure a more specific request."
Option B: Recommend Specific Skill If request is clear but matches a skill's domain:
"This looks like a UI design implementation task. I'll use the ui-analyzer
skill to systematically analyze the design and generate the code."
Option C: Proceed Directly If request is clear, complete, and doesn't need specialized skills:
"Your request is clear. I'll proceed with [task description]."
Option D: Ask for Clarification If critical information is missing and cannot be assumed:
"To help you effectively, I need to know: [specific questions]"
Analysis Workflow
For Every Request
- Read the request carefully
- Score on three dimensions (Clarity, Specificity, Completeness)
- Identify task type using the classification system
- Check skill activation criteria from the reference guide
- Make recommendation (optimize, activate skill, proceed, or clarify)
- Take action based on the decision
Detailed Steps
Step 1: Initial Read
- Understand user intent
- Note any attachments or references
- Consider conversational context
Step 2: Quality Scoring
Clarity Check:
- No vague language ("thing", "something", "stuff")?
- All terms defined?
- Single clear interpretation?
- Action verb present?
Specificity Check:
- Context provided?
- Technical specs mentioned (for code)?
- Scope defined?
- Examples given (if helpful)?
Completeness Check:
- All inputs provided?
- Success criteria stated?
- Constraints mentioned?
- Edge cases considered?
Step 3: Task Classification
Match against patterns in references/skill-activation-guide.md:
- Code Implementation patterns
- Debugging patterns
- Analysis patterns
- Design Implementation patterns
- Refactoring patterns
Step 4: Skill Matching
For each available skill, check if activation criteria are met:
prompt-optimizer:
- Quality score < 70%? → Consider
- Missing critical info? → Consider
- Vague language present? → Consider
- Multiple interpretations? → Consider
ui-analyzer:
- Screenshot/design mentioned? → Activate
- Image provided? → Activate
- "Implement design" request? → Activate
react-component-generator:
- React component requested? → Consider
- After prompt optimization? → Consider
- Clear component spec? → Activate
Step 5: Recommendation
Based on analysis, formulate recommendation:
- Which skill(s) to activate
- Why they're beneficial
- What to expect from them
Step 6: Execution
Either:
- Explicitly note the skill activation (for transparency)
- Seamlessly integrate skill usage
- Ask for user confirmation if uncertain
Output Formats
Format 1: Optimization Recommended (Low Quality Prompt)
## Request Analysis
I've analyzed your request and noticed it could benefit from more specificity.
**Current Request**: [User's request]
**Observations**:
- Missing: [what's missing]
- Unclear: [what's ambiguous]
- Would help: [what would improve it]
**Recommendation**: Let me use the prompt-optimizer skill to help structure
a clearer, more actionable request.
[Then activate prompt-optimizer]
Format 2: Skill Recommended (Good Prompt, Specific Domain)
## Request Analysis
Your request is clear and matches our ui-analyzer skill's capabilities.
**Task Type**: Design Implementation
**Recommended Approach**:
1. Use ui-analyzer to examine the screenshot
2. Extract design tokens and components
3. Generate React code with Tailwind CSS
Proceeding with UI analysis...
[Then activate ui-analyzer]
Format 3: Direct Execution (High Quality, No Special Skill Needed)
## Request Analysis
Your request is clear and complete. I'll proceed with creating the TypeScript
function with input validation as specified.
[Proceed with implementation]
Format 4: Clarification Needed
## Request Analysis
To help you effectively, I need some additional information:
1. [Question 1]
2. [Question 2]
3. [Question 3]
Once I have these details, I can [what you'll do].
Integration with Other Skills
With prompt-optimizer
When to Delegate:
- Quality scores indicate issues
- Request is vague or incomplete
- Multiple interpretations exist
- Critical information missing
How:
- Identify the quality issues
- Explain why optimization would help
- Mention activating prompt-optimizer
- Let prompt-optimizer take over
Example Flow:
User: "Make a form"
↓
request-analyzer: Detects low specificity
↓
request-analyzer: "This request needs more details. Activating prompt-optimizer..."
↓
prompt-optimizer: Analyzes and provides optimized version
↓
User: Confirms optimized version
↓
react-component-generator: Creates the well-specified form
With ui-analyzer
When to Delegate:
- Screenshot or design mentioned
- Image file provided
- Design implementation requested
How:
- Confirm it's a design implementation task
- Verify image is available or referenced
- Explain ui-analyzer will handle it
- Let ui-analyzer take over
Example Flow:
User: "Build this UI [screenshot attached]"
↓
request-analyzer: Detects design implementation task
↓
request-analyzer: "I'll use ui-analyzer to examine your design..."
↓
ui-analyzer: Analyzes screenshot and generates code
With react-component-generator
When to Delegate:
- React component requested
- Specifications are clear
- No design screenshot (verbal description)
How:
- Confirm component requirements are clear
- If not clear, use prompt-optimizer first
- Once clear, mention using react-component-generator
- Let it handle component creation
Example Flow:
User: "Create a React login form with email/password, validation, TypeScript"
↓
request-analyzer: Detects high-quality component request
↓
request-analyzer: "Clear component spec. Using react-component-generator..."
↓
react-component-generator: Creates the component
Decision Matrix
| Prompt Quality | Has Screenshot | Task Type | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low (<70%) | No | Any | → prompt-optimizer |
| Low (<70%) | Yes | Design | → prompt-optimizer first, then ui-analyzer |
| High (>80%) | Yes | Design | → ui-analyzer |
| High (>80%) | No | Component | → react-component-generator |
| High (>80%) | No | General Code | → Proceed directly |
| Medium (70-80%) | No | Any | → Ask clarifying questions OR proceed |
Special Considerations
Conversational Context
If this is a follow-up in an ongoing conversation:
- Previous messages may provide missing context
- Don't over-analyze brief follow-ups
- "Now add validation" is fine after "Create a form"
- Consider the full conversation history
User Experience
Balance thoroughness with efficiency:
- Don't over-process simple, clear requests
- Avoid creating friction for experienced users
- Be helpful but not pedantic
- Transparent about why skills are beneficial
Confidence Levels
High Confidence (>90%) - Act decisively:
- Prompt clearly matches skill domain
- Quality issues are obvious
- Recommendation is unambiguous
Medium Confidence (60-90%) - Suggest and explain:
- Partial match to skill domain
- Some quality concerns
- Explain the benefit of using a skill
Low Confidence (<60%) - Ask or proceed cautiously:
- Unclear match
- No obvious quality issues
- Might not need special skills
Reference Usage
Consult references/skill-activation-guide.md for:
- Available Skills - Full list with activation criteria
- Request Type Classification - Detailed patterns
- Decision Tree - Visual workflow guide
- Multi-Skill Scenarios - Complex activation patterns
- Activation Confidence Levels - When to activate
- Common Patterns - Recognize typical requests
- Edge Cases - Handle special situations
Examples
Example 1: Vague Request
User: "Fix my code"
Analysis:
- Clarity: 20% (what code? what's wrong?)
- Specificity: 10% (no file, no error, no context)
- Completeness: 15% (no reproduction steps, no expected behavior)
- Overall: 15% → Very Low
Decision: Activate prompt-optimizer
Output:
"I notice your request needs more details to be actionable. Let me help
structure it using the prompt-optimizer skill.
Missing information:
- Which file or code section?
- What's the current behavior?
- What error messages appear?
- What should happen instead?
[Activating prompt-optimizer...]"
Example 2: UI Design Request
User: "Implement this login page design [screenshot]"
Analysis:
- Clarity: 85% (clear intent)
- Specificity: 80% (has design, mentions login page)
- Completeness: 75% (might need tech stack clarification)
- Task Type: Design Implementation
- Has Screenshot: Yes
Decision: Activate ui-analyzer (might clarify tech stack within workflow)
Output:
"I'll analyze your login page design and generate the React components.
Using the ui-analyzer skill to:
1. Examine the layout and components
2. Extract design tokens (colors, spacing, typography)
3. Generate React + TypeScript + Tailwind code
[Activating ui-analyzer...]"
Example 3: Clear Component Request
User: "Create a React Button component with TypeScript, supporting primary/
secondary/danger variants, sm/md/lg sizes, and Tailwind CSS styling"
Analysis:
- Clarity: 95% (very clear)
- Specificity: 95% (all tech specs present)
- Completeness: 90% (comprehensive requirements)
- Task Type: Code Implementation (React component)
- Overall: 93% → Excellent
Decision: Activate react-component-generator directly
Output:
"Excellent! Your component requirements are clear and complete. I'll use the
react-component-generator skill to create this button component.
[Activating react-component-generator...]"
Example 4: General Question
User: "What's the difference between useState and useReducer in React?"
Analysis:
- Clarity: 100% (perfectly clear)
- Task Type: Explanation/Learning
- No coding task
- No design implementation
Decision: Proceed directly (no special skill needed)
Output:
"Great question! Let me explain the differences between useState and useReducer..."
[Provide explanation directly - no skill activation needed]
Best Practices
- Be proactive but not intrusive - Help without creating friction
- Explain the value - Tell users why a skill will help
- Stay transparent - Mention which skills you're using and why
- Respect user time - Don't over-analyze trivial requests
- Learn from context - Consider conversation history
- Balance automation with judgment - Skills are tools, not rules
- Prioritize user success - The goal is better outcomes, not perfect process
Important Notes
- This skill is a coordinator, not a blocker
- High-quality prompts should flow smoothly without intervention
- Skills should enhance, not hinder, the user experience
- When in doubt, ask the user rather than making assumptions
- Transparency builds trust - explain your reasoning
- The ultimate goal is helping users succeed with their tasks
More from staruhub/claudeskills
geek-skills-a-share-analyst
A股专业分析师助手,提供每日股价分析、选股策略和投资建议。适用于:(1) 获取A股实时行情和历史数据,(2) 技术面分析(K线形态、MACD、KDJ、RSI、布林带等),(3) 基本面分析(财务指标、估值分析),(4) 板块热点追踪,(5) 选股策略筛选,(6) 量化因子分析,(7) 生成每日股市分析报告。当用户询问"帮我分析股票"、"今日选股"、"A股行情分析"、"技术分析"、"基本面分析"、"量化选股"等相关问题时触发。
70geek-skills-product-manager
资深产品经理助手,提供PRD文档创作与评审、产品策略咨询、留存增长分析、竞品研究、功能优先级排序等全方位产品管理支持。适用于创作或评审PRD/MRD/BRD/用户故事等产品文档;诊断产品问题(留存低、转化差、增长瓶颈)并给出可执行策略;进行竞品分析和市场研究;设计功能方案和用户体验优化。当用户提到"PRD"、"需求文档"、"产品规划"、"用户留存"、"功能设计"、"竞品分析"、"产品指标"、"增长策略"、"用户体验优化"、"功能优先级"等产品管理相关话题时,使用此skill。即使用户没有明确说"产品",但在讨论App功能设计、用户增长、商业模式、需求分析等话题时也应触发。
40geek-skills-c-drive-cleaner
Windows C盘清理和磁盘空间管理工具。当用户需要清理C盘、释放磁盘空间、查找大文件、分析磁盘占用、删除临时文件、清理缓存、管理Windows系统垃圾文件时使用此skill。适用于以下场景:(1)C盘空间不足需要清理;(2)查找和删除大文件;(3)分析磁盘空间占用;(4)清理系统临时文件和缓存;(5)清理浏览器缓存;(6)清理回收站;(7)清理系统日志;(8)优化Windows磁盘空间。
36geek-skills-gaokao-expert
资深高考命题专家助手,提供专业的命题指导和评审服务。适用于创作高考试题、评审试题质量、分析试卷结构、了解命题趋势等场景。结合文档工具提取解压文件,使用网络搜索了解最新命题趋势,使用分析工具评估题目质量和试卷结构。涵盖"一核四层四翼"评价体系、2025年命题趋势、题型规范、评分标准、命题流程等多个维度,符合高考命题最佳实践。
35geek-skills-mineru-pdf-parser
PDF解析工具,将复杂PDF文档转换为LLM友好的Markdown/JSON格式。适用于:(1) 将PDF转换为Markdown或JSON格式,(2) 提取PDF中的文本、表格、公式、图像,(3) 处理学术论文、技术文档、商业报告的PDF解析,(4) 为RAG应用准备高质量文档数据,(5) 批量处理PDF文件。触发关键词包括:"PDF解析"、"PDF转Markdown"、"PDF转JSON"、"提取PDF表格"、"提取PDF公式"、"MinerU"、"文档解析"、"PDF extraction"、"convert PDF"、"parse PDF"等。
33geek-skills-pair-programming
结对编程搭档skill,在Claude生成代码后自动进行代码审核和改进建议。当Claude为用户编写、修改或生成代码时,此skill会触发自我审查流程,检查代码质量、安全性、性能和最佳实践,并主动指出改进之处。适用于任何代码生成场景,包括新功能开发、bug修复、代码重构、API实现等。
32