ArchiMate Model Quality
This skill provides guidance on creating high-quality, maintainable ArchiMate models.
Naming Conventions
Element Naming by Type
| Element Category |
Convention |
Examples |
| Structural Elements |
Singular Noun Phrases |
Customer Portal, Data Warehouse |
| Behavioral Elements |
Verb Phrases |
Manage Applications, Process Payments |
| Processes |
Present-tense Verb + Noun |
Handle Claim, Submit Order |
| Services |
Noun or Gerund Phrase |
Customer Information Service, Payment Processing |
| Capabilities |
Compound Noun/Gerund |
Risk Management, Customer Onboarding |
| Value Streams |
Verb-Noun Active |
Acquire Insurance Product |
General Guidelines
- Use Title Case for element names
- Use compound terms for clarity ("Student Information System" not "System")
- Avoid abbreviations unless domain-standard
- Don't include element type in name when tool shows it visually
- Use namespacing prefixes for large models:
[Business Systems][Customer System]
- Prefix views with state:
ASIS_ApplicationLandscape, TOBE_Integration
EA Smells (Quality Issues)
| EA Smell |
Description |
Correction |
| Lonely Component |
Element with no relations |
Connect or remove orphans |
| Strict Layers Violation |
Business directly linked to Technology |
Add Application layer intermediation |
| Dead Element |
Element not in any view |
Review for deletion or include |
| God Component |
One element with too many responsibilities |
Decompose into focused components |
| Chatty Interface |
Too many fine-grained relationships |
Consolidate at appropriate abstraction |
| Missing Relationship |
Implicit dependencies not modeled |
Make relationships explicit |
| Circular Dependencies |
Cyclic relationships |
Restructure to eliminate cycles |
Common Modeling Errors
- Mixing abstraction levels: Detailed processes alongside strategic capabilities
- Using Association as default: When specific relationship type applies
- Over-modeling: Every detail captured, creating maintenance burden
- Wrong element type: Using Process when Function is correct
- Missing services layer: Direct connections bypassing service abstraction
- View-centric thinking: Creating elements for single view, not reusing
- Inconsistent naming: Same concept with different names across views
Abstraction and Granularity
Abstraction Levels by Purpose
| Purpose |
Abstraction Level |
Audience |
| Informing |
High (Overview) |
CxOs, broad stakeholders |
| Deciding |
Medium (Coherence) |
Managers, analysts |
| Designing |
Low (Details) |
Subject matter experts |
Granularity by Element Type
| Element Type |
Right Level |
Over-Modeling Signs |
| Business Processes |
Level 2-3 decomposition |
Every task modeled |
| Applications |
Logical components |
Individual modules as components |
| Technology |
Platform/service level |
Individual servers |
| Capabilities |
2-3 levels deep |
Operational activities |
Key Principles
- 80/20 Rule: Only a subset of ArchiMate elements needed for most modeling
- Match stakeholder needs: Detail viewpoints = one layer/one aspect
- Limit view complexity: Target ~20 elements per view (40 max)
Viewpoint Selection
Stakeholder-to-Viewpoint Mapping
| Stakeholder Type |
Recommended Viewpoints |
| CxOs, Business Managers |
Strategy, Capability Map, Motivation |
| Enterprise Architects |
Layered, Application Cooperation, Implementation |
| Process Architects |
Business Process Cooperation, Service Realization |
| Application Architects |
Application Usage, Implementation and Deployment |
| Infrastructure Architects |
Technology, Technology Usage, Physical |
Pattern-to-Viewpoint Mapping
| Architecture Pattern |
Primary Viewpoints |
| Microservices |
Application Cooperation, Layered, Technology Usage |
| API/Integration |
Application Cooperation, Service Realization |
| Cloud Infrastructure |
Technology, Deployment, Layered |
| Data Architecture |
Information Structure, Application Cooperation |
| Capability Mapping |
Capability Map, Strategy, Resource Map |
Model Quality Checklist
Before Creating
During Modeling
Model Review
Model Organization
Folder Structure (By Layer)
Model
├── Strategy
├── Business
├── Application
├── Technology
├── Physical
├── Motivation
├── Implementation & Migration
├── Relations
└── Views
Folder Structure (By Domain)
Model
├── Customer Domain
│ ├── Business
│ ├── Application
│ └── Technology
├── Finance Domain
└── Shared Services
Additional Resources
Reference Files
For detailed viewpoint guidance and framework integration:
references/viewpoints.md - Complete ArchiMate viewpoints catalog
references/framework-integration.md - TOGAF, BPMN, IT4IT integration patterns