fetch-pr-comments
Fetch PR Comments
Fetch unresolved review comments, top-level review body comments, and PR conversation comments from a GitHub PR and present them in a readable summary. This is a read-only skill -- it does not evaluate, fix, or reply to any comments.
Step 1: Fetch Comments
Auto-detect owner, repo, and PR number from current branch if not provided. Then run scripts/fetch-pr-data.sh, which handles full pagination (review threads, inner comment pages for long threads, reviews, issue comments) and emits a single merged JSON document:
bash <skill-dir>/scripts/fetch-pr-data.sh <owner> <repo> <pr_number>
Output shape:
{
"meta": { "title", "url", "headRefName", "baseRefName" },
"reviewThreads": [ { "id", "isResolved", "isOutdated", "comments": { "nodes": [ { "author", "body", "path", "line", "originalLine", "diffHunk" } ] } } ],
"reviews": [ { "author", "body", "state" } ],
"issueComments": [ { "author", "body", "createdAt", "url" } ]
}
Filter review threads to unresolved only. Filter reviews to those with a non-empty body, excluding PENDING state (unsubmitted drafts). Filter issue comments to those with a non-empty body.
Step 2: Present Results
Display a summary header followed by comments grouped by file.
Summary header:
- PR title and link
- Branch:
head->base - Total threads / unresolved threads
Top-level review comments (if any):
Show reviews with non-empty body before the file-grouped threads:
## Review Comments
### @reviewer (CHANGES_REQUESTED)
> Review body text here
### @another-reviewer (COMMENTED)
> Another review body here
Issue comments (if any):
Show PR conversation comments after review comments, ordered by createdAt:
## Issue Comments
### @commenter (2026-04-20)
> Issue comment body here
### @another-commenter (2026-04-21)
> Another issue comment body here
Inline threads grouped by file:
For each file with unresolved threads, show:
## `path/to/file.ts`
### Line 42 (by @reviewer)
```diff
<diffHunk from first comment>
```
> Comment body here
### Line 10 (by @another-reviewer) [outdated]
```diff
<diffHunk from first comment>
```
> First comment body
>
> **@reply-author:** Reply body
Formatting rules:
- Show top-level review body comments first, grouped under "Review Comments"
- Show PR conversation comments next, grouped under "Issue Comments", ordered by
createdAt - Then group threads by file path, in the order they appear
- Within each file, order threads by line number
- Show the
diffHunkfrom the first comment in each thread as a fenced diff code block before the comment body. This is the code context the reviewer was looking at. - For the line number, use
lineif available. Fall back tooriginalLinefor outdated comments wherelineis null. - Show all comments in a thread (the first is the original review comment; subsequent ones are replies)
- Mark outdated threads with
[outdated] - Use blockquotes for comment bodies
- For threads with multiple comments, show each comment with its author
- If there are zero unresolved threads, zero review body comments, and zero issue comments, say so and stop
Then use the TaskList tool and proceed to any remaining task.
Rules
- If the user wants to fix or reply to comments, direct them to use
/resolve-pr-comments.
More from tobihagemann/turbo
find-dead-code
Find dead code using parallel subagent analysis and optional CLI tools, treating code only referenced from tests as dead. Use when the user asks to \"find dead code\", \"find unused code\", \"find unused exports\", \"find unreferenced functions\", \"clean up dead code\", or \"what code is unused\". Analysis-only — does not modify or delete code.
30simplify-code
Run a multi-agent review of changed files for reuse, quality, efficiency, and clarity issues followed by automated fixes. Use when the user asks to \"simplify code\", \"review changed code\", \"check for code reuse\", \"review code quality\", \"review efficiency\", \"simplify changes\", \"clean up code\", \"refactor changes\", or \"run simplify\".
23smoke-test
Launch the app and hands-on verify that it works by interacting with it. Use when the user asks to \"smoke test\", \"test it manually\", \"verify it works\", \"try it out\", \"run a smoke test\", \"check it in the browser\", or \"does it actually work\". Not for unit/integration tests.
22finalize
Run the post-implementation quality assurance workflow including tests, code polishing, review, and commit. Use when the user asks to \"finalize implementation\", \"finalize changes\", \"wrap up implementation\", \"finish up\", \"ready to commit\", or \"run QA workflow\".
22self-improve
Extract lessons from the current session and route them to the appropriate knowledge layer (project AGENTS.md, auto memory, existing skills, or new skills). Use when the user asks to \"self-improve\", \"distill this session\", \"save learnings\", \"update CLAUDE.md with what we learned\", \"capture session insights\", \"remember this for next time\", \"extract lessons\", \"update skills from session\", or \"what did we learn\".
22evaluate-findings
Critically assess external feedback (code reviews, AI reviewers, PR comments) and decide which suggestions to apply using adversarial verification. Use when the user asks to \"evaluate findings\", \"assess review comments\", \"triage review feedback\", \"evaluate review output\", or \"filter false positives\".
22