Executive Summary Generator

Overview

Generates a senior-manager-ready executive summary from any report input, using a structured communication framework. Always includes gap analysis. Adapts to language, input format, and whether the source is already structured.

Input

Accept any of:

Pasted text
File path → read with Read tool
URL → fetch with WebFetch tool

Output

Format: Markdown
Length: soft limit 500 繁體中文字 or semantic equivalent in English; adjustable on request
Style: professional business without cliché
- Chinese: 台灣現代風格的繁體中文
- English: global English
- Sentence style (default): journalist — short, declarative sentences; one idea per sentence; no subordinate clauses where a full stop works better
- Sentence style (on request): standard prose — longer, flowing sentences permitted
Language: auto-detect from input; explicit user instruction overrides

Framework Selection

Default — no framework specified:

Analyze the report type and content
Recommend the most suitable framework with a one-line rationale
Confirm with user before generating

User pre-states a framework: skip steps 1–3, generate directly.

Frameworks

1. 現況與目標、解決方案、執行模式、預期效益、後續行動

Operational and project reports. Logical progression: where we are → where we want to be → how we get there → what we gain → what happens next.

2. SCQA

Narrative-first. Situation (background) → Complication (problem/tension) → Question (what must be answered) → Answer (recommendation). Best when the problem needs to be felt before the solution lands.

3. SCR+N

Concise variant of SCQA. Situation → Complication → Resolution + explicit Next Steps. Use when time is short and the action path is clear.

4. Pyramid Structure Storyline

Logic-driven. Lead with conclusion, support with arguments, each argument backed by evidence. Apply the quality filter: 具體可行（有問對問題）、有效果、符合經濟效益、可落地.

5. OBRAO (劉恭甫，《不懂這些，別想加薪》)

Decision-meeting focused. Five sections:

Section	Content
O — Objective	What decision needs to be made; who are the decision-makers and stakeholders
B — Benefit	Connect to 四高三低: 提高顧客滿意度/效率/市場佔有率/利潤; 降低成本/風險/研發或上市時間
R — Reason	Problem analysis with quantified evidence
A — Argument	Solution addressing 3 questions: 解決方案是什麼？投入多少資源產生多少效益？如何證明有效？
O — Option	2–3 options max, each with explicit pros and cons

Always-On: Gap Analysis

Every output must end with:

## ⚠️ Gaps & Weaknesses

Flag any of:

Missing data or unquantified claims
Logical gaps in the argument
Unsupported assumptions
Sections where the source report is weak or absent

If the source report is solid, say so explicitly — do not fabricate issues to fill this section.

Auto-Detection: Already-Structured Input

If the input is already organized with clear sections or follows a recognizable framework:

Note this to the user
Provide two versions:
- Reframe — restructure content into the chosen framework (may reorder or reframe arguments)
- Distill — compress the existing structure as-is, preserving the original flow

Workflow

Input received
    → detect language
    → fetch content (if file or URL)
    → detect if already structured
    → framework: user specified? → generate directly
                 not specified?  → recommend + confirm
    → generate summary (soft 500字/words limit)
    → append ⚠️ Gaps & Weaknesses section

Framework Selection Heuristics

Report type	Recommended framework
Decision meeting / 決策會議	OBRAO
Problem investigation	SCQA
Project update / status report	現況與目標…
Policy recommendation	Pyramid
Quick brief / briefing note	SCR+N

executive-summary