Spec-Driven Development
SKILL.md
π Spec-Driven Development
Philosophy: 55 minutes defining the problem, 5 minutes solving it.
1. The Problem
Most AI coding failures happen because the agent starts coding before understanding:
- What the user actually wants (vs. what they said)
- Edge cases and constraints
- Integration points and dependencies
- Success criteria
2. Execution Workflow
PHASE 1: INTERROGATION (No Code Allowed)
ββ "What is the ONE thing this must do?"
ββ "What does success look like? Be specific."
ββ "What are 3 things this must NOT do?"
ββ "Who/what does this interact with?"
ββ "What's the simplest version that would be useful?"
PHASE 2: SPEC DOCUMENT
ββ Write a design.md with:
ββ Goal (1 sentence)
ββ Requirements (numbered list)
ββ Non-Requirements (explicit exclusions)
ββ Architecture (how components connect)
ββ Edge Cases (what could go wrong)
ββ Acceptance Criteria (how to verify)
PHASE 3: USER APPROVAL
ββ Present spec for review
ββ DO NOT proceed to code until approved
PHASE 4: IMPLEMENTATION
ββ Code against the approved spec
ββ Reference spec line items in commits
3. The Spec Template
# Design Spec: [Feature Name]
## Goal
[One sentence describing what this does]
## Requirements
1. [Must do X]
2. [Must handle Y]
3. [Must integrate with Z]
## Non-Requirements (Out of Scope)
- [Will NOT do A]
- [Will NOT support B]
## Architecture
[How the components connect β diagram or description]
## Edge Cases
- [What if input is empty?]
- [What if API is down?]
- [What if user does X instead of Y?]
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] [Testable condition 1]
- [ ] [Testable condition 2]
4. When to Use
- Any feature that touches >3 files
- Any task that takes >30 minutes
- Any time you catch yourself thinking "I'll figure it out as I go"
skill #engineering #planning #spec
Weekly Installs
0
Repository
winstonkoh87/atβ¦a-publicGitHub Stars
430
First Seen
Jan 1, 1970
Security Audits