competitive-analysis
Competitive Analysis
Frameworks for analyzing competitive position and industry dynamics.
When to Use Porter's vs. SWOT
| Framework | Use When |
|---|---|
| Porter's Five Forces | Evaluating industry attractiveness; new market entry; strategic positioning |
| SWOT | Internal capability assessment; go/no-go decisions; strategy planning |
| Competitive Landscape Map | Visualizing whitespace; investor decks; positioning against specific competitors |
| Competitor Profiles | Battlecards for sales; feature gap analysis; threat assessment |
Use Porter's to understand the structural forces shaping the industry. Use SWOT to assess your specific position within it. Combine both for a complete picture.
Porter's Five Forces Template
## Porter's Five Forces: [Industry/Market]
### 1. Competitive Rivalry — Intensity: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
| Factor | Assessment |
|--------|------------|
| Number of competitors | |
| Industry growth rate | |
| Product differentiation | |
| Exit barriers | |
### 2. Threat of New Entrants — Threat Level: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
| Barrier | Strength |
|---------|----------|
| Economies of scale | |
| Brand loyalty | |
| Capital requirements | |
| Network effects | |
| Switching costs | |
### 3. Bargaining Power of Suppliers — Power: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
[Key suppliers, switching cost, concentration]
### 4. Bargaining Power of Buyers — Power: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
[Price sensitivity, alternatives available, buyer concentration]
### 5. Threat of Substitutes — Threat: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
[Alternative ways customers solve the same problem]
### Overall Industry Attractiveness: X/10
[Summary: which forces are most significant and why]
SWOT Analysis
+-------------------------+-------------------------+
| STRENGTHS | WEAKNESSES |
| (Internal +) | (Internal -) |
| * What we do well | * Where we lack |
| * Unique resources | * Resource gaps |
| * Competitive advantages| * Capability limits |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+
| OPPORTUNITIES | THREATS |
| (External +) | (External -) |
| * Market trends | * Competitive pressure |
| * Unmet needs | * Regulatory changes |
| * Technology shifts | * Economic factors |
+-------------------------+-------------------------+
TOWS Matrix (SWOT to Strategy)
| Strengths | Weaknesses | |
|---|---|---|
| Opportunities | SO: Use strengths to capture opportunities | WO: Fix weaknesses to unlock opportunities |
| Threats | ST: Use strengths to mitigate threats | WT: Minimize weaknesses, avoid threats |
Competitor Profile Template
## Competitor: [Name]
### Overview
- Founded: [Year] | Funding: $[Amount] | Employees: [N]
- Target customer: [Segment]
- Pricing: [Model and range]
### Strengths / Weaknesses
+ [Strength 1]
+ [Strength 2]
- [Weakness 1]
- [Weakness 2]
### Threat Assessment: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
- [Why this threat level]
- [Our differentiation vs. this competitor]
Competitive Landscape Map
Plot competitors on two axes that matter most to buyers (e.g., price vs. features, ease of use vs. power):
HIGH PRICE
|
Premium Leaders | Luxury Niche
+-------------+ | +-------------+
| [Comp A] | | | [Comp B] |
+-------------+ | +-------------+
|
LOW ────────────────────+──────────────────── HIGH
FEATURES | FEATURES
|
+-------------+ | +-------------+
| [Comp C] | | | [US] |
+-------------+ | +-------------+
Budget Options | Value Leaders
|
LOW PRICE
Identify whitespace — quadrants with no incumbents that align with unmet buyer needs.
GitHub Signals for Competitive Tracking
# Star count and momentum
gh api repos/owner/repo --jq '{stars: .stargazers_count, forks: .forks_count}'
# Shipping velocity (recent releases)
gh release list --repo owner/repo --limit 5
# Community size
gh api repos/owner/repo/contributors --jq 'length'
| Signal | Check Frequency |
|---|---|
| Star growth | Weekly |
| Release notes | Per release |
| Pricing changes | Monthly |
| Feature launches | Per announcement |
| Full analysis | Quarterly |
References
- Competitive Analysis Rules — Porter's, SWOT, landscape map, competitor profile templates
- Competitive Analysis Guide — Research methodology, data sources, update cadence
Related Skills
ork:market-sizing— Quantify opportunity size alongside competitive landscapeork:business-case— Build financial justification informed by competitive positionork:product-frameworks— Full product strategy toolkit (value prop, prioritization, OKRs)
Version: 1.0.0
More from yonatangross/orchestkit
responsive-patterns
Responsive design with Container Queries, fluid typography, cqi/cqb units, subgrid, intrinsic layouts, foldable devices, and mobile-first patterns for React applications. Use when building responsive layouts or container queries.
464ui-components
UI component library patterns for shadcn/ui and Radix Primitives. Use when building accessible component libraries, customizing shadcn components, using Radix unstyled primitives, or creating design system foundations.
443devops-deployment
Use when setting up CI/CD pipelines, containerizing applications, deploying to Kubernetes, or writing infrastructure as code. DevOps & Deployment covers GitHub Actions, Docker, Helm, and Terraform patterns.
400rag-retrieval
Retrieval-Augmented Generation patterns for grounded LLM responses. Use when building RAG pipelines, embedding documents, implementing hybrid search, contextual retrieval, HyDE, agentic RAG, multimodal RAG, query decomposition, reranking, or pgvector search.
340architecture-decision-record
Use this skill when documenting significant architectural decisions. Provides ADR templates following the Nygard format with sections for context, decision, consequences, and alternatives. Use when writing ADRs, recording decisions, or evaluating options.
326domain-driven-design
DDD tactical patterns for complex business modeling including entities, value objects, aggregates, domain services, repositories, specifications, and bounded contexts. Python dataclass implementations with TypeScript alternatives. Use when building rich domain models, enforcing invariants, or separating domain logic from infrastructure.
326