game-ai-daily-report
Game AI Daily Report
Overview
Use this skill to produce a structured daily or recent-period report about game x AI developments. Lead with formal sources, then use X discussion as the default heat and reaction lens. Favor a shorter, high-confidence report over a noisy roundup.
Workflow
- Resolve the report window.
- Gather candidate items from formal sources first.
- Filter candidates against references/topic-boundary.md.
- Rank and trim them with references/scoring-rules.md.
- Build a strong X-focused heat analysis for the shortlisted items.
- Render the report with references/report-template.md.
- Save the final Markdown reports to two files in the current working directory.
Resolve The Window
Default to the last 3 days for requests like "today" or "daily report."
Use broader windows only when the user asks for them, such as:
- "this week"
- "last 7 days"
- "recent"
If the window is sparse, widen it slightly and say so explicitly in the report.
Gather Formal Sources First
Start with:
- official company blogs and product pages
- conference or event announcements
- developer platform updates
- press releases
- executive interviews in credible publications
- established game and AI trade media
Use references/source-map.md when you need source ideas or want to balance coverage across sub-domains.
Do not start with X chatter unless the user explicitly asks for an X-first view.
Filter For True Game x AI Overlap
Before keeping any item, check whether it meaningfully sits at the overlap of games and AI.
Read references/topic-boundary.md before finalizing the candidate list.
Drop:
- generic AI launches with no game angle
- generic game news with no AI angle
- rumor threads with no credible supporting source
- repeated stories that add no new information
Use X As The Main Heat Lens
Use X to answer questions like:
- Is this item attracting unusual attention?
- Are developers, creators, or players reacting strongly on X?
- Is there visible disagreement between official framing and market reaction?
- Which accounts, communities, or audience segments are driving the conversation?
X heat should not replace formal sourcing, but it should meaningfully affect how the report is ordered and discussed.
Use these rules:
- a formally confirmed item with strong X discussion should move up in report priority
- a formally confirmed item with weak X discussion can stay in the report, but usually lower down
- a highly discussed X topic with weak formal confirmation belongs in
X Heat Check, not in the core fact section
If sensight is available in the environment, use it as an accelerator for X and social heat checks. If not, browse manually.
Other social platforms can still be used, but X should be treated as the default heat source unless the user asks for a different platform.
Write The Report
Always write the report in the section order defined in references/report-template.md:
Today in BriefFormal SignalX Heat CheckGame Companies Using AIAI Companies Building Game ProductsWhat To Watch NextSaved Report
Generate:
- one complete Chinese report
- one complete English report
- one short Chinese chat summary
The Chinese and English reports must use the same facts, ranking, and conclusions. They differ only by language.
Per item, explain:
- what happened
- why it matters
- what the strongest source says
- what the X reaction signal looks like, if useful
Keep attribution visible. Do not dump raw links without explanation.
Save The Report To Disk
Always save the final Markdown reports relative to the current working directory.
Prefer the helper script:
python scripts/save_reports.py `
--date YYYY-MM-DD `
--zh-file <path-to-chinese-markdown> `
--en-file <path-to-english-markdown> `
--output-root .
The script writes into docs/game-ai-daily-reports/ under the provided output root.
Required output targets:
- directory:
docs/game-ai-daily-reports/ - Chinese filename:
YYYY-MM-DD-game-ai-report.zh.md - English filename:
YYYY-MM-DD-game-ai-report.en.md
Behavior:
- create the directory if it does not exist
- overwrite the same day's files if they already exist
- return only a short Chinese summary in chat, not the full bilingual reports
- add final lines in the response for each file path or failure
If saving fails:
- still return the Chinese summary in chat
- report Chinese and English save results separately
Quality Bar
Prefer:
- 3 to 6 strong items over 10 weak ones
- direct source support over second-hand summaries
- concise synthesis over link aggregation
Explicitly note uncertainty when:
- formal confirmation is weak
- X reaction is strong but evidence is thin
- multiple publications are recycling the same story
Example Requests
- "Give me today's game x AI daily report."
- "Summarize the latest week of game companies using AI."
- "What happened in game x AI over the last 7 days?"
- "Track AI companies moving into gaming this week."
Chat Summary Format
When replying in chat, keep it short and in Chinese.
Include:
- the date window
- 3 to 5 core observations
- one overall judgment sentence
- the saved Chinese and English file paths, or separate save failures
More from zhangga/aihub
yahoo-data-fetcher
Fetch real-time stock quotes from Yahoo Finance.
20xai-stock-sentiment
Real-time stock sentiment analysis using Twitter/X data via Grok. Use when analyzing stock ticker sentiment, tracking retail investor mood, or gauging market reaction to events.
17remotion
Remotion renderer for json-render that turns JSON timeline specs into videos. Use when working with @json-render/remotion, building video compositions from JSON, creating video catalogs, or rendering AI-generated video timelines.
15skill-hub-builder
Scaffold and maintain a personal skill hub repository for collecting, syncing, and distributing commonly used agent skills. Use when setting up a reusable skill hub, adding external or local skills, updating bundles, or preparing one-click install flows for a team.
12sensight
触发:查热搜/热榜(抖音/微博/小红书/推特/头条/百度);社交媒体语义搜索(微博/微信/小红书/推特,任意话题);查特定作者/账号近期发文动态;查 AI 行业资讯(论文/博客/模型发布/口碑/深度摘要)。不触发:通用知识问答、代码生成、静态事实类问题。
10long-run-harness
Use for long-running, multi-step work where the agent should keep driving toward the true final outcome across many cycles instead of stopping after one pass. Trigger when the user wants autonomous progress, durable state, session recovery, single-task execution, validation, and review gates in an existing git repository or a similarly structured workspace.
10