communicating-decisions
Communicating Decisions
Tell people what you decided, why, and what it means for them.
How to use
/communicating-decisionsApply decision communication constraints to this conversation./communicating-decisions <decision>Draft communication for the described product decision.
Constraints
Decision Framing
- MUST lead with the decision, then explain the reasoning. Don't bury the headline.
- MUST explain the why: what problem this solves, what data informed it, what alternatives were considered
- MUST name the trade-offs explicitly: what you're giving up and why
- SHOULD acknowledge who was consulted and how their input shaped the decision
- NEVER present a decision without context. Context turns compliance into buy-in.
Audience Calibration
- Engineering needs: what changes, technical implications, timeline impact
- Design needs: scope boundaries, user flows affected, quality bar expectations
- Leadership needs: strategic rationale, business impact, resource implications
- Sales/CS needs: customer-facing changes, messaging guidance, timeline for enablement
- MUST tailor depth and framing to each audience. One announcement doesn't fit all.
Handling Disagreement
- MUST create space for disagreement BEFORE the decision is final
- SHOULD actively seek out the strongest counterargument and address it
- Once decided: expect disagree and commit. The decision is the decision.
- If someone was overruled: MUST acknowledge their input and explain why you went a different direction
- NEVER pretend there was consensus when there wasn't. Be honest about the call.
Documentation
- Every significant decision MUST be written down with: what, why, who was involved, date, alternatives considered
- SHOULD be stored somewhere the team can reference later
- MUST update documentation if the decision gets revisited or changed
- NEVER leave decisions in chat threads where they get lost
Anti-Patterns
- The Mystery Decision: "we're doing X now" with no explanation
- The Consensus Illusion: pretending everyone agreed when someone was clearly overruled
- Decision Amnesia: no record of why a decision was made, leading to revisits months later
- The Drip: communicating a decision slowly through hallway conversations instead of a clear announcement
- Relitigating: allowing decided issues to be reopened without new information
More from dragoon0x/product-skills
prd-writing
Write product requirement documents that engineers want to read and can actually build from. Covers structure, scope discipline, and the balance between clarity and over-specification. Use when writing PRDs, reviewing spec quality, or when engineering keeps asking clarifying questions.
1freemium-vs-paid-gate
Decide whether a product should offer a free tier, free trial, or go straight to paid. Structured decision framework based on economics, distribution model, and competitive landscape. Use when launching a new product or reconsidering your pricing model.
1error-recovery
When things break, guide people forward instead of leaving them stranded. Error message copy, retry patterns, graceful degradation, and recovery flows. Use when building error handling or failed state UIs.
1cta-patterns
Design calls-to-action that people actually click. Covers button copy, placement logic, urgency without manipulation, and progressive commitment. Use when reviewing pages for conversion potential or when CTA copy feels generic.
1onboarding-flow
Design first-run experiences that create the aha moment fast. Reduces time-to-value by sequencing actions, progressive disclosure, and contextual guidance. Use when building signup flows, product tours, or empty states.
1user-psychology
Apply motivation, friction, and trust patterns to product decisions. Maps cognitive biases and behavioral triggers to specific UI and copy choices. Use when reviewing flows for drop-off points or when something feels right but doesn't convert.
1