ICP Research & Audience Intelligence

Communicate Track — Step 1 of 4. Builds deep audience intelligence from real research, not assumptions.

Inputs Required

Product context from .agents/mkt/product-context.md (or willingness to answer product questions)

Output

.agents/mkt/icp-research.md

Quality Gate

Before delivering, verify:

Every VoC quote includes platform name and is from a real source (not agent-generated)
Each persona has a habitat map with ≥3 specific channels (not just "Reddit" — which subreddit?)
Each emotional driver is traced to ≥2 specific quotes
Decision psychology section names specific cognitive biases and objections (not generic "they need trust")

Chain Position

Previous: none (or any skill needing audience context) | Next: mkt-imc

Before Starting

Step 0: Product Context

Check for .agents/mkt/product-context.md. If missing: INTERVIEW. Ask the user to describe their product (what, who, problem, differentiator) and save to .agents/mkt/product-context.md. Or recommend running mkt-copywriting to bootstrap it.

Required Artifacts

Artifact	Source	If Missing
`product-context.md`	mkt-copywriting	INTERVIEW. Ask user to describe product (what, who, problem, differentiator) and save to `.agents/mkt/product-context.md`. Or recommend running `mkt-copywriting`.

Optional Artifacts

Artifact	Source	Benefit
`diagnosis.md`	mkt-diagnosis	Problem context sharpens audience research
`root-cause.md`	mkt-root-cause	Focuses research on confirmed issues

Phase 1: Scope

Ask:

Who are we researching? (Job role, mindset, community, or use case)
What decisions will this inform? (Messaging? Channels? Positioning? All three?)
B2C or B2B? Geography? Specific segments to focus or exclude?

Phase 2: Research

You MUST use WebSearch for real discussions. Do NOT generate hypothetical quotes, invented personas, or assumed pain points.

Search Query Patterns

Use these specific queries. Adapt [topic] to the product/audience:

Goal	Query Pattern
Find communities	`site:reddit.com "[topic]" subreddit`
Find pain points	`site:reddit.com "[topic]" frustrated OR struggling OR hate`
Find reviews	`site:g2.com "[product category]" OR site:capterra.com "[product category]"`
Find discussions	`"[topic]" forum OR community best OR worst`
Find Twitter takes	`site:twitter.com "[topic]" thread`
Find decision criteria	`"[product category]" vs OR alternative OR switch from`
Find objections	`"[product/competitor]" not worth OR overpriced OR disappointing`

Multi-Platform Coverage

Search ≥4 of these categories:

Category	Where	What to Extract
Communities	Reddit, Facebook Groups, LinkedIn Groups	Pain expressions, solution attempts
Social	Twitter/X, TikTok	Real-time frustrations, opinions
Reviews	G2, Capterra, App Store, Amazon	Feature complaints, switching reasons
Content	YouTube comments, Quora	Questions asked, knowledge gaps
Professional	Discord, Slack communities, industry forums	Unfiltered opinions, workflow details

VoC Quality Criteria

A good quote has:

Emotional intensity (frustration, excitement, relief — not neutral)
Specificity (mentions a specific tool, workflow, number, or scenario)
Recency (within last 12 months)
Relevance to the product category

A bad quote is:

Generic ("I wish there was a better way")
Old (2+ years, industry may have shifted)
From a seller/marketer, not a real user
A one-word reaction with no context

Collect 3 quotes per pain category. Stop when patterns repeat.

Pain Analysis (3 Levels)

Level	What	Where to Find
Surface	What they openly complain about	Public forums, review sites
Hidden	What they say anonymously	Reddit throwaways, anonymous reviews
Emotional	Identity threats, status anxiety, fear	Language intensity, desperation indicators

MANDATORY: Habitat Mapping

For every platform where you find audience activity, document specifically:

Platform	Specific Community	Density	Engagement Type	Role
Reddit	r/[specific subreddit]	H/M/L	Lurker/Engager/Creator	Discovery/Trust/Conversion

Not "Reddit" — which subreddit. Not "LinkedIn" — which group or content type.

See references/habitat-mapping.md for density definitions.

Decision Psychology

Document:

Trigger: What event makes them seek solutions?
Research behavior: Where they go first, second, third
Cognitive biases: Which are strongest? (Loss aversion? Social proof? Authority?)
Top 3 objections: What stops them from buying? What's the psychological root of each?
Trust signals: Who/what do they trust? What creates instant distrust?

Phase 3: Synthesize

2 Personas (max)

For each persona, provide ALL of:

Demographics: Age range, role, industry, company size
Pain Profile: Top 3 pains with triggers, impact, and quotes
Decision Psychology: Research behavior, biases, objections + roots
Habitat Map: ≥3 specific channels with density and engagement type
VoC Quotes: 3-5 most revealing, with platform attribution

Top 3 Emotional Drivers

Core psychological motivations. Each traced to ≥2 specific quotes.

Red Flags

Language or positioning that triggers instant skepticism for this audience.

Artifact Template

---
skill: mkt-icp-research
version: 1
date: [today's date]
status: draft
---

# ICP Research

**Date:** [today]
**Skill:** mkt-icp-research
**Product:** [from product-context.md]

## Persona 1: [Name/Archetype]

**Demographics:** [Age, role, industry, company size]

### Pain Profile
1. **[Pain name]** — [description]
   - Trigger: [what causes acute pain]
   - Impact: [daily/financial/professional]
   - Quote: "[exact quote]" — [Platform, context]
   - Quote: "[exact quote]" — [Platform, context]

2. **[Pain name]** — [description]
   [Same format]

3. **[Pain name]** — [description]
   [Same format]

### Decision Psychology
- **Trigger:** [what event starts their search]
- **Research path:** [where they go 1st → 2nd → 3rd]
- **Key biases:** [which cognitive biases are strongest]
- **Objections:** (1) [objection] — root: [psychological reason]. (2) [objection] — root: [reason]. (3) [objection] — root: [reason].
- **Trust signals:** [what they trust]
- **Distrust triggers:** [what kills credibility]

### Habitat Map
| Platform | Community | Density | Engagement | Role |
|----------|-----------|---------|-----------|------|
| [Specific] | [Specific] | H/M/L | [Type] | [Role] |

## Persona 2: [Name/Archetype]
[Same format]

## Top 3 Emotional Drivers
1. **[Driver]** — [explanation]. Quotes: "[quote 1]" ([source]), "[quote 2]" ([source])
2. **[Driver]** — [explanation]. Quotes: ...
3. **[Driver]** — [explanation]. Quotes: ...

## Red Flags
- [Language/positioning that triggers skepticism and why]

## Next Step
Run `mkt-imc` to turn these insights into a communication plan.

> On re-run: rename existing artifact to `icp-research.v[N].md` and create new with incremented version.

References

references/habitat-mapping.md — Density definitions, cross-persona analysis
references/icp-to-imc-handoff.md — How to package outputs for IMC
references/voice-of-customer.md — VoC collection patterns